Blake Glover’s recent job performance needs to be addressed. You hired Blake over a year ago because he was highly qualified for the job, and in his first year, you and other managers were impressed by his excellent work and potential for leadership in the company. However, over the last three months, Blake has been regularly late to work, has called-in sick more than five times, and when he is at work, he has spent most of his time away from his desk, chatting with other employees and otherwise off-task. Upper management agrees that his personality fits well in the company, and you want to keep him; however, his recent behavior cannot be ignored.
As the manager of Blake’s department, you have the task of disciplining him with a formal, written warning, which must include an assessment of Blake’s performance to date and a specific improvement plan. Your plan should include measurable goals for Blake that will allow both Blake and the company to track his improvement within the timeframe you see fit. The warning should also articulate the consequences for Blake if he does not meet these goals.
PLEASR STRICTLY STICK TO THE RUBRICS
Correspondence case rubric
|
Correspondence case rubric
|
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
|
|
25 to >23.0 pts
Superior
Very well organized. Includes a highly personalized buffer for the bad news. Provides a coherent justification for the bad news.
|
23 to >20.0 pts
Strong
Well organized. Includes fairly personalized buffer for the bad news. Provides fairly coherent justification for the bad news.
|
20 to >18.0 pts
Competent
Decently organized. Includes a somewhat impersonal buffer for the bad news. Provides a somewhat coherent justification for the bad news.
|
18 to >15.0 pts
Weak
Poorly organized. Includes an impersonal buffer for the bad news. Provides an incoherent or vague justification for the bad news.
|
15 to >0 pts
Failing
Unorganized. Does not include a buffer for the bad news. Provides no justification for the bad news.
|
|
25 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTone
|
|
25 to >23.0 pts
Superior
The tone is professional. The memo is positive overall and in respect to the supervisor.
|
23 to >20.0 pts
Strong
The tone is mostly professional. The memo is mostly positive overall and somewhat positive in respect to the supervisor.
|
20 to >18.0 pts
Competent
The tone is somewhat professional. The memo is somewhat positive overall, but neutral in respect to the supervisor.
|
18 to >15.0 pts
Weak
The tone is mostly unprofessional. The memo is not neutral overall, and is negative in respect to the supervisor.
|
15 to >0 pts
Failing
The tone is unprofessional. The memo is negative overall and in respect to the supervisor.
|
|
25 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePlan
|
|
15 to >14.0 pts
Superior
The memo offers a feasible, coherent, and creative solution to the problem.
|
14 to >12.0 pts
Strong
The memo offers a mostly feasible, coherent, and somewhat creative solution to the problem.
|
12 to >11.0 pts
Competent
The memo offers a somewhat feasible, coherent, but uncreative solution to the problem.
|
11 to >9.0 pts
Weak
The memo offers an infeasible, incoherent, and uncreative solution to the problem.
|
9 to >0 pts
Failing
The memo does NOT offer any solution to the problem.
|
|
15 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAudience
|
|
15 to >14.0 pts
Superior
The prose guarantees employee compliance.
|
14 to >12.0 pts
Strong
The prose likely guarantees employee compliance.
|
12 to >11.0 pts
Competent
The prose will likely compel some, but not all, employees to comply.
|
11 to >9.0 pts
Weak
The prose guarantees noncompliance from employees.
|
9 to >0 pts
Failing
The prose guarantees noncompliance and infuriation of employees.
|
|
15 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting
|
|
10 to >9.0 pts
Superior
The document is perfectly formatted as a memo.
|
9 to >8.0 pts
Strong
It is well formatted as a memo with few formatting errors.
|
8 to >7.0 pts
Competent
It is decently formatted as a memo with several formatting errors, but still recognizable as a memo.
|
7 to >6.0 pts
Weak
It is poorly formatted as a memo with more than 5 formatting errors and is barely recognizable as a memo.
|
6 to >0 pts
Failing
It is not in memo format.
|
|
10 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics
|
|
10 to >9.0 pts
Superior
The memo includes nearly flawless grammar and punctuation that do not affect the memo's readability.
|
9 to >8.0 pts
Strong
It includes strong grammar and punctuation; includes some minor errors that do not affect readability.
|
8 to >7.0 pts
Competent
It includes acceptable grammar and punctuation; errors mildly affect readability.
|
7 to >6.0 pts
Weak
It includes multiple grammatical and punctuation mistakes that affect readability.
|
6 to >0 pts
Failing
It includes so many grammar and punctuation errors that make the document fail in its goal.
|
|
10 pts
|
|
Total Points: 100
|
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
