2 Parts: Assignment and Powerpoint: A COPY OF THE ASSIGNMENT IS ATTACHED PART I Using the Grand Challenges for Social Work Statement “Policy Recommendations for Meeting the Grand Challenge to Smart Decarceration”, choose one of the four policy recommendations suggested to answer the following sections listed below. Please use additional research and resources to support […]

Minimum 17 pgs A copy of the assignment is attached. I’ve also attached a lot of resources that can be used, but you will need to find more. For this assignment, students will be analyzing a major problem facing today’s juvenile justice system.  Chosen Problem: Mental Health and Juvenile Justice A central purpose of the […]

350 words Book: Applied Human Behavior in the Social Environment Chapter 11, "Major Life Phases Influencing Human Behavior: Childhood."  This chapter explains how the development in childhood is influenced mostly by the initial attachment of the child to the parent or caregiver, and then in an ongoing way through the parenting interactions with the child. While […]

350 words Book: Social Policy and Social Programs Read Chapter 1, "Analyzing the Social Problem Background of Social Policies and Programs," pages 7–26. Multimedia: Bloom’s Taxonomy Choose a social problem affecting an oppressed population you are interested in learning about. Research the history of how that issue became a social problem and report your findings. […]

 students are to review case summaries of Gideon v. Wainwright 372 U.S. 335 (1963),  and Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436. Next, read the case of George Stinney  Jr.  and compare how Wainwright and Miranda cases stemmed from George Stinney. Also, explain some unethical procedures in George Stinney case and how his life impacted today’s […]

format: Intro, body, conclusion. No reference or citation should be in own words  We discussed the Fashion Industry (Fast Fashion) and its impact on the environment and child labour. The $5 T-shirt is readily available today, and its existence has profound implications for the type of society in which we live. Describe and analyze these […]

350 words Explain why there is no such thing as a right or wrong social policy viewpoint. Provide examples from the issue you researched in the first discussion of this unit to illustrate your claims and support them with course references. Include how different groups define the same problem; accomplish this by showing how the […]

  Select a peer-reviewed article (relevant to your practice setting or research interest) that uses a quantitative research design. You may select a previous article or a new article. Critique the discussion section of the respective article. Using the Primer for Critiquing Sections of a Research Article document, rate the discussion section of the article […]

 Explain why caregivers are considered patient advocates. When and how does one become a patient advocate? Discuss the legal implications of being a patient advocate. What resources can patient advocates access to help them perform their roles/responsibilities?   NationalCenterforEthicsinHealthCare.pdf Ch.19-LegalAspects.docx Ch.15-LegalAspects.docx CHAPTER.13-LegalAspects.docx LegalAspectsCh.3.docx 19 Patient Rights and Responsibilities © Ocskay Bence/Shutterstock It’s Your Gavel… A MOTHER’S RIGHT: A CHILD’S DEATH Harrell, a Jehovah’s Witness, was 6 months pregnant when physicians discovered a life-threatening blood condition that could deteriorate and place both her life and the life of the fetus in jeopardy. Because of religious beliefs, Harrell objected to a blood transfusion. After an emergency hearing, the court ruled that a blood transfusion could be given to Harrell if it was necessary to save the life of the fetus and that after the child was born, a blood transfusion could be given to the child if necessary to save the child’s life. The Harrells appealed. The child was delivered by cesarean section and died 2 days later. No blood transfusion was given to Harrell or to the child. As a result, the hospital and the state claimed that the appeal of the trial court’s order is moot. Because of the hospital’s misunderstanding about its standing to bring such proceedings, the Florida District Court of Appeals addressed the issue as capable of repetition yet evading review. The Florida Constitution guarantees that a competent person has the constitutional right to choose or refuse medical treatment. In cases where these rights are litigated, a party generally seeks to invoke the power of the state, through the exercise of the court’s judicial power, either to enforce the patient’s rights or to prevent the patient from exercising those rights. The state has a duty to ensure that a person’s wishes regarding medical treatment are respected. Harrell argued that the hospital should not have intervened in her private decision to refuse a blood transfusion. She claimed that the state never had been a party in this action and had not asserted any interest and that the hospital had no authority to assume the state’s responsibilities.1 WHAT IS YOUR VERDICT? Learning Objectives The reader, upon completion of this chapter, will be able to: •  Discuss the importance of understanding patient rights. […]

 Discuss the correct way of charting in a patient’s record. Analyze the impact of poor documentation in patient care? Give one or two examples. Explain possible legal concerns for poor documentation  NationalCenterforEthicsinHealthCare.pdf Ch.19-LegalAspects.docx Ch.15-LegalAspects.docx CHAPTER.13-LegalAspects.docx LegalAspectsCh.3.docx 19 Patient Rights and Responsibilities © Ocskay Bence/Shutterstock It’s Your Gavel… A MOTHER’S RIGHT: A CHILD’S DEATH Harrell, a Jehovah’s Witness, was 6 months pregnant when physicians discovered a life-threatening blood condition that could deteriorate and place both her life and the life of the fetus in jeopardy. Because of religious beliefs, Harrell objected to a blood transfusion. After an emergency hearing, the court ruled that a blood transfusion could be given to Harrell if it was necessary to save the life of the fetus and that after the child was born, a blood transfusion could be given to the child if necessary to save the child’s life. The Harrells appealed. The child was delivered by cesarean section and died 2 days later. No blood transfusion was given to Harrell or to the child. As a result, the hospital and the state claimed that the appeal of the trial court’s order is moot. Because of the hospital’s misunderstanding about its standing to bring such proceedings, the Florida District Court of Appeals addressed the issue as capable of repetition yet evading review. The Florida Constitution guarantees that a competent person has the constitutional right to choose or refuse medical treatment. In cases where these rights are litigated, a party generally seeks to invoke the power of the state, through the exercise of the court’s judicial power, either to enforce the patient’s rights or to prevent the patient from exercising those rights. The state has a duty to ensure that a person’s wishes regarding medical treatment are respected. Harrell argued that the hospital should not have intervened in her private decision to refuse a blood transfusion. She claimed that the state never had been a party in this action and had not asserted any interest and that the hospital had no authority to assume the state’s responsibilities.1 WHAT IS YOUR VERDICT? Learning Objectives The reader, upon completion of this chapter, will be able to: •  Discuss the importance of understanding patient rights. •  Discuss the importance of understanding patient responsibilities. •  Understand how rights and responsibilities go hand in hand. This chapter provides a brief overview of both the rights and responsibilities of patients. Every person possesses certain rights guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States and its amendments, including the freedoms of speech, religion, and association, and the right not to be discriminated against on the grounds of race, creed, color, or national origin. The Supreme Court has interpreted the Constitution as also guaranteeing certain other rights, such as the right to privacy and self-determination, and the right to accept or reject medical treatment. With rights come responsibilities. The patient, for example, has a right to receive emergency care, while at the same time also has a responsibility to let the caregiver know the limits of that care as noted in the opening case above where the patient objects to the administration of blood. 19.1 PATIENT RIGHTS Patient rights may be classified as either legal—those emanating from law—or human statements of desirable ethical principles such as the right to be treated with dignity and respect. The rights of patients discussed here do not exist in a vacuum without limitations—they are tethered to moral obligations and responsibilities that have their roots in the law, ethics, moral principles, and religious values. To kill another human being, for example, is wrong and punishment will follow if the life of another is taken. Patients have a right to receive a clear explanation of tests, diagnoses, prescribed medications, prognosis, and treatment options.2 Most federal, state, and local programs (e.g., Medicare, Medicaid) specifically require, as a condition for receiving funds under such programs, an affirmative statement on the part of the organization that it will not discriminate. […]