DOC714 Symposium I Week 1 Assignment   Degree Program Statement   Part 1: All Students   Write a brief statement indicating your degree program and the research topic you are considering.   Submit your Part 1 assignment.   Part 2: EDD and DM Students   If you are in the EDD or DM programs, include in […]

DOC714 Symposium I Week 1 Assignment   Event Synthesis Refer to the article you read in Wk 1 Discussion 2 – Critically Reflective Practice, “Critically Reflective Practice,” located in the University Library.   Locate a minimum of 1 additional peer-reviewed article on perspective switching, differing perspectives, or another relevant topic.   Identify 1 of the following […]

DOC714 Symposium I Week 8 Discussion   DQ1 Significance of the Study   Review the significance of the study section in the College of Doctoral Studies Dissertation Guide and Alignment Handbook on CDS Central, Prospectus Guide, and Prospectus Template.   The significance of the study section explains why the study is a unique approach to […]

DOC714 Symposium I Week 1 Discussion DQ1 Biases and Situatedness   The initial stage of cognitive development, defined as dualism by Perry (1968/1999), is defined by Thoma (1993) as: “characterized by a view that objective and immutable answers exist for most questions and that authorities or experts know or can discover the eternal truths. The […]

DOC714 Symposium I Week 7 Discussion DQ1 Research Methodology (Proposed Method and Design) Peer Review   Note: Rather than a standard discussion post, this discussion is a peer-review format.   Based on the work that you completed in RES/709: Research Conceptualization and Design, review and revise your research method and design. Remember this is a […]

DOC714 Symposium I Week 6 Discussion DQ1 Problem Statement Peer Review   Note: Rather than a standard discussion post, this discussion is a peer-review format.   Complete the Problem Statement Worksheet to prepare for making revisions.   Based on the work that you completed in RES/709: Research Conceptualization and Design, and on your completed Problem […]

DOC714 Symposium I Week 5 Discussion DQ1 Introspection and Outrospection   Watch “RSA ANIMATE: The Power of Outrospection” on the RSA YouTube™ video community channel. A transcript is available.   Write a 250- to 300-word response to the following:   Consider the differences between affective empathy and cognitive empathy. How will understanding the differences affect […]

DOC714 Symposium I Week 4 Discussion DQ1 Reading an Abstract   An article’s abstract “contains enough essential information about the article to be able to assess its merit and relevance…and you can discern and anticipate the logic of the author’s argument before even reading through the full article” (Shon, 2015, p. 34).   Locate 1 […]

DOC714 Symposium I Week 2 Discussion DQ1 Three-Stage Model of Scholarship, Practice, and Leadership (SPL) SPL Overvew   Throughout your program you will be introduced to the many challenges leaders face in managing complex individual and group dynamics. Leaders today must shape organizational culture, communicate value systems, model ethical behavior, engage and inspire followers, and […]

DOC714 Symposium I Week 1 Discussion DQ1 Biases and Situatedness The initial stage of cognitive development, defined as dualism by Perry (1968/1999), is defined by Thoma (1993) as: “characterized by a view that objective and immutable answers exist for most questions and that authorities or experts know or can discover the eternal truths. The dualism, […]