ASIAN PHILOSPHY

 

) together withthe Hegelian model can help you look at distinct seemingly opposing

approaches to one issue in your own

area of study or one issue/event in public areas of contemporary times.

how to look at contraries

) together withthe Hegelian model can help you look at distinct seemingly opposing

approaches to one issue in your own

area of study or one issue/event in public areas of contemporary times.

how to look at contraries

) together withthe Hegelian model can help you look at distinct seemingly opposing

approaches to one issue in your own

area of study or one issue/event in public areas of contemporary times.

how to look at contraries

) together withthe Hegelian model can help you look at distinct seemingly opposing

approaches to one issue in your own

area of study or one issue/event in public areas of contemporary times.

Briefly present (no more than) major points of theYinYang

way of

thinking, especially its distinct crucial features

(emphases) in contrast to the distinct crucial features

(emphases) of the Hegelian model (also briefly presented), as they

are specified

 

briefly present each of the two distinct approaches

: <i>

Identify and present some element in each approach that you would render 

reasonable or correct for example , itsperspective dimensionthat ineligible in the

ense that it points to and captures some aspect of the object of study That Needs due

attention/treatment , rather than being ignored, in a more complete account of the

object of study Dentify and present some element(s) in each approach 

that you would render

unreasonable or incorrect For Example its guiding principle dimension

regarding how to look at relation between its own Eligible perspective and the other

Eligible perspective from the other approach might be inadequate when

 it dismisses other eligible perspectives

Apply theYin-Yang

way of thinking together with the Hegelian model to give your analysis of how we should

adequatelylook at the relation

between the two seemingly

opposing approaches to the issue under

examination:Apply the Hegelian model (through its

synthesis via

Sublation To keep what are reasonable or correct in

the two approaches while discarding what not

Apply the

YinYangmodel (through its seeking complementarity

and thus reaching harmonious balance)

to have those reasonable or correct elements

sublated

from the two approaches to the issue to

complementarily work together to enhance your understanding and treatment of t

he issue

.

Explain how the YinYang way of thinking (the YinYang model of

how to look at contraries

) together withthe Hegelian model can help you look at distinct seemingly opposing

approaches to one issue in your own

area of study or one issue/event in public areas of contemporary times.

Briefly present (no more than) major points of theYinYang

way of

thinking, especially its distinct crucial features

(emphases) in contrast to the distinct crucial features

(emphases) of the Hegelian model (also briefly presented), as they

are specified

 

briefly present each of the two distinct approaches

: <i>

Identify and present some element in each approach that you would render 

reasonable or correct for example , itsperspective dimensionthat ineligible in the

ense that it points to and captures some aspect of the object of study That Needs due

attention/treatment , rather than being ignored, in a more complete account of the

object of study Dentify and present some element(s) in each approach 

that you would render

unreasonable or incorrect For Example its guiding principle dimension

regarding how to look at relation between its own Eligible perspective and the other

Eligible perspective from the other approach might be inadequate when

 it dismisses other eligible perspectives

Apply theYin-Yang

way of thinking together with the Hegelian model to give your analysis of how we should

adequatelylook at the relation

between the two seemingly

opposing approaches to the issue under

examination:Apply the Hegelian model (through its

synthesis via

Sublation To keep what are reasonable or correct in

the two approaches while discarding what not

Apply the

YinYangmodel (through its seeking complementarity

and thus reaching harmonious balance)

to have those reasonable or correct elements

sublated

from the two approaches to the issue to

complementarily work together to enhance your understanding and treatment of t

he issue

 

.

) together withthe Hegelian model can help you look at distinct seemingly opposing

approaches to one issue in your own

area of study or one issue/event in public areas of contemporary times.

Briefly present (no more than) major points of theYinYang

way of

thinking, especially its distinct crucial features

(emphases) in contrast to the distinct crucial features

(emphases) of the Hegelian model (also briefly presented), as they

are specified

 

briefly present each of the two distinct approaches

: <i>

Identify and present some element in each approach that you would render 

reasonable or correct for example , itsperspective dimensionthat ineligible in the

ense that it points to and captures some aspect of the object of study That Needs due

attention/treatment , rather than being ignored, in a more complete account of the

object of study Dentify and present some element(s) in each approach 

that you would render

unreasonable or incorrect For Example its guiding principle dimension

regarding how to look at relation between its own Eligible perspective and the other

Eligible perspective from the other approach might be inadequate when

 it dismisses other eligible perspectives

Apply theYin-Yang

way of thinking together with the Hegelian model to give your analysis of how we should

adequatelylook at the relation

between the two seemingly

opposing approaches to the issue under

examination:Apply the Hegelian model (through its

synthesis via

Sublation To keep what are reasonable or correct in

the two approaches while discarding what not

Apply the

YinYangmodel (through its seeking complementarity

and thus reaching harmonious balance)

to have those reasonable or correct elements

sublated

from the two approaches to the issue to

complementarily work together to enhance your understanding and treatment of t

he issue

.