This discussion simulates a collaborative ideation process where you will analyze a common user challenge, generate creative solutions, and build on the
Purpose
Empathy, brainstorming, and ideation are essential elements of design thinking, allowing teams to generate creative solutions to user-centered challenges. In this discussion, you will engage in a hands-on design thinking exercise, practicing brainstorming and ideation techniques while collaborating with peers to refine and enhance innovative ideas.
Task
This discussion simulates a collaborative ideation process where you will analyze a common user challenge, generate creative solutions, and build on the ideas of your peers. Your work here will serve as a foundation for a future assignment.
Step 1: Explore the Challenge (Individual Work)
We have all waited in line and thought, I could be doing something else right now or there has to be a better way. For this brainstorming session, you will focus on the following challenge:
Improving the waiting experience: Redesign the experience of waiting in line to make it enjoyable and efficient.
In your initial post, address the following:
- Identify the User Group. Articulate the specific user group you are targeting for your challenge. What is the user waiting in line for?
- Empathize with User Pain Points. Using empathy, briefly describe one or two pain points this user group might experience while waiting in line.
- Generate Creative Ideas
- Propose three ideas to address the challenge. Use a brainstorming technique such as mind mapping, SCAMPER, or rapid ideation to generate your solutions.
- Indicate which technique you used and briefly describe how it helped you generate your ideas.
Step 2: Build on Ideas (Collaborative Work)
In your responses to peers:
- Enhance Ideas. Select at least one idea from your peer’s post and build upon it by suggesting enhancements or alternatives.
- How can the idea be made more user-friendly, efficient, or innovative?
- What additional features or perspectives might improve the solution?
- Provide Feedback. Offer feedback on their understanding of the user’s pain points:
- Do the proposed solutions effectively address the identified pain points?
- What empathy-driven insights could strengthen their approach?
Submission
- Post your initial response outlining your challenge, user group, pain points, and three ideas by 11:59 p.m. ET on Saturday.
- Respond to at least two classmates by 11:59 p.m. ET on Tuesday, building on their ideas and providing constructive feedback.
Criteria for Success
Discussion participation is graded using a rubric based on the following criteria:
- Quality
- Quantity
- Timeliness
- Writing
- For more information, review the Discussion Rubric.
Student Resource
Chapter 10: Creating new products and services
Chapter 10: Creating new products and services
• In the following PowerPoint slides you will find the key headings from CHAPTER 10 together with the main illustrations, tables, etc.
• There are also slides summarizing the key messages in bullet-point fashion, and a wide range of activities which you can use to help students explore around these themes.
• Finally there are some reflection questions which can be used as the basis for discussion or assignments.
Learning Objectives
By the end of this chapter you will develop an understanding of:
• a formal process to support new product development, such as stage- gate and the development funnel
• product and organizational factors which influence success and failure
• choosing and applying relevant tools to support each stage of product development
• the differences between products and services and how these influence development
• applying the lessons of diffusion research to promote the adoption of innovations.
Core themes and material
from the book
Implementation as a journey
The development funnel
Figure 10.2 of the book presents the ‘development funnel’ showing that there is a structure in place which reviews both technical and marketing data at each stage
A simplified 4 stage model
• Concept generation – identifying the opportunities for new products and services.
• Project assessment and selection – screening and choosing projects which satisfy certain criteria.
• Product or service development – translating the selected concepts into a physical product or a new service.
• Product or service commercialization – testing, launching and marketing the new product or service.
Project selection
Two filters:
Aggregate product plan – attempts to integrate the various potential projects to ensure that the collective set of development projects meet the goals and objectives of the firm, and help to build the capabilities needed.
Developing specific product concepts. The two most common processes at this level are the development funnel and the stage gate system.
Product development
This stage includes all the activities necessary to take the chosen concept and deliver a product or service for commercialization.
Success factors in new product development
• Product advantage
• Market knowledge
• Clear product definition
• Risk assessment
• Project organization
• Project resources
• Proficiency of execution
• Top management support
Winning at new products
Product development influential factors
Concept generation
On the Portal there are several tools to help with concept generation, for example:
Design methods Creativity tools Competitiveness profiling Value curves Lead user methods Market research tools
See https://johnbessant.org/tools-for-innovation-and- entrepreneurship/
Concept generation
Follow the link below to hear a podcast on how market research marked a shift from a producer-led to a consumer- led approach to business
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/w3csv3gm
Quality function deployment
• Identify customer requirements, primary and secondary, and any major dislikes.
• Rank requirements according to importance.
• Translate requirements into measurable characteristics.
• Establish the relationship between the customer requirements and technical product characteristics, and estimate the strength of the relationship.
• Choose appropriate units of measurement and determine target values based on customer requirements and competitor benchmarks.
QFD matrix
Figure 11.5 of the book presents QFD matrix that
was originally developed in Japan and claimed to have helped Toyota reduce its development time and
costs by 40 %
Differences between products and services
• Tangibility. • Perceptions of service quality:
• tangible aspects; • responsiveness; • competence; • assurance; • empathy.
• Simultaneity. • Storage. • Customer contact. • Location.
Characteristics of service innovators
Characteristics of service innovators continued
Success factors in service innovation: the SPOTS model
SPOTS model
There is a full description of the model on the Portal
https://johnbessant.org/tools-for-innovation-and- entrepreneurship/
Diffusion of innovations
• Diffusion is the means by which innovations are translated into social and economic benefits.
• We know that the impact of the use of innovations is around four times that of their generation
• However, the benefits of innovations can take 10–15 years to be fully effected, and in practice most innovations fail to be adopted widely, and so have limited social or economic impact.
Rogers’ definition
Rogers’ definition of diffusion is used widely:
‘the process by which an innovation is communicated through certain channels over time among members of a social system. It is a special type of communication, in that the messages are concerned with new ideas’
Rogers’ 3 types of innovation decision
• Individual, in which the individual is the main decision-maker, independent of peers. Decisions may still be influenced by social norms and interpersonal relationships, but the individual makes the ultimate choice. For example, the purchase of a consumer durable such as a mobile phone.
Rogers’ 3 types of innovation decision
• Collective, where choices are made jointly with others in the social system, and there is significant peer pressure or formal requirement to conform. For example, the sorting and recycling of domestic waste.
• Authoritative, where decisions to adopt are taken by a few individuals within a social system, owing to their power, status or expertise (e.g. adoption of ERP systems by businesses, or MRI systems by hospitals).
Models of diffusion
In practice the precise pattern of adoption of an innovation will depend on the interaction of demand-side and supply-side factors:
• Demand-side factors – direct contact with or imitation of prior adopters, adopters with different perceptions of benefits and risk.
• Supply-side factors – relative advantage of an innovation, availability of information, barriers to adoption, feedback between developers and users.
The S-curve
Barriers to adoption
• economic – personal costs versus social benefits, access to information, insufficient incentives
• behavioural – priorities, motivations, rationality, inertia, propensity for change or risk
• organizational – goals, routines, power and influence, culture and stakeholders
• structural – infrastructure, sunk costs, governance.
Factors affecting diffusion
In predicting the rate of adoption of an innovation, five factors explain 49–87% of the variance:
• relative advantage • compatibility • complexity • trialability • observability.
Relative advantage
• Relative advantage is the degree to which an innovation is perceived as better than the product it supersedes, or competing products.
• Typically measured in narrow economic terms, for example cost or financial payback
• Non-economic factors such as convenience, satisfaction and social prestige may be equally important.
Attributes of innovation
• Primary attributes, such as size and cost, are invariant and inherent to a specific innovation irrespective of the adopter.
• Secondary attributes, such as relative advantage and compatibility, may vary from adopter to adopter, being contingent upon the perceptions and context of adopters.
Compatibility
• Compatibility is the degree to which an innovation is perceived to be consistent with the existing values, experience and needs of potential adopters.
• Two distinct aspects of compatibility:
• existing skills and practices, • and values and norms.
• Few innovations initially fit the user environment into which they are introduced. Significant misalignments between the innovation and the adopting organization will require changes in the innovation or organization, or, in the most successful cases of implementation, mutual adaptation of both.
Complexity
• Complexity is the degree to which an innovation is perceived as being difficult to understand or use.
• In general, innovations which are simpler for potential users to understand will be adopted more rapidly than those which require the adopter to develop new skills and knowledge.
Trialability
• Trialability is the degree to which an innovation can be experimented with on a limited basis.
• An innovation that is trialable represents less uncertainty to potential adopters, and allows learning by doing. Innovations which can be trialled will generally be adopted more quickly than those which cannot.
• Sometimes called ‘divisibility’ – how far can the risk of adoption be broken down into small steps rather than requiring a full commitment at the outset
Observability
• Observability is the degree to which the results of an innovation are visible to others.
• The easier it is for others to see the benefits of an innovation, the more likely it will be adopted.
• The simple epidemic model of diffusion assumes that innovations spread as potential adopters come into contact with existing users of an innovation.
Checklist: Relative advantage
• How well does my plan show how much better off people will be when they adopt it? • Why is this plan better than what has been done before? • What advantages or benefits may there be to accepting the plan? • Who will gain from the implementation of the plan? • How will I (or others) be rewarded by adopting the plan? • How can I emphasize the plan’s benefits to all?
Checklist: Compatibility
• How well does my plan demonstrate that it is compatible with current values, past experiences and needs?
• Is the plan consistent with current practice?
• Does the plan meet the needs of a particular group?
• Does it offer better ways to reach our common goals?
• Who will naturally support and agree with the plan?
• Can it be favourably named, packaged or presented?
Checklist: Trialability
• How well does my plan allow for trialability?
• Can the plan be tried out or tested?
• Can uncertainty be reduced?
• Can we begin with a few parts of the plan?
• How can others be encouraged to try out the plan?
• Can the plan be modified by you or others?
Checklist: Complexity
• How well does my plan provide for easy communication, comprehension and use?
• Is the plan easy for others to understand? • Can it be explained clearly to many different people? • Will the plan be easily communicated? • How can the plan be made more simple or easy to
understand? • Is the plan easy to use or follow?
Checklist: Observability
• How well does my plan provide results that are easily observed and visible to others?
• Is the plan easy for others to find or obtain?
• Can the plan be made more visible to others?
• How can I make the plan easier for others to see?
• Will others be able to see the effects of the plan?
• Are there good reasons for not making the entire plan visible?
Checklist: Other factors
• What other resources will I need; how can I get them?
• What obstacles exist; how can we prevent or overcome them?
• What new challenges will be created; and dealt with?
• How can I encourage commitment to the plan?
• What feedback about the plan is needed?
• The process of innovation is much more complex than technology responding to market signals. Effective business planning under conditions of uncertainty demands a thorough understanding and management of the dynamics of innovation, including conception, development, adoption and diffusion.
Summary
• The adoption and diffusion of an innovation depend on the characteristics of the innovation, the nature of potential adopters and the process of communication. The relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability and observability of an innovation all affect the rate of diffusion.
Summary
• Forecasting the development and adoption of innovations is difficult, but participative methods such as Delphi and scenario planning are highly relevant to innovation and sustainability. In such cases the process of forecasting, including consultation and debate, is probably more important than the precise outcomes of the exercise.
Summary
Summary
There is a vast amount of management research on the
subject of new product and service development, and we
are now pretty certain what works and what does not.
There are no guarantees that following the suggestions in
this chapter will produce a blockbuster product, service
or business, but if these elements are not managed well,
your chances of success will be much lower. This is not
supposed to discourage experimentation and calculated
risk-taking but rather to provide a foundation for
evidence-based practice.
Summary
Research suggests that a range of factors affect the success of a potential new product or service:
• Some factors are product-specific (e.g. product advantage, clear target market and attention to pre- development activities).
• Other factors are more about the organizational context and process (e.g. senior management support, formal process and use of external knowledge).
Summary
• A formal process for new product and service development should consist of distinct stages, such as concept development, business case, product development, pilot and commercialization, separated by distinct decision points, or gates, which have clear criteria, such as product fit and product advantages.
Summary
• Different stages of the process demand different criteria and different tools and methods. Useful tools and methods at the concept stage include segmentation, experimentation, focus groups and customer partnering; and at the development stage useful tools include prototyping, design for production and QFD.
Summary
• Services and products are different in a number of ways, especially intangibility and perceived benefits, and so will demand the adaptation of the standard models and prescriptions for new product development.
• The relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability and observability of an innovation all affect the rate of diffusion.
Videos
There are several videos which can help explore and present the key themes of the chapter:
• Project implementation
• Stage gates in implementation
• Success and failure in implementation
• Agile implementation
• Interview with Catherina van Delden, Innosabi about agile innovation
Media: NPD challenges
On the Portal there is a video showing Joe Tidd talking about the challenges of organizing new product development:
Media: NPD challenges
On the Portal there is a video interview with Armin Rau, Strategy Partner of Sicap, talking about some of the innovation management challenges in working in the fast-moving world of software for mobile devices. Transcript of the interview is also available.
http://www.innovation-portal.info/?s=armin+Rau+
http://www.innovation-portal.info/resources/armin-rau- interview-transcript/
Media: Why products fail
On the Portal there is a video showing Joe Tidd talking about some of the reasons for product failure
Media: New product development
Follow the link below to listen to an interview with James Dyson
https://www.acast.com/howibuiltthis/dyson-james- dyson
Tools to help project selection – financial methods
• Discounted cash flows, such as net present value/internal rate of return.
• Cost-benefit analysis.
• Simple calculations of the payback period.
Tools to help project selection – non-financial methods
• Ranking.
• Profiles.
• Simulated outcomes.
• Strategic clusters.
• Interactive.
Tools to help product development
• Design for Manufacture (DFM).
• Rapid Prototyping.
• Computer-aided Techniques (CAD/CAM).
• Quality Function Deployment (QFD). For more on QFD see the toolbox:
•http://www.innovation-portal.info/resources/quality- function-deployment-qfd/
Tool: Risk assessment matrix
On the Portal there is a description of this tool to help assess complexity issues
http://www.innovation-portal.info/resources/risk- assessment-matrix/
Accelerating diffusion
On the Portal there is a tool describing the use of models to help think about accelerating diffusion.
http://www.innovation- portal.info/toolkits/accelerating-diffusion/
There is also an activity linked to this
http://www.innovation- portal.info/resources/accelerating-diffusion-activity/
- Slide 1: Student Resource
- Slide 2: Chapter 10: Creating new products and services
- Slide 3: Learning Objectives
- Slide 4: Core themes and material from the book
- Slide 5
- Slide 6
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Slide 9
- Slide 10
- Slide 11
- Slide 12
- Slide 13
- Slide 14
- Slide 15
- Slide 16
- Slide 17
- Slide 18
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- Slide 23
- Slide 24
<l
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
