HS420-6: Evaluate health informatics for continuous quality improvement.
As the director for a 200 bed facility, you are tasked with ensuring compliance with health information exchange standards, interoperability, and maintaining continuous quality improvement methods within the facility related to the use of health informatics and the exchange of health information.
Your task is to generate a report for the Board of Directors that details the facilities compliance with interoperability standards related to the EHR, patient portal, and health information exchange within the region. Within the report address how health informatics can be utilized to improve patient quality using continuous quality improvement methodologies. Address costs associated with implementation of any new systems and evaluate the lifecycle of hardware as related to selection, evaluation, and disposal.
Within your report be sure to include at least three examples of standards related to health information exchange, three standards related to Interoperability, three examples of how health informatics can be utilized to improve quality, and three examples of quality improvement methodologies. Also, address the need for API’s and HL7® FHIR® defining what it is and how it is utilized and the impact of the 21st Century Cures Act
Your report should be in APA format, 3 pages in length, not including the title and reference page.
Criterion 1: Report to the Board of Directors
●.The submission contained a detailed, professional, and well-organized report for the Board of Directors that provided information on the facilities compliance with interoperability standards related to the EHR, patient portal, and Health Information Exchange within the region.
●The submission contained a basic report for the Board of Directors that provided information on the facilities compliance with interoperability standards related to the EHR, patient portal, and Health Information Exchange but needed additional professional organization of the criteria.
●The submission contained a rudimentary report for the Board of Directors that needed additional organization of the criteria presented.
●No submission of a report for the Board of Directors was present
Score of Criterion 1: Report to the Board of Directors,
/ 20
Criterion 2 Level III Max Points
20 points
Level II Max Points
16 points
Level I Max Points
12 points
Not Present
0 points
Criterion Score
Criterion 2: Interoperability Compliance of the Facility
●Interoperability Compliance of the facility as related to the EHR, patient portal, and Health Information Exchange within the region were present with advanced and detailed information
●Interoperability Compliance of the facility as related to the EHR, patient portal, and Health Information Exchange within the region were present with basic information
●Interoperability Compliance of the facility was discussed but needed to relate to the EHR, patient portal, and Health Information Exchange within the region
●No information related to Interoperability Compliance of the facility as related to the EHR, patient portal, and Health Information Exchange within the region were present
Score of Criterion 2: Interoperability Compliance of the Facility,
/ 20
Criterion 3 Level III Max Points
20 points
Level II Max Points
16 points
Level I Max Points
12 points
Not Present
0 points
Criterion Score
Criterion 3: Health Informatics and Patient Quality Improvement
●The report addressed how health informatics can be utilized to improve patient quality using continuous quality improvement methodologies with detailed examples
●The report provided basic information related to how health informatics can be utilized to improve patient quality but needed specific examples related to continuous quality improvement methodologies
●The report provided a rudimentary overview related to health informatics and patient quality but did not detail continuous quality improvement methodologies
●No report was present related to how health informatics can be utilized to improve patient quality using continuous quality improvement methodologies
Score of Criterion 3: Health Informatics and Patient Quality Improvement,
/ 20
Criterion 4 Level III Max Points
10 points
Level II Max Points
8 points
Level I Max Points
6 points
Not Present
0 points
Criterion Score
Criterion 4: Hardware Cost and Evaluation
●Costs associated with implementation of new systems and evaluated the lifecycle of hardware as related to selection, evaluation, and disposal with detailed and specific examples
● A basic overview of Costs associated with implementation of new systems with a limited evaluation of the lifecycle of hardware as related to selection, evaluation, and disposal with limited examples and detail
●Health implementation costs were discussed but further detail was needed related lifecycle of hardware as related to selection, evaluation, and disposal
● No information related to Costs associated with implementation of new systems was present or information regarding the lifecycle of hardware was present
Score of Criterion 4: Hardware Cost and Evaluation,
/ 10
Criterion 5 Level III Max Points
20 points
Level II Max Points
16 points
Level I Max Points
12 points
Not Present
0 points
Criterion Score
Criterion 5: Standard Examples and Information related to 21 Century Cures Act
●Three examples of HIE standards, three examples of Interoperability, three examples of health informatics, and three examples of quality improvement methodologies were present. API and FHIR needs were addressed as related to the 21st Century Cures Act.
●Two examples of HIE standards, two examples of Interoperability, two examples of health informatics, and two examples of quality improvement methodologies were present. API and FHIR needs were addressed as related to the 21st Century Cures Act.
●One example of HIE standards, one example of Interoperability, one example of health informatics, and one example of quality improvement methodologies were present. API and FHIR needs were not addressed.
●Examples of standards related to HIE, Interoperability, health informatics, and quality improvement were not present and no details related to API and FHIR were present.
Score of Criterion 5: Standard Examples and Information related to 21 Century Cures Act,
/ 20
Criterion 6 Level III Max Points
10 points
Level II Max Points
8 points
Level I Max Points
6 points
Not Present
0 points
Criterion Score
Criterion 6: Writing and Mechanics
● Few or no errors in writing, mechanics, APA style, and citation
● Minor errors in writing, mechanics, APA style, and citation
● Some major errors in writing, mechanics, APA style, and citation
● Major errors are present throughout in writing, mechanics, APA style, and citation
Score of Criterion 6: Writing and Mechanics,
/ 10
TotalScore of HS420 Unit 9 Assignment Rubric,
/ 100
Requirements:
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
