Submit your 20-25 page final capstone project that synthesizes the work you completed in the previous four assessments. ? Introduction Note: Each assessment in this course builds on the wo
Submit your 20-25 page final capstone project that synthesizes the work you completed in the previous four assessments.
Introduction
Note: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.
Congratulations! The finish line is in sight for both the capstone project you have been working on all quarter and your Master's of Science in Nursing program. Take a moment to appreciate all you have accomplished and give yourself a pat on the back; you have earned it!
Your final submission for your capstone project will bring together all of the sections you have worked on throughout this course, as well as the relevant revisions you have made to those sections based on feedback from your instructor, as well as feedback you have received or observations you may have made during your practicum experience. True professionals can learn to strive for continuous improvement in their work and incorporate feedback from colleagues and leaders to help scaffold improvement efforts. As a master's-level nurse you will be expected to create and implement plans and evaluate their outcomes. Being able to envision a pathway for a project to move from the idea phase all the way through the evaluation phase is a critical skill. By successfully synthesizing the various sections of this project together into one final artifact, you will have demonstrated your competence in this essential skill.
Preparations
- Read Guiding Questions: Final Project Submission [DOC]. This document is designed to give you questions to consider and additional guidance to help you successfully complete this assessment.
- As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.
- What is the most useful skill or concept you learned while pursuing your MSN degree?
- How will you leverage your degree to help you reach your ideal practice career path?
- How will you be able to apply the work you have done on your capstone project to improve your personal practice?
Instructions
Note: The assessments in this course are sequenced in such a way as to help you build specific skills that you will use throughout your program. Complete the assessments in the order in which they are presented.
For your final capstone project submission you will synthesize the work you completed in the previous four assessments. Please make sure that you have made relevant revisions as suggested by your instructor, as well as relevant additions that you uncovered during your practicum experience. The only brand-new content that you will need to create for this assessment is an Abstract and an Introduction.
This final submission will be graded using the seven program outcomes (POs) for the Master's of Science in Nursing program. As a reminder they are:
- Lead organizational change to improve the experience of care, population health, and professional work life while decreasing cost of care.
- Evaluate the best available evidence for use in clinical and organizational decision making.
- Apply quality improvement methods to impact patient, population, and systems outcomes.
- Design patient- and population-centered care to improve health outcomes.
- Integrate interprofessional care to improve safety and quality and to decrease cost of care.
- Evaluate the ability of existing and emerging information, communication, and health care technologies to improve safety and quality and to decrease cost of care.
- Defend health policy that improves the experience of care, population health, and professional work life while decreasing cost of care.
In addition, you will be assessed on how well you incorporated the feedback you received from your instructor on your previous work in this course via the following criterion:
- Integrate writing feedback to improve the clarity and quality of final product.
You will also be assessed on the completion of hours toward your practicum experience.
- Demonstrate completion of hours toward the practicum experience.
See the scoring guide for specific grading criteria related to these requirements.
Please carefully review the outline below to see which parts of the final submission will align to which program outcomes. (Note: The bullet points in the outline correspond to the grading criteria from your previous assessments. It may be worth putting in some extra revisions on the material related to criteria on which you did not previously score as well as you would have liked. You may also wish to read the Guiding Questions: Final Project Submission document to better understand how each aspect of your submission will be assessed.) It is important to remember that if you do a quality job addressing the points below, you will meet all of the program outcomes. The alignment is provided for transparency, but do not become preoccupied with how each point will feed into the scoring guide.
Abstract
- Summarize the purpose, approach, and any relevant findings of the final capstone project submission (PO #1).
Introduction
- Summarize your need, target population, and setting (PO #1).
- Provide a high-level overview of your intervention plan (PO #4).
- Justify the importance of your need and intervention plan (PO #1).
- Provide a high-level overview of your implementation plan (PO #4).
- Provide a high-level over view of your evaluation plan (PO #4).
Reminder: these instructions are an outline. Your heading for this this section should be Problem Statement and not Part 1: Problem Statement.
Part 1: Problem Statement
Need Statement
- Analyze a health promotion, quality improvement, prevention, education or management need (PO #1).
Population and Setting
- Describe a target population and setting in which an identified need will be addressed (PO #4).
Intervention Overview
- Explain an overview of one or more interventions that would help address an identified need within a target population and setting (PO #3).
Comparison of Approaches
- Analyze potential interprofessional alternatives to an initial intervention with regard to their possibilities to meet the needs of the project, population, and setting. (PO #5).
Initial Outcome Draft
- Define an outcome that identifies the purpose and intended accomplishments of an intervention for a health promotion, quality improvement, prevention, education or management need (PO #4).
Time Estimate
- Propose a rough time frame for the development and implementation of an intervention to address and identified need (PO #1).
Part 2: Literature Review
- Analyze current evidence to validate an identified need and its appropriateness within the target population and setting (PO #2).
- Evaluate and synthesize resources from diverse sources illustrating existing health policy that could impact the approach taken to address an identified need (PO #7).
PART 3: INTERVENTION PLAN
Intervention Plan Components
- Define the major components of an intervention plan for a health promotion, quality improvement, prevention, education, or management need (PO #4).
- Explain the impact of cultural needs and characteristics of a target population and setting on the development of intervention plan components (PO #4).
Theoretical Foundations
- Evaluate theoretical nursing models, strategies from other disciplines, and health care technologies relevant to an intervention plan (PO #6).
- Justify the major components of an intervention by referencing relevant and contemporary evidence from the literature and best practices (PO #2).
Stakeholders, Policy, and Regulations
- Analyze the impact of stakeholder needs, health care policy, regulations, and governing bodies relevant to health care practice and specific components of an intervention plan (PO #7).
Ethical and Legal Implications
- Analyze relevant ethical and legal issues related to health care practice, organizational change, and specific components of an intervention plan (PO #1).
Part 4: Implementation Plan
Management and Leadership
- Propose strategies for leading, managing, and implementing professional nursing practices to ensure interprofessional collaboration during the implementation of an intervention plan (PO #5).
- Analyze the implications of change associated with proposed strategies for improving the quality and experience of care while controlling costs (PO #1).
Delivery and Technology
- Propose appropriate delivery methods to implement an intervention which will improve the quality of the project (PO #3).
- Evaluate the current and emerging technological options related to the proposed delivery methods (PO #6).
Stakeholders, Policy, and Regulations
- Analyze stakeholders, regulatory implications, and potential support that could impact the implementation of an intervention plan (PO #5).
- Propose existing or new policy considerations that would support the implementation of an intervention plan (PO #7).
Timeline
- Propose a timeline to implement an intervention plan with reference to specific factors that influence the timing of implementation (PO #1).
Part 5: Evaluation of Plan
- Define the outcomes that are the goal of an intervention plan (PO #4).
- Create an evaluation plan to determine the impact of an intervention for a health promotion, quality improvement, prevention, education, or management need (PO #3).
Part 6: Discussion
Advocacy
- Analyze the nurse's role in leading change and driving improvements in the quality and experience of care (PO #1).
- Explain how the intervention plan affects nursing and interprofessional collaboration, and how the health care field gains from the plan (PO #5).
Future Steps
- Explain how the current project could be improved upon to create a bigger impact in the target population as well as to take advantage of emerging technology and care models to improve outcomes and safety (PO #6).
Reflection on Leading Change and Improvement
- Reflect on how the project has impacted your ability to lead change in personal practice and future leadership positions (PO #1).
- Reflect on the ways in which the completed intervention, implementation, and evaluation plans can be transferred into your personal practice to drive quality improvement in other contexts (PO #3).
Address Generally Throughout
- Integrate resources from diverse sources that illustrate support for all aspects of the project as appropriate throughout the final submission (PO #2).
- Clearly, concisely, and cohesively articulate a health care need, population, setting, stakeholders, supporting evidence, intervention, and evaluation (PO #6).
- Integrate writing feedback to improve the clarity and quality of final product.
Additional Requirements
- Length of submission: 20–25 pages (including references).
- Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
- Number of resources: 12–18 resources.
- APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style.
- Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
- Competency 1: Lead organizational change to improve the experience of care, population health, and professional work life while decreasing cost of care.
- Competency 2: Evaluate the best available evidence for use in clinical and organizational decision making.
- Competency 3: Apply quality improvement methods to impact patient, population, and systems outcomes.
- Competency 4: Design patient- and population-centered care to improve health outcomes.
- Competency 5: Integrate interprofessional care to improve safety and quality and to decrease cost of care.
- Competency 6: Evaluate the ability of existing and emerging information, communication, and health care technologies to improve safety and quality and to decrease cost of care.
- Competency 7: Defend health policy that improves the experience of care, population health, and professional work life while decreasing cost of care.
Note: You will also be assessed on two additional criteria unaligned to a course competency:
- Integrate writing feedback to improve the clarity and quality of the final product.
- Demonstrate completion of hours toward the practicum experience.
Grading Scale:
1- Lead organizational change to improve the experience of care, population health, and professional work life while decreasing cost of care.
Passing Grade: Leads organizational change to improve the experience of care, population health, and professional work life while decreasing cost of care; identifies knowledge gaps, unknowns, or missing information.
2- Evaluate the best available evidence for use in clinical and organizational decision making.
Passing Grade: Evaluates the best available evidence for use in clinical and organizational decision making, and impartially evaluates the strength of the evidence.
3- Apply quality improvement methods to impact patient, population, and systems outcomes.
Passing Grade: Applies quality improvement methods to impact patient, population, and systems outcomes; identifies areas of uncertainty, knowledge gaps, or additional information that would be needed in order to gain a more complete understanding.
4- Design patient- and population-centered care to improve health outcomes.
Passing Grade: Designs patient- and population-centered care to improve health outcomes, identifying assumptions underlying the intervention, implementation, and evaluation plans.
5- Integrate interprofessional care to improve safety and quality and to decrease cost of care.
Passing Grade: Integrates interprofessional care to improve safety and quality, and to decrease cost of care, impartially considering conflicting evidence or other perspectives.
6- Evaluate the ability of existing and emerging information, communication, and health care technologies to improve safety and quality and to decrease cost.
Passing Grade: Evaluates the ability of existing and emerging information, communication, and health care technologies to improve safety and quality and to decrease cost of care, identifying the criteria used for evaluation.
7- Defend health policy that improves the experience of care, population health, and professional work life while decreasing cost of care.
Passing Grade: Defends and proposes relevant changes to health policy to further improve the experience of care, population health, and professional work life while decreasing cost of care.
8- Integrate writing feedback to improve the clarity and quality of final product.
Passing Grade: Integrates writing feedback to improve the clarity and quality of final product, and leverages the revision process to address areas of missing information.
[removed],
1
Intervention Plan Design: Lowering Readmission rates for Head and Neck Cancer Patients at University of Miami Hospital
Name
Capella University
Professor
August, 2022
Intervention Plan Design
Lowering Readmission rates for Head and Neck Cancer Patients at University of Miami Hospital
Research shows that approximately 20% of all head and neck oncology patients are readmitted within 30 days postoperatively. Some significant risk factors for 30-day readmission include transition to home or nursing facility care, wound infections, type of surgical procedure, lower socioeconomic status, tobacco smoking, and congestive heart failure (Goel et al., 2019). High head and neck oncology readmission rates are associated with increased healthcare costs, recurrent disease, emotional turmoil, and mortality. Additionally, the 30-day readmission rate is a significant surrogate measure of healthcare quality as it affects patient satisfaction. Based on these findings, it is crucial for healthcare providers to develop perioperative interventions to reduce the readmission rate for head and neck cancer patients. In an effort to reduce the readmission rate, this paper presents a holistic intervention plan that outlines the core components of an intervention plan. The paper further discusses the ethical and legal implications and the theoretical foundations relevant to the intervention. Finally, the paper highlights the stakeholders, regulations, and policies pertinent to the proposed intervention.
Intervention Plan Components
Defining the Major Components
This intervention plan will be implemented at the Head and Neck oncology unit at the University of Miami Hospital. This multidisciplinary intervention plan is bundle care consisting of two major components: comprehensive patient education and post-discharge phone-based care and follow-up.
One major cause of head and neck oncology readmissions is wound infections or complications (Chiesa-Estomba et al., 2022). Patient education plays a vital role in wound care and proper management of the surgical site. This is because head and neck oncology patients have unique post-operative needs that require specialized skills (Jabbour et al., 2017). The patient education component addresses post-operative care topics such as wound, tracheostomy, and gastrostomy care. Patient education also ensures that the patient and caregivers understand the diagnosis and treatment plan. For optimal outcomes, patient education will be delivered to the patient, family members, and any caregiver involved in the patient's care. A personalized patient education plan ensures that the patient and caregiver have the skills, knowledge, and attitudes to promote post-operative healing. This reduces readmissions as it fosters positive patient outcomes, decreases anxiety, and increases patient satisfaction.
The patient post-discharge care plan consists of telephone follow-up calls within 72 hours after discharge from the oncology surgical unit. During this telephone encounter, the nursing staff uses a post-discharge survey to inquire about the patient's health and address any emerging patient concerns. Questions asked in the telephone survey will address areas such as pain management, fever, alarm symptoms such as nausea or vomiting, and any patient concerns. The provider will also use the call to schedule and confirm any post-operative appointments. To augment the telephone call, patients will have an opportunity to share wound and surgical site photos or request for videoconference consultation with the provider. The post-discharge telephone follow-up calls are expected to reduce the 30-day readmission rate for head and neck cancer patients. This is because they allow the provider to review the patient's recovery progress and identify complications before they worsen.
Impact of Cultural Needs
It is crucial to understand the impact cultural needs and characteristics of a target may have on an intervention. Head and neck cancer patients have a multitude of cultural needs and values that should be considered in the intervention. For instance, head and neck patients may experience emotional turmoil like other oncological patients. To accommodate their emotional needs, the intervention's telephone follow-up survey will ask about the patient's psychological and emotional status. Appropriate mental health referrals will be made for patients who require psychological support.
Awareness of cultural aspects of caregiving that may impact the patient's post-operative care is crucial. For instance, the post-discharge plan should be home-based if a family has a collectivist culture and negative attitude towards nursing home care. The provider should also determine whether an individual or the whole family will carry out the patient's post-operative care. Who is responsible for the medical and other caregiving tasks? Who provides the patient's meals? Who handles the patient's financial needs? Who is responsible for scheduling follow-up appointments? To ensure optimal patient outcomes and reduced readmission, this intervention plan ensures the participation of all caregivers in the education intervention.
Theoretical Foundations
Evaluation of Theoretical Nursing Theories and Technologies
One of the theoretical nursing models that underpin this intervention plan is Orem's Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory. This theory postulates that a patient's ability to self-care significantly enhances their health outcomes and well-being (Yip, 2021). Based on this theory, this intervention plan provides comprehensive patient education as a strategy to address self-care deficits and reduce readmission. Another relevant theory is Leininger's Transcultural Nursing Theory. This theory underscores the importance of providing culturally competent care. These intervention plan components provide culturally congruent care by considering the patient's cultural practices, beliefs, and values. One of the healthcare technologies relevant to this intervention plan is telemedicine. The second intervention plan component requires the use of telemedicine in post-operative follow-up. All participants will receive phone-based follow-up and optional teleconference consultations to address patient or wound care concerns.
Justification of Intervention Components
Based on Orem's Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory, a personalized patient education plan reduces the patient's and caregiver's self-care deficit. The patient and caregiver will have the skills, knowledge, and attitudes to promote post-operative healing. Patients with knowledge of wound care and self-care routines have lower rates of infections and complications (Turkdogan et al., 2022). A study by Graboyes et al. (2017) demonstrated a direct association between patient education, adherence to the treatment plan, and reduced hospital readmission rates.
Through the videoconferencing and phone-based component, the provider can provide timely diagnosis and adjust the patient's treatment plan to reduce complications. By providing culturally competent care, the provider will provide wound care while reducing unnecessary ER visits or readmissions. A quality improvement study by Shah et al. (2021) demonstrated the efficacy of phone-based wound care and patient follow-ups in reducing head and neck cancer readmissions and ER visits. These two intervention plan components will reduce readmissions as they foster positive patient outcomes, increase patient education, decreases anxiety, and increases patient satisfaction.
Stakeholders, Policy, and Regulations
Various stakeholders, regulations, and policies may impact the proposed intervention plan components. Internal stakeholders of the intervention include the nursing and medical staff in the surgical oncology unit, such as nurses, nurse managers, physicians, surgeons, oncologists, and other clinical assistants. Other clinicians involved in ancillary support include nutritionists, psychologists, and physiotherapists. The internal stakeholders are crucial in implementing the intervention within the selected setting and target population. The hospital's management will be vital in providing leadership and resources to facilitate the intervention plan. Some of the external stakeholders of this intervention plan include the patients and healthcare insurance providers. The patients' participation is crucial as they are the end consumers of the intervention plan components. At the intervention, patient outcomes, such as the 30-day readmission rate, will determine the project's success.
One of the intervention plan components entails the use of videoconferencing as a patient follow-up strategy. Before implementing this intervention, it is crucial to determine whether the healthcare insurer reimburses for telehealth consultations. It is also essential to determine the modalities allowed as some providers only cover videoconferencing, not teleconsultation. The State of Florida allows the provision of telehealth services (Malouff et al., 2021). Out-of-state providers can provide telemedicine services if they acquire the required licenses. The University of Miami Hospital is a crucial stakeholder as the intervention will be carried out in this setting. The hospital has telehealth services through its UHealth Virtual Clinics (UHealth Virtual Clinics, n.d.). These telemedicine regulations at the state and organizational levels make it possible to use telemedicine in the intervention's post-operative follow-up component.
Ethical and Legal Implications
This implementation plan is expected to comply with and adhere to various legal and ethical implications of healthcare practice. These legal and ethical implications are crucial in protecting the patient's rights during the intervention. Some considerations include patient autonomy, confidentiality, nonmaleficence, beneficence, and justice (Varkey, 2021). The intervention will seek authorization from the institution's IRB before implementation. The intervention will demonstrate beneficence and nonmaleficence by showing that the intervention's benefits far outweigh any risks to the patient. Before receiving patient education and enrolling in the phone-based follow-up, all participants must give informed consent. To ensure patient autonomy, all participants will be informed about all the potential benefits and risks of participating in the intervention. To ensure patient confidentiality and privacy, the identity of all participants will be anonymized using identifiers (Shenoy & Appel, 2017). To comply with the ethical principle of justice, participants will be randomly selected and assigned to the intervention and control groups.
At the organizational level, the nursing ad medical staff will be trained and educated on how to comply with these legal and ethical considerations during the intervention. The healthcare team will be trained to implement the intervention without compromising patient confidentiality. They will also be trained to safeguard patient information to ensure only authorized personnel has access. To ensure that the intervention plan is holistic and patient-centered, the organization will provide collaborative channels and resources that comply with ethical and legal issues.
References
Chiesa-Estomba, C. M., Sistiaga-Suárez, J. A., González-García, J. Á., Sarasola, E. L., Vilanova, A. V., & Altuna, X. (2022). Unplanned Hospital Readmission and Visit to the Emergency Room in the First Thirty Days after Head and Neck Surgery: A Prospective, Single-center Study. International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, 26(01), e103–e110. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1730340
Goel, A. N., Raghavan, G., St John, M. A., & Long, J. L. (2019). Risk Factors, Causes, and Costs of Hospital Readmission After Head and Neck Cancer Surgery Reconstruction. JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery, 21(2), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2018.1197
Graboyes, E. M., Kallogjeri, D., Zerega, J., Kukuljan, S., Neal, L., Rosenquist, K. M., & Nussenbaum, B. (2017). Association of a Perioperative Education Program With Unplanned Readmission Following Total Laryngectomy. JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 143(12), 1200–1206. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2017.1460
Jabbour, J., Milross, C., Sundaresan, P., Ebrahimi, A., Shepherd, H. L., Dhillon, H. M., Morgan, G., Ashford, B., Abdul-Razak, M., Wong, E., Veness, M., Palme, C. E., Froggatt, C., Cohen, R., Ekmejian, R., Tay, J., Roshan, D., & Clark, J. R. (2017). Education and support needs in patients with head and neck cancer: A multi-institutional survey. Cancer, 123(11), 1949–1957. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30535
Malouff, T. D., TerKonda, S. P., Knight, D., Abu Dabrh, A. M., Perlman, A. I., Munipalli, B., Dudenkov, D. V., Heckman, M. G., White, L. J., Wert, K. M., Pascual, J. M., Rivera, F. A., Shoaei, M. M., Leak, M. A., Harrell, A. C., Trifiletti, D. M., & Buskirk, S. J. (2021). Physician Satisfaction With Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Mayo Clinic Florida Experience. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. Innovations, Quality & Outcomes, 5(4), 771–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2021.06.006
Shah, M., Douglas, J., Carey, R., Daftari, M., Smink, T., Paisley, A., Cannady, S., Newman, J., & Rajasekaran, K. (2021). Reducing ER Visits and Readmissions after Head and Neck Surgery Through a Phone-based Quality Improvement Program. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 130(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489420937044
Shenoy, A., & Appel, J. M. (2017). Safeguarding Confidentiality in Electronic Health Records. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics: CQ: The International Journal of Healthcare Ethics Committees, 26(2), 337–341. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180116000931
Turkdogan, S., Roy, C. F., Chartier, G., Payne, R., Mlynarek, A., Forest, V.-I., & Hier, M. (2022). Effect of Perioperative Patient Education via Animated Videos in Patients Undergoing Head and Neck Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 148(2), 173–179. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2021.3765
UHealth Virtual Clinics. (n.d.). Retrieved August 31, 2022, from https://umiamihealth.org/en/treatments-and-services/virtual-clinics
Varkey, B. (2021). Principles of Clinical Ethics and Their Application to Practice. Medical Principles and Practice, 30(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1159/000509119
Yip, J. Y. C. (2021). Theory-Based Advanced Nursing Practice: A Practice Update on the Application of Orem’s Self-Care Deficit Nursing Theory. SAGE Open Nursing, 7, 23779608211011990. https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608211011993
,
1
Implementation Plan Design
Name
Capella University
Professor
September, 2022
Implementation Plan Design
The purpose of intervention plans is to utilize an evidence-based approach to achieve practice change and improve patient health outcomes and satisfaction. A successful implementation plan design requires a sound and reasonable approach to translating evidence-based research into clinical practice. This intervention addresses the clinical question of the high 30-day readmission rate for head and neck oncology surgical patients at the University of Miami Hospital. This paper presents an intervention plan design that outlines the management, leadership, delivery technology, stakeholders, policy regulations, and timeline considerations.
Management and Leadership
This intervention requires the collaboration of a multidisciplinary team involved in the management of head and neck oncology patients. Research has established that when compared to fragmented health care, multidisciplinary surgical care results in better health outcomes, reduced healthcare outcomes, and better patient-reported outcomes (Davis et al., 2021). The multidisciplinary team involved is the surgical oncology unit's nursing and medical staff. These include nurses, nurse managers, physicians, surgeons, oncologists, and clinical assistants. Other clinicians involved in ancillary support include nutritionists, clinical psychologists, and physiotherapists. Some of the leadership and management strategies required to promote multidisciplinary collaboration include:
· Collaborative communication: Effective communication channels are required to ensure the success of this intervention plan (Kumar et al., 2019). The project will create communication channels that foster teamwork, morale, and team trust. Some skills that will be encouraged include empathy, active listening, and positive reinforcement through rewards.
· Collaborative practice: All interdisciplinary care team members will have an opportunity to contribute their skills, expertise, and experience to the implementation plan. This ensures that all aspects of the intervention are holistic and patient-centered.
· Shared and collectivistic leadership: This ensures that all resources within the organization are maximized, and individuals with diverse backgrounds are given an opportunity to lead and apply professional judgement (Aufegger et al., 2020). Decisions will be made in an open, honest, and democratic manner, where the common goal is to improve patient outcomes.
Collaboration of a multidisciplinary surgical care team is required to promote the delivery of individualized and high-quality patient care to head and neck cancer patients. Through shared leadership, collaboration, and collectivistic leadership and management strategies, the patients will benefit from the experience and education of different providers (Reid et al., 2021). For instance, the nursing and nutrition team may collaborate to design a treatment plan that promotes wound care and recovery. There will also be decreased medical errors and workflow redundancies, and potential health complications will be identified before they worsen.
Delivery and Technology
This project's organization uses a clinic-based head and neck discharge and follow-up plan. This intervention plan proposes an evidence-based discharge and follow-up bundle with two major components: comprehensive patient education and post-discharge phone-based care and follow-up. To increase project effectiveness, this project will be delivered in four phases. Phase 1 will involve a needs assessment to identify the staff and patient population attitudes and health literacy levels. Phase 2 involves testing and tailoring the proposed head and neck discharge and a follow-up plan to the identified staff and patient needs. Phase 3 involves staff education and training to ensure they understand how to implement the intervention. Phase 4 involves the actual project implementation at the Head and Neck oncology unit. One of the key assumptions of this intervention plan is that the hospital will provide all the resources required to implement the four project phases. These resources include dedicated staff, time, equipment, and resources. Another assumption of the intervention plan is that the needs assessment will demonstrate willingness among the staff to implement a practice change project.
Phases 2 and 3 of this implementation plan require using the internet and internet-based devices. This is because the needs assessment will be conducted using online surveys, while the staff training will be on an online web-based platform. Phase 4 (implementation) entails using a phone-based follow-up call and videoconferencing (optional). Current telemedicine technologies (telephone and video consultations) will be crucial in enhancing the delivery of the intervention plan. During the phone-based follow-up call, the nursing staff uses a post-discharge survey to inquire about the patient's health, schedule post-operative appointments, and request videoconference consultation if needed. One of the emerging healthcare and digital technologies that may support this proposed intervention plan is artificial intelligence (AI). Several studies have established the role of image-based artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms in optimizing wound assessment, care, and healing (Anisuzzaman et al., 2021).
Stakeholders, Policy, and Regulations
The implementation of this intervention plan requires the collaboration of various stakeholders. The internal stakeholders, such as the nurses, surgeons, oncologists, nutritionists, and clinical psychologists, will be responsible for implementing the intervention in the target population and setting. The external stakeholders, such as the patients and healthcare insurers, will be crucial in facilitating the intervention implementation plan design. The patients are core stakeholders of this intervention as they are the target population. Therefore, patient needs must be considered in the intervention plan design. For instance, the patient needs assessment will determine whether the phone-based follow-up will be carried out via phone calls or SMS.
This intervention utilizes post-discharge phone-based care and follow-up intervention, with the option of requesting a videoconference consultation. Because the intervention plan requires telemedicine technology, it must be implemented based on two policy regulations: The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act) of 2009 and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA). These two federal regulations ensure that patient health information is protected and kept confidential (Moore & Frye, 2019). Additionally, the project will seek approval from the University of Miami Hospital IRB by demonstrating adherence to ethical principles and standards. These existing policies will ensure that the intervention plan protects the rights and privacy of the patients.
Timeline
This intervention plan will be implemented for a period of four months (16 weeks) at the Head and Neck oncology unit at the University of Miami Hospital. The first four (4) weeks will be dedicated to conducting a departmental needs assessment, staff education, and troubleshooting the proposed bundle care. The next eight (8) weeks will be allocated for the project execution and implementation. This involves identifying project participants, implementing the oncology unit's discharge and follow-up bundle care, and collecting patient outcomes. Some of the project's primary patient outcomes include the 30-day readmission rate and compliance to wound care protocols. The next four (4) weeks will be allocated for analyzing the collected patient health outcomes to determine the impact of the intervention. During this period, the results of this project will be presented and disseminated to various stakeholders within and outside the organization. Some factors that may negatively impact my projected timeline include institutional bottlenecks, staff resistance, high project attrition rate, lack of required resources, and poor compliance with the project protocol.
References
Anisuzzaman, D. M., Wang, C., Rostami, B., Gopalakrishnan, S., Niezgoda, J., & Yu, Z. (2021). Image-Based Artificial Intelligence in Wound Assessment: A Systematic Review. Advances in Wound Care. https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2021.0091
Aufegger, L., Alabi, M., Darzi, A., & Bicknell, C. (2020). Sharing leadership: Current attitudes, barriers and needs of clinical and non-clinical managers in UK’s integrated care system. BMJ Leader, 4(3), 128–134. https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2020-000228
Davis, M. J., Luu, B. C., Raj, S., Abu-Ghname, A., & Buchanan, E. P. (2021). Multidisciplinary care in surgery: Are team-based interventions cost-effective? The Surgeon: Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland, 19(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2020.02.005
Kumar, H., Morad, R., & Sonsati, M. (2019). Surgical team: Improving teamwork, a review. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 95(1124), 334–339. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2018-135943
Moore, W., & Frye, S. (2019). Review of HIPAA, Part 1: History, Protected Health Information, and Privacy and Security Rules. Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology, 47(4), 269–272. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.119.227819
Reid, M., Lee, A., Urbach, D. R., Kuziemsky, C., Hameed, M., Moloo, H., & Balaa, F. (2021). Shared care in surgery: Practical considerations for surgical leaders. Healthcare Management Forum, 34(2), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0840470420952485
,
2
Lowering Readmission rates for Head and Neck Cancer patients at University of Miami Hospital
Name
Capella University
Professor
September, 2022
Lowering Readmission rates for Head and Neck Cancer patients at University of Miami Hospital
Evaluation of Plan
a. The Goal of the Intervention Plan
This intervention is focused on achieving two major outcomes concerning lowering the admission rates for head and neck cancer patients at the University of Miami Hospital. The first major outcome expected of this project is to reduce wound infections and complications in head and neck cancer patients through patient, family, and/or caregiver education on wound care and proper management of the surgical site. According to Jabbour et al. (2017), head and neck oncology patients present with unique postoperative needs relating to wounds, gastrostomy, and tracheostomy care. By the end of the project, therefore, patient, family, and/or caregiver education having the required skills, knowledge, and attitude, should facilitate faster postoperative healing, thus lowering readmission rates .
Another expected outcome includes an increase in head and neck cancer patient survival rate. According to Chilkuri et al. (2021), compliance with pre-treatment, treatment, and post-treatment can help in increasing the cancer patient's survival rate. The survival rate can be increased by reduced postoperative signs and symptoms such as pain fever nausea and vomiting among other symptoms upon the implementation of the post-discharge care component of the project. This outcome can be attained by the use of telemedicine where the multidisciplinary team at the oncology surgical unit inquires via telephone about the patient's health and address any emerging patient concerns (Jabbour et al., 2017). Video conferencing between the patient or caregiver and the oncologist surgical unit is expected to minimize the 30-day readmission rate for head and neck cancer patients at the facility.
a. Evaluation Plan
Project Outcome Variable |
Indicator |
Quality Improvement |
1. The 30-day Readmission rate for head & neck cancer patients |
2. Patient Satisfaction Score on care provided post-discharge |
|
Education |
1. Number of patients/caregivers/family members educated on wound management & proper management of the surgical site |
Prevention |
1. Rate of post-discharge telemedicine uptake through follow-up on head and neck patients |
2. Head and neck cancer patient survival rate |
Discussion
Advocacy
The nurse plays several critical roles in leading change and driving
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.