By end of day on Wednesday, submit: Final revised version of Part 1: Argument to your Opposing Audience
Need help with this assignment?Get an original answer from a qualified tutor — from $10/page.
Get it written →By end of day on Wednesday, submit:
Final revised version of Part 1: Argument to your Opposing Audience
Final revised version of Part 2: Argument to your Like-Minded Audience
Self-Analysis Contrast Essay.
To Submit:
Download all your work from Google Docs into a PDF.
Note: only PDFs will be accepted.
When you click START ASSIGNMENT, choose Browse My Computer
Attach ALL THREE documents by clicking ADD ANOTHER FILE
Only submit when all 3 parts are attached as PDFs.
Please try NOT to submit a second or third attempt. It overwrites e9xisting submitted work and then I can’t find them.
Rubric
Module 2 Grading
Module 2 Grading
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting/DesignGenre Appropriate, real world formatting
Appealing to the eye for medium of publication (print, digital, etc)
Hyperlinks/use of evidence is smooth and effective for genre
20 to >19.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Goes above and beyond.
19 to >16.0 pts
Strong
Good choices.
16 to >15.0 pts
Effective
Mostly meets the assignment goals but may be weak or underdeveloped.
15 to >13.0 pts
Developing
Attempts to meet assignment goals but has a variety of weaknesses or problems in execution.
13 to >0 pts
No Marks
Totally missing or clearly misunderstanding the assignment.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 1: Writing to the OppositionDirectly Address opposition’s view. Critique their position. Make your own claim, creating a rebuttal or refutation. End with goodwill. Use evidence effectively.
40 to >36.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Goes above and beyond .
36 to >34.0 pts
Strong
Meets assignment goals effectively, though possibly without finesse, style, or insights.
34 to >30.0 pts
Effective
Mostly meets the assignment goals but may be weak or underdeveloped.
30 to >28.0 pts
Developing
Attempts to meet assignment goals but has a variety of weaknesses or problems in execution
28 to >0 pts
No Marks
Totally missing or clearly misunderstanding the assignment.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 2: Writing to the Like-Minded AudienceBuild a relationship with Your audience. Give reasons for further action. Give clear next steps/goals for moving forward. Effectively use evidence to inspire.
40 to >36.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Goes above and beyond .
36 to >34.0 pts
Strong
Meets assignment goals effectively, though possibly without finesse, style, or insights.
34 to >30.0 pts
Effective
Mostly meets the assignment goals but may be weak or underdeveloped.
30 to >28.0 pts
Developing
Attempts to meet assignment goals but has a variety of weaknesses or problems in execution
28 to >0 pts
No Marks
Totally missing or clearly misunderstanding the assignment.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3: Self-AnalysisIdentify and explain each audience group (do more than identify them. Explain their values, biases, and expectations). Analyze WHY you had to make different choices based on your knowledge of the target audiences
Contrast how your knowledge/awareness of the DIFFERENCES in target audiences’ identity, values, biases, and expectations to explain WHY the techniques had to be different.
Analyze HOW the techniques affected each audience differently, but still supported your overall position on the topic.
80 to >72.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Goes above and beyond .
72 to >68.0 pts
Strong
Meets assignment goals effectively, though possibly without finesse, style, or insights.
68 to >60.0 pts
Effective
Mostly meets the assignment goals but may be weak or underdeveloped.
60 to >56.0 pts
Developing
Attempts to meet assignment goals but has a variety of weaknesses or problems in execution
56 to >0 pts
No Marks
Totally missing or clearly misunderstanding the assignment.
80 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity and Analytical LanguageClearly edited for grammar, verb tenses, sentence structure, spelling, and other proofreading skills. Language is clear and easy to read and appropriate for the context/community.
20 to >19.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Style and flair.
19 to >16.0 pts
Strong
Clear and concise.
16 to >15.0 pts
Effective
Mostly clear but a few consistent problems.
15 to >13.0 pts
Developing
Lots of grammar/editing errors showing widespread weaknesses in proofreading.
13 to >0 pts
No Marks
Not in English.
20 pts
Total Points: 200
Get a plagiarism-free answer to this question
Send us your instructions and we’ll match you with the best writer in your subject.
- 100% human-written, zero AI
- Turnitin report included
- Confidential — we never share your data
- Free revisions & refunds