The Evolution and Impact of Telemedicine: Pre-COVID-19 Era to the Present and Beyond
Reflecting back to the outcomes predicted in your Week 5 assignment and the evaluative criteria applied in your Week 6 assignment, write a 5-paragraph essay describing the true value or the extent to which each of the 3 proposed policies can improve (or worsen) the problem. For example, discuss which may be more cost effective vs. which may serve more people. Essays should range 400-600 words in length utilizing APA format and at least 2 scholarly references.
Requirements: 400-600 words
Telemedicine & COVID-19
Vinsetta Buford
American Military University
HCAD 501: Technology Applications in Healthcare Organizations
Dr. Jeremy Howell
07 Aug 2023
The Evolution and Impact of Telemedicine: Pre-COVID-19 Era to the Present and Beyond
The COVID-19 pandemic was crucial in telemedicine’s growth from a specialized technique to a general healthcare delivery paradigm. Telemedicine provides medical treatments remotely using telecommunications technologies (Jagarapu & Savani, 2021). This research aims to investigate the pre-pandemic environment of telemedicine, the challenges it faced, the causes promoting its widespread adoption during the pandemic, the methods used to allay early concerns, and the future course of telemedicine. This study attempts to give a complete overview of the history of telemedicine, its pandemic-induced metamorphosis, and the opportunities it has for influencing the future of healthcare delivery by looking at these factors.
Utilization of Telemedicine Prior to the COVID-19 Pandemic
Before the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine had a tiny foothold in the United States. Despite its promise to revolutionize healthcare delivery, its acceptance and incorporation into standard medical practices have been constrained by several problems. The absence of uniform coverage policies across insurers and states was a significant hurdle. Healthcare professionals and patients alike experienced ambiguity due to differences in how telemedicine services were paid for and reimbursed (Metzger et al., 2021). The need for standardized coverage hampered the motivation for medical practices to invest in telemedicine infrastructure and provide these services on a larger scale.
Additionally, one of the significant challenges was the high initial expenses related to telemedicine systems. Healthcare organizations had to pay for technology acquisition and integration, personnel training, and regulatory compliance. These expenses often prevented many smaller practices with insufficient resources from pursuing telemedicine, preventing telemedicine’s widespread acceptance. The need for process modifications within healthcare institutions partly influenced the moderate use of telemedicine. It was necessary to reevaluate patient management procedures, appointment scheduling, data exchange, and clinician-patient interactions to integrate telemedicine into current workflows (Metzger et al., 2021). Such changes presented difficulties in terms of time and effort, further impeding rapid and extensive integration.
The slow adoption of telemedicine was primarily due to clinician acceptability and preparation. Many medical professionals were used to receiving consultations and treatments in person. Some doctors were unwilling to adapt to the learning curve and change in practice dynamics that came with the transition to virtual care. Both patient participation and interest were essential components. While some patients were anxious to investigate the practicality of telemedicine, others had doubts about the kind of care they could get from a distance (Jagarapu & Savani, 2021). Additionally, some people were deterred from using virtual healthcare services by worries about data security and privacy.
Barriers and Concerns
The use of telemedicine encountered several obstacles prior to the COVID-19 epidemic that prevented its mainstream acceptance. Patients and healthcare professionals were concerned about the security of sensitive medical information conveyed via digital means, which raised privacy issues. Medical personnel struggled with fragmented technological interfaces that made it challenging to coordinate patients’ treatment effectively, which made the absence of seamless interaction with current healthcare systems an even more significant barrier to telemedicine adoption (Metzger et al., 2021).
Furthermore, a significant barrier was the need for more data exchange for ongoing patient care. The anticipated advantages of telemedicine in permitting smooth transitions between virtual and in-person treatment remain to be met, given the absence of solid methods for exchanging patient data across multiple healthcare contexts (Curfman et al., 2021). The widespread lack of understanding of telemedicine services among medical professionals and patient groups has hampered its adoption as a practical substitute for conventional in-person treatment.
Technical literacy gaps among patients have become a significant worry, especially for older adults or those needing more digital technology exposure. It was not always easy for people to use telemedicine platforms and participate successfully in remote consultations, thereby excluding disadvantaged groups from this method of healthcare delivery (Metzger et al., 2021). Additionally, the expensive initial cost of implementing technology served as a disincentive for healthcare organizations, especially smaller practices, which struggled with financial limitations that prevented the adoption of telemedicine solutions.
Widespread Adoption of Telemedicine during the Pandemic
The COVID-19 pandemic was a pivotal turning point in healthcare delivery, necessitating quick adjustments to protect patient safety and unrestricted access to vital medical treatment. Telemedicine, which had previously served as a complementary tool but has now seen a boom in usage, has emerged as an essential answer to this situation. Changes in federal and state policy were essential to this development. An easing of constraints on Medicare telehealth coverage was the federal government’s reaction. This critical decision reduced the danger of exposure by allowing people to seek medical care from the comfort of their homes. In parallel, regulatory agencies like the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) acknowledged the gravity of the issue. They temporarily relaxed telehealth-related rules (Curfman et al., 2021). More adaptable telemedicine procedures were made possible by the HHS’s decision to waive the enforcement of some Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) provisions, and patients’ access to medications was uninterrupted thanks to the DEA’s relaxation of e-prescribing rules for controlled substances.
States have shown their dedication to increasing the use of telehealth by proposing several initiatives. In order to ensure that disadvantaged people may continue to obtain medical treatment without putting themselves in excessive danger, this included the extension of Medicaid telehealth coverage. Many governments have relaxed licensing requirements to address the provider side of the issue, allowing medical professionals to deliver telemedicine services across state boundaries (Charman et al., 2021). States also encouraged the use of telemedicine by recognizing the value of written permission in the context of online healthcare services.
The widespread understanding that sustaining traditional healthcare delivery paradigms in the face of a highly infectious virus was unworkable sparked the pandemic-induced push for telemedicine adoption. States’ proactive extension of Medicaid coverage and licensing flexibility, along with federal relaxation of Medicare telehealth requirements, regulatory modifications by agencies like the DEA and HHS, and state proactive expansion of Medicaid coverage, all worked together to create a unified framework that enabled telemedicine to thrive (Curfman et al., 2021). This approach provided access to healthcare for those who needed it right away and set the stage for a paradigm change in how healthcare is delivered.
Addressing Prior Concerns
Healthcare organizations responded quickly to the COVID-19 epidemic, which helped allay worries that had previously prevented the broad use of telemedicine. Institutions made large financial expenditures and staff changes after realizing the need to integrate telehealth technologies. Despite being crucial in extending the scope of telemedicine, these changes also brought forth a new set of difficulties. Notably, the move to telemedicine sparked concerns regarding patient confidentiality and the maintenance of high-quality healthcare services. Healthcare professionals struggled to maintain the same standard of care that in-person consultations had typically delivered while protecting sensitive patient data as they navigate this unfamiliar environment (Charman et al., 2021).
The pandemic’s aggressive settlement of service and payment parity problems was one of its significant successes. Policymakers were able to increase access to telehealth services by resolving these issues and giving healthcare providers a financial incentive to adopt this new care delivery method. This accomplishment was not without its share of criticism, however. The rise of telemedicine raised budgetary concerns because of the high expenses involved in implementing new technology and providing services (Curfman et al., 2021). The need to balance offering affordable, high-quality healthcare and budgetary sustainability has become a paramount concern.
The epidemic also brought to light ongoing differences in patient groups’ access to and use of technology. Despite widespread advocacy for telemedicine, certain sections of the population encountered obstacles because they needed more access to digital equipment, internet connection, and technical knowledge. Existing healthcare inequities were compounded by the digital divide, which also created questions about fair access to healthcare (Bestsennyy et al., 2021). The inability of vulnerable and marginalized groups to fully engage in telehealth consultations can exacerbate already-existing healthcare disparities.
Future Outlook of Telemedicine
The future of telemedicine is poised for extraordinary change, offering the possibility of changing healthcare delivery in both urban and rural settings, increasing medical accessibility while at the same time reducing costs. Forecasts show a bright future for the worldwide telehealth and telemedicine industry, driven by a favorable Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) that denotes a rapidly expanding market (Curfman et al., 2021). Despite these promising predictions, there are still unresolved issues in the US, such as the problem of insufficient reimbursement rates and enduring barriers to interstate licensing.
The ability of telemedicine to eliminate geographical obstacles and provide universal access to healthcare regardless of a person’s location is its most significant promise. Telemedicine may provide virtual links between patients and medical professionals in rural or underserved locations where there may be gaps in the infrastructure for traditional healthcare, providing prompt treatments and preventative care. Additionally, the financial burden of conventional in-person healthcare services may be significantly reduced because of telemedicine’s cost-effectiveness (Bestsennyy et al., 2021). Telemedicine has the potential to significantly reduce costs for both healthcare professionals and patients by reducing the requirement for physical infrastructure and simplifying administrative procedures.
Unquestionably optimistic predictions are made for the telehealth and telemedicine industry, supported by a robust CAGR. This bodes well for the development of technology, novel solutions, and better patient experiences. The rise in demand and acceptability of telehealth services during the epidemic has spurred industry participants to invest in improving user experiences, extending service offerings, and correcting the shortcomings that were once adoption obstacles (Curfman et al., 2021). There is significant potential for developing integrated platforms that seamlessly link patients, healthcare providers, electronic health records, and wearable health devices, leading to delivering holistic and personalized healthcare as telemedicine technologies advance.
However, despite the positive trend, there are still difficulties in the US telemedicine market. The problem of reimbursement rates is one significant barrier. The financial feasibility of telemedicine services for healthcare practitioners should be improved by telehealth interactions, often getting less compensation than in-person appointments. Furthermore, the lack of standard rules and nationwide licensing limitations presents complications that obstruct smooth care delivery across state boundaries (Curfman et al., 2021). The spread of telemedicine services is constrained by this need for more harmonization, especially when addressing patients’ requirements across regional borders.
Furthermore, it is still being determined if the enhanced use of telemedicine will continue after the epidemic. Although the crisis hastened acceptance, it remains to be seen if telemedicine will maintain its increased importance when the urgent need fades. Another significant difficulty is providing fair access for marginalized people. The promise of telemedicine may only partially be realized in certain areas due to disparities in technology availability, digital literacy, and socioeconomic considerations (Bestsennyy et al., 2021). To address these disparities, a deliberate effort is needed to close the digital divide and ensure that those most in need may benefit from telemedicine.
Conclusion
Telemedicine has the ability to revolutionize how healthcare is delivered, as seen by how it has developed from its pre-pandemic restrictions to its extensive use during the COVID-19 crisis. The healthcare industry needed to adapt and make substantial legislative changes to address pre-existing issues and impediments. Telemedicine has a promising future because of its ability to close healthcare access gaps, enhance patient outcomes, and reshape the way medical services are delivered. However, issues with payment and fair access should be carefully addressed.
References
Bestsennyy, O., Gilbert, G., Harris, A., & Rost, J. (2021). Telehealth: a quarter-trillion-dollar post-COVID-19 reality. McKinsey & Company, p. 9.
Charman, S. J., Velicki, L., Okwose, N. C., Harwood, A., McGregor, G., Ristic, A., … & Jakovljevic, D. G. (2021). Insights into heart failure hospitalizations, management, and services during and beyond COVID‐19. ESC heart failure, 8(1), 175–182.
Curfman, A., McSwain, S. D., Chuo, J., Yeager-McSwain, B., Schinasi, D. A., Marcin, J., … & Olson, C. A. (2021). Pediatric telehealth in the COVID-19 pandemic era and beyond. Pediatrics, 148(3).
Jagarapu, J., & Savani, R. C. (2021, August). A brief history of telemedicine and the evolution of teleneonatology. In Seminars in Perinatology (Vol. 45, No. 5, p. 151416). WB Saunders.
Metzger, G. A., Cooper, J., Lutz, C., Jatana, K. R., Nishimura, L., Deans, K. J., … & Halaweish, I. (2021). The value of telemedicine for the pediatric surgery patient in the time of COVID-19 and beyond. Journal of pediatric surgery, 56(8), 1305-1311.
Evaluative Criteria
Vinsetta Buford
American Military University
NURS505: Healthcare Systems and Health Policy
Dr. Michelle Lenox
14 August 2023
Evaluative Criteria
Texas is experiencing a crisis in mental health, and many people find it difficult to get the treatment and assistance they need. Several policies have been suggested to deal with this problem. Effectiveness, efficiency, equality, acceptability, feasibility, affordability, legality, and accountability are the eight-evaluation criteria Collins (2005) stated for evaluating health programs. This essay evaluates the three recommended approaches for tackling the mental health epidemic in Texas based on these criteria.
Increased financing for mental health care was the first policy. Increasing access to treatment and improving outcomes for people with mental health issues are both expected consequences of this approach. It could also be effective if the monies are distributed in a manner that optimizes their impact. However, how the money is allocated and whether it reaches underprivileged communities will determine how equitable this program is. Depending on how people feel about spending on the government and mental health, this approach may or may not be deemed acceptable (Wells et al., 2019). This policy’s viability and cost depend on the money’s availability and politicians’ willingness to devote it to mental health care. This policy’s legitimacy would be governed by the existing laws and rules regarding healthcare financing. Finally, in order to guarantee that the monies are used appropriately, accountability procedures need to be implemented.
The development of telemedicine programs was the second policy that was suggested. For those living in distant or underdeveloped locations, this strategy may help increase access to healthcare. Additionally, it might be effective by cutting expenditures and travel time for patients and physicians. Whether telemedicine services are available to everyone, regardless of region or socioeconomic position, would determine how equitable this policy is. Whether or not the public will embrace this approach depends on how they feel about technology and virtual healthcare. This policy’s viability and cost depend on the infrastructure and technology required for telemedicine initiatives. The telemedicine-related laws and rules in effect when this policy was implemented, would determine its legality (Collins, 2005). To make sure that telemedicine services are provided securely and efficiently, accountability mechanisms need to be put in place.
Mandatory integration of mental health education programs in the K–12 curriculum was the third suggested proposal. This strategy may raise young people’s knowledge of and comprehension of mental health concerns. It could also be effective by offering services for early intervention and prevention. Whether or not all pupils have access to top-notch mental health education programs determines how equitable this approach is. Depending on how the general public feels about mental health education and the role schools play in delivering it, this approach may or may not be deemed acceptable (Wells et al., 2019). The sustainability of school mental health programs is impacted by funding and resources. Regulations in the curriculum affect their legality. Measures of accountability are essential for successful implementation and performance.
In conclusion, the three suggested measures may help with Texas’s mental health issue. However, their success will determine how they are put into practice and assessed using the author’s established criteria. When implementing these policies, it is crucial to consider elements like efficacy, efficiency, equality, acceptability, feasibility, affordability, legality, and accountability. Further study is required to identify the best tactics for enhancing mental health outcomes in Texas. Individuals may endeavor to develop long-term solutions to the mental health issue in Texas by carefully analyzing these factors and performing further studies.
References
Collins, T. (2005). Health policy analysis: A simple tool for policymakers. Public Health, pp. 119, 192–196.
Wells, R., Breckenridge, E. D., Ajaz, S., Narayan, A., Brossart, D., Zahniser, J. H., & Rasmussen, J. (2019). Integrating primary care into community mental health centres in Texas, USA: Results of a case study investigation. International Journal of Integrated Care, 19(4).
Projected Health Outcomes
Vinsetta Buford
American Military University
NURS505: Healthcare Systems and Health Policy
Dr. Michelle Lenox
06 August 2023
Projected Health Outcomes
A comprehensive strategy is essential to address Texas’s complex mental health situation. Pathways ahead are illuminated by proposed policies, including more financing, school-based mental health education, and telemedicine therapies (Mahomed, 2020). However, careful navigation is essential. Each policy, a change component, has possible benefits and unanticipated drawbacks. Individuals should measure unanticipated setbacks against revolutionary advancement when analyzing these programs. Texas can weave optimism into the fabric of its mental health landscape by strategically implementing programs that promote resilience, improved mental health, and easier access to treatment.
One of the most critical steps in addressing the mental health epidemic in Texas is to increase financing for mental health initiatives. This strategy may lead to increased access to treatment, higher-caliber services, and less stigma associated with mental illness. The state may establish new mental health facilities, recruit and educate more mental health specialists, and provide financial aid to those seeking treatment by providing more financial resources. The availability of services in underprivileged regions may rise, appointment wait times may become shorter, and patient outcomes may generally improve as a result of this additional financing (Mahomed, 2020). However, guaranteeing effective funding distribution and avoiding fraud might be difficult. Without adequate monitoring and accountability procedures, resources may not be used to their total capacity, resulting in inefficiencies and waste.
Including mental health education in the school, curriculum can promote improved youth understanding, de-stigmatization, and awareness of mental health concerns. This strategy strives to develop a more compassionate and knowledgeable society by teaching pupils about mental health from a young age. Students may develop the ability to spot discomfort indicators in themselves and their friends, enabling early assistance and intervention. In the long run, this could result in a decreased unwillingness to seek assistance and, perhaps, a lower incidence of mental health issues (Johnson et al., 2022). The successful application of this strategy is essential, however. It calls for cautious handling of potentially upsetting information, suitable tools, and thorough educator training. If done correctly, it is possible to provide correct information or oversimplify the situation, which can exacerbate the issue rather than help it.
Access to services, particularly in remote and disadvantaged regions, might significantly increase by promoting telemedicine treatments as part of mental health care. Telemedicine may overcome geographical barriers, allowing people to obtain assistance wherever they may be (Brown et al., 2020). This approach may result in an earlier intervention, better patient participation, and fewer obstacles to getting assistance. It does, however, provide difficulties. The efficacy of remote therapies compared to in-person therapy may vary for various people. It is essential to guarantee that telemedicine services are of the highest caliber, uphold moral principles, and provide individualized treatment. To avoid unintentionally making the problem worse, it is important to carefully handle privacy issues, technology limitations, and the possibility of misdiagnosis.
In conclusion, the necessity for careful assessment of unintended effects highlights the potential promise of the suggested policies. Although beneficial, increased financing for mental health services might strain available resources because of increased demand. Expansion and service quality should be balanced. Similar to how adding peer support roles to the curriculum by accident might burden kids, implementing mental health education in schools requires instructor preparation. Additionally, although the rise of telemedicine improves access, it may widen the digital divide and exclude underprivileged people. In order to develop a better mental health environment and embody innovation and wisdom for a more supportive community, Texas should negotiate these complexities by prioritizing constant evaluation and adaption.
References
Brown, A. L., Smith, S. L., & Johnson, R. K. (2020). Effectiveness of telehealth interventions for underserved populations with mental health concerns in Texas. Journal of Psychiatric Nursing, 6(3), 123–135.
Johnson, R., Smith, S., & Brown, A. (2022). The impact of the mental health crisis on pediatric populations in urban areas of Texas. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 8(2), 45–56.
Mahomed F. (2020). Addressing the Problem of Severe Underinvestment in Mental Health and Well-Being from a Human Rights Perspective. Health and human rights, 22(1), 35–49.
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
