To Merge or Not to Merge? Mergers or acquisitions only make sense when the combined entities create greater value together than they can separately. Locate and provide a l
To Merge or Not to Merge…?
Mergers or acquisitions only make sense when the combined entities create greater value together than they can separately.
Locate and provide a link to a recent news story from The Wall Street Journal or other reputable news source about a merger or acquisition that has been announced between two publicly-traded companies in the last year. To avoid repetition, please find an M&A article that other students have not discussed.
- In your own words (not simply copied from the article), describe how the combined entities were expected to create greater value together than separately (e.g., how they were going to increase revenue, lower costs, and/or better manage risks). Be descriptive and thorough in explaining these potential synergies. To support your response, include specific references to M&A strategies discussed in Chapter 6 of The CFO Guidebook.
- Applying your business acumen and emerging CFO skill base, provide your assessment and supporting rationale about whether this merger makes sense from three perspectives:
- Does the merger make sense from a strategic fit perspective?
- Does the valuation of the deal seem reasonable?
- Identify the biggest risk(s) you think the acquirer will confront in extracting the synergies post-transaction.
Post your initial response by Wednesday, midnight of your time zone, and reply to at least 2 of your classmates' initial posts by Sunday, midnight of your time zone.
ist person to response
Deborah Ann Perry RE: Week 4 DiscussionCOLLAPSE
Hello JP and Classmates,
Mergers or acquisitions only make sense when the combined entities create greater value together than they can separately.
Locate and provide a link to a recent news story from The Wall Street Journal or other reputable news sources about a merger or acquisition that has been announced between two publicly-traded companies in the last year. To avoid repetition, please find an M&A article that other students have not discussed.
- In your own words (not simply copied from the article), describe how the combined entities were expected to create greater value together than separately (e.g., how they were going to increase revenue, lower costs, and/or better manage risks). Be descriptive and thorough in explaining these potential synergies. To support your response, include specific references to M&A strategies discussed in Chapter 6 of The CFO Guidebook.
This article is about Food- Delivery Firms Put Mergers, IPOs on the menu.
( wsj.com/articles/food-delivery-firm-put-mergers-on-the-menu-11582030802).
These companies operate in entirely different segments to gain market share to improve operational efficiencies. ( week: 4 Weekly materials).
Grubhub is one of the biggest U.S, public companies that focus on food delivery, lately, their profit has shrunk shares and dropped 39% in the past year. DoorDash, Postmates, and Uber Technologies Inc. In the past month, they have had discussions about merging in various combinations and considering a public listing to raise more money from private investors. Restaurant inc and food delivery need to come together to consolidate. The head chief of Uber talks about he will pull out from the market if his company is not number one or number two in the marketplace. ( wsj.com/articles/food-delivery-firm-put-mergers-on-the-menu-11582030802).
- Applying your business acumen and emerging CFO skill base, provide your assessment and supporting rationale about whether this merger makes sense from three perspectives:
Acquisition Strategies:
Full-service strategy: An acquirer may have a relatively limited line of products or services, and wants to reposition itself to be a full-service provider. This can fill in the holes in the acquirer's full-service strategy. This approach is usually a combination of products with support services and can be extended into multiple geographic regions. ( Steven M. Bragg, CPA).
- Does the merger make sense from a strategic fit perspective?
Food delivery grew rapidly in the U.S. over the past five years, thanks to a flood of venture capital. Companies with food-delivery operations raised nearly $16 billion between 2016 and last year, according to data firm PitchBook.
Delivery companies used the cash to expand across the U.S. and invade each other’s strongholds. DoorDash, Uber Eats, Postmates, and Grubhub all say that they can deliver to about three-quarters of the U.S. population. (https://www.wsj.com/articles/food-delivery-firms-put-mergers-ipos-on-the-menu-11582030802).
- Does the valuation of the deal seem reasonable?
This month the company started laying off its employee drivers, issuing more than 3,000 notices to workers in Louisiana, Texas, and Alabama, according to state labor department records.
A Waitr spokesman said the company is converting its employee drivers to contractual workers. Yes, this deal seem reasonable
- Identify the biggest risk(s) you think the acquirer will confront in extracting the synergies post-transaction.
Uber's IPO filing dishes on frenemies, synergies, and #DeleteUber.
This could hit a valuation as high as $91 billion.
Uber's price range of $44 to $ 50 a share. A private company, Uber raised $ 14.9 billion, giving it an estimated valuation of $ 76 billion.
Deborah
Ref:
Steven M. Bragg, CPA. The CFO Guidebook. Chapter 6.
(https://www.wsj.com/articles/food-delivery-firms-put-mergers-ipos-on-the-menu-11582030802.
https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/ubers-s-1-ipo-filing-dishes-on-frenemies-synergies-and-deleteuber/.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/food-delivery-firms-put-mergers-ipos-on-the-menu-11582030802.
2nd person to respond to
1 day agoJamie Valinsky Cisco Agrees to New Deal to Buy Acacia for $115 a ShareCOLLAPSE
Good Afternoon Professor and Classmates,
Article: Cisco Agrees to New Deal to Buy Acacia for $115 a Share
Author: Sarah E. Needleman
Date: January 14, 2021
For a little bit of context before we get into the article, one of Cisco's largest segments for revenue generation comes from a market called Service Providers (SP's). We've all heard of them, Verizon, T-Mobile, AT&T, Bell Canada, Rogers, Telus, Deutsche Telecom, British Telecom…. you get the point. These SP's invest billions of dollars in infrastructure to deliver services such as the Internet, MPLS, Cellular, First Responder, and the like to consumers and enterprises across the world. The majority of that infrastructure in today's technology world is built using a technology known as Fiber Optics, you may even have such a connection in your home.
The purpose of this acquisition was for Cisco to absorb a company, Acacia, that specifically designs and manufactures fiber optic components that are essential for the operation of Large Cisco Routers and their corresponding Line Cards. These Small Form Pluggable (SFP's) as they are known, are mandatory for terminating fiber on either end of the connection, and thus SP's around the world consume hundreds of thousands of them per year. As the article states, "The two companies share a vision for the future of routing and pluggable optics, which are more cost-efficient than traditional chassis-based systems… together we will ignite our strategy to transform the optical world as we know it" (Needleman, 1). This represents a Market Window Strategy, Sales Growth Strategy, and Synergy Strategy all in the same acquisition.
A Market Window Strategy represents an opportunity for an acquirer to purchase "another company that is already positioned to take advantage of the window with the correct products, distribution channels, facilities" (Bragg, 2). By purchasing a company such as Acacia, Cisco is well positioned to take advantage of this market segment by coupling these optics with its large service provider chassis sales including the ability to add on Umbrella subscriptions and services that generate healthy renewals revenue – this is the Sales Growth Strategy coming into effect. Lastly, the Synergy Strategy aka the "bolt-on strategy" (2). By combining forces, Cisco and Acacia can not only streamline R&D and Engineering between these two companies, but it can also seek to operate at a larger economy of scale and strip inefficiencies out of the business. From a strategic point of view, this is a win for Cisco and Acacia on many levels!
The acquisition price of $4.5bil USD was based on fiscal year 2020 revenues of $583.5mil USD and non-GAAP income of $127.4mil USD, which represents a multiplier of just over 7.5 times on revenue (Acacia, 3). This is a profitable, functioning technology company that can transform Cisco's presence in the Optical Pluggable space and provide much-needed boosts into next-generation networks such as 5G. Upside aside, this represents a fair valuation at a fair multiplier in the Networking Infrastructure world for a company whose main focus is hardware.
From a risk perspective, the largest risk I can identify is a failure to properly integrate and build out a platform offering that aligns with customers on both strategic functionality and price – "reporting a larger amount of total revenue does not generate value, it may destroy value" (2). While Acacia on its own was successful in generating over $500mil USD in revenue without the additional coverage of its Cisco sales counterparts nor its cisco R&D/Engineering Counterparts, it is imperative from an integration standpoint the strategy needs to be well aligned, and well executed, else this acquisition may end up convoluting an offering as opposed to strengthening it.
Best,
Jamie Valinsky
References:
1. Sarah E. Needleman. January 14, 2021. Cisco Agrees to New Deal to Buy Acacia for $115 a Share. Wallstreet Journal. Retrieved from: https://www.wsj.com/articles/cisco-agrees-to-new-deal-to-buy-acacia-for-115-a-share-11610636090
2. Steven M. Bragg, CPA. 2020. The CFO Guidebook, Chapter 6. Accounting Tools.
3. Acacia Communications, Inc. January 11, 2021. Acacia Communications Announces Preliminary Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2020 Results.
© Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.
JWI 531 (1202) Page 1 of 8
JWI 531: Financial Management II
Week Four Lecture Notes
© Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.
JWI 531 (1202) Page 2 of 8
MERGERS, ACQUISITIONS, AND VALUATION
What It Means
In a competitive and multifaceted market, there is a multitude of opportunities for companies to join forces
in order to leverage synergies. This can include competitors coming together to expand into new markets.
It can come from a company acquiring one of its suppliers or distributors in order to have greater control
over the supply chain. It can come from improving operating efficiencies by reducing redundant costs.
While all these can generate important strategic wins, the central question from the financial perspective
is whether the combined organization is more valuable together than apart.
Why It Matters
Competitive dynamics are constantly changing, and even if your organization is not considering a
merger or acquisition, one of your competitors might be. And if they pull it off, they may very well
take market share from you.
Investors need to understand how the risks and opportunities of a merger or acquisition would
impact the valuation of the companies.
Given the frequent cultural and operational challenges that come with a merger or acquisition,
finance leaders need to help strategy leaders – including the CFO and Board – quantify the
upside and downside potential in order to assess whether it makes sense to go forward.
“Successful mergers create a dynamic
where 1+1=3, catapulting the company’s
competitiveness literally overnight.
You just have to do it right.”
Jack Welch
© Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.
JWI 531 (1202) Page 3 of 8
THE CHALLENGE AND OPPORTUNITY FOR MANAGERS
Depending on your industry, mergers and acquisitions may be relatively common occurrences, or they
may be quite rare. Either way, if you want to be a more effective financial leader or make better
investment decisions, you have to understand both why they occur and the advantages and challenges
they can bring.
The challenges in a merger or acquisition are myriad. These include, but are not limited to, the following:
Identifying the opportunities and potential for a merger or acquisition
Approaching the acquisition target to feel them out
Navigating regulations and antitrust laws that place restrictions on the merger
Valuating the acquisition or merger
Crafting terms for the merger that will be attractive for the acquired company without
overspending
Fending off your competitors who, if they get wind of the merger, may decide to sweep in with a
better offer
Satisfying your lenders and shareholders who need to approve the acquisition
As if all this weren’t enough, the two companies, once the ink is dry, have to actually make the merger
work. This integration can take years. It will involve merging operating systems and HR functions, making
tough decisions about reductions in workforce, and deciding who gets promoted to bigger roles. There
are also the conflicts that can come from cultural differences and bad blood when former competitors
decide to join forces. And in the end, the merger has to make financial sense for the long term.
In light of all this, it’s tempting to just give up on mergers and acquisitions. But when done properly, they
can be a powerful way to grow the business and fend off competition. They can open doors to new
markets, improve operating efficiency by reducing redundant functions, and better leverage core
strengths and best practices from each organization.
Senior financial leaders are critical players in the merger process. In fact, no merger strategy is distinct
from a finance strategy. The two are inseparable. As you engage with the course materials and activities
this week, stay focused on the core theme of our course – the role of finance as a strategic tool. A
successful merger or acquisition is only possible when it is supported by careful financial analysis and
planning that is focused on increasing revenues, managing expenses, and reducing risk.
© Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.
JWI 531 (1202) Page 4 of 8
YOUR STARTING POINT
1. If someone asked you what a merger with one of your competitors, suppliers, or customers
could do for your business, what would you say? Could you explain the financial benefits and
risks?
2. What would happen if that same question was applied to one of your competitors? Which
companies, if they were to merge, would create the biggest disruption in the playing field?
3. As an investor interested in your company, how would a merger with your fiercest competitor
impact the valuation of the newly combined company?
4. If you are a financial leader in a merged organization, what impact would the merger process
have on your day-to-day business?
5. Can you think of examples of companies that have merged where the results were positive,
and where they were not? In terms of the latter, what went wrong?
6. How can you keep your eyes open for new merger or acquisition opportunities?
© Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.
JWI 531 (1202) Page 5 of 8
MAKING MERGERS WORK
The Building Blocks of an Acquisition
“Mergers mean change. But change isn’t bad. And mergers, in general, are very good.
They are not only a necessary part of business, they have the potential to deliver
profitable growth and put you in a new and exciting strategic position at a speed that
organic growth just cannot match. Yes, mergers and acquisitions have their challenges,
and all kinds of research will tell you that more than half don’t add value. But nothing says
you have to fall victim to that statistic.”
Winning, pp. 242-43
Our course materials this week address several topics in finance strategy related to mergers and
acquisitions. When done properly, a merger or acquisition offers a pathway to growth that outpaces what
can be achieved by organic growth alone. Of course, the key word here is properly. To break down what
a proper acquisition must include, our core text and supporting materials explore the following:
Strategy – the reasons companies pursue acquisitions or mergers
Due Diligence – the investigation of the target company prior to signing the agreements
Valuation – determining what the business being acquired is worth
Payment – options for how an acquisition can be funded
Legal Structure – ways to maximize tax benefits and limit liabilities
Integration – making the acquisition work
Why Should We Do This?
“[M]ergers and acquisitions give you a faster way to profitable growth. They quickly add
geographical and technological scope, and bring on board new products and customers.
Just as important, mergers instantly allow a company to improve its players – suddenly
there are twice as many people ‘trying out’ for the team.”
Winning, p. 219
In chapter 6 of The CFO Guidebook, Bragg presents an overview of the most common reasons why
companies merge. We will not attempt to replicate that summary, but below is a brief preview to set the
stage for your reading:
Diversification to move away from the core business
Full service to increase the number of products and services
Geographic growth into new regions
Market window strategy to take advantage of a new opportunity
Product supplementation strategy to sell bundled offerings
Roll-up strategy to acquire smaller businesses and merge them into a consolidated business
Sales growth strategy to leverage new channels
Synergy strategy to reduce costs
Vertical integration strategy to have greater control over the supply chain
© Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.
JWI 531 (1202) Page 6 of 8
Whatever the drivers for the acquisition are, the critical point is that the acquisition strategies should be
active, not passive. Rather than waiting for an opportunity to surface and then evaluating it, companies
should determine what they need to do to grow, and then actively seek out potential candidates that meet
their strategic requirements.
Due Diligence
Doing your homework well in advance of the closing date for an acquisition is critical. Failure to dig deeply
enough can open the door for unpleasant surprises that can have serious financial consequences. This
investigation should include questions about why the company is interested in being acquired, what the
culture is like, how the management team and compensation plans are structured, etc. And, of course, it
goes without saying that financials must be thoroughly examined. If something doesn’t look right, you
must push and probe until you get the answers you need. Never be afraid to walk away from a deal if the
due diligence process turns up something that just doesn’t feel right. As Jack often says, you have to trust
your gut. Bragg presents a helpful checklist for this (pp. 104-110), followed by a summary of the
indicators of a strong acquisition candidate. Make sure you take time to carefully review these, especially
if your own company is considering an acquisition or merger.
How Much Should You Pay?
Overpayment for an acquisition is a huge risk, especially when companies feel they are locked in a life-
and-death battle for market share. In fact, Jack identifies this danger as one of his Seven Pitfalls of
Mergers and Acquisitions. “The sixth pitfall is paying too much. Not 5 or 10 percent too much, but so much
that the premium can never be recouped in the integration” (Winning, p. 237). In our course materials, you
will review various methodologies that CFOs and analysts use to value an acquisition, including:
Liquidation value
Enterprise value
Multiples analysis
Discounted cash flows
Replication value
Comparison analysis
Strategic purchase
Still, as a veteran of well over one thousand acquisitions during his tenure at GE, Jack reminds us:
“There is no real trick to avoiding overpayment, no calculation you can use as a rule of
thumb to know when a sum is too much. Just know that, except in very rare cases of
industry consolidation, if you miss a merger on price, life goes on. There will be another
deal. There is no last best deal – there’s just deal heat that makes it feel that way.”
Winning, pp. 238-39
Of course, identifying and valuing the acquisition is just the beginning. Bragg devotes the second half of
the chapter to options for funding and managing the integration – a must read for financial leaders!
© Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.
JWI 531 (1202) Page 7 of 8
SUCCEEDING BEYOND THE COURSE
As you read the materials and participate in class activities, stay focused on the key learning outcomes
for the week and how they can be applied to your job.
Examine the potential benefits of mergers and acquisitions
Consider the opportunities that exist in your own business and market. Never assume that even if
you’re not at the top of the ladder, you can’t uncover great opportunities for a merger or
acquisition. Think about the suppliers you deal with. Is there anything you hear from their reps
that could be a hint they are open to being acquired? What about your customers? If you are in a
B2B business, there may be benefits from a closer integration with a wholesaler or distributor for
one of your products. And, of course, don’t forget about your competitors. Don’t let rivalries blind
you to the potential benefits of joining forces. It’s better to consider this before you pick up the
paper and read that two of them have just announced a merger or acquisition that radically
disrupts the playing field and could put you out of business. If you have an idea, flesh it out. Bring
it to your boss. You never know where there may be opportunities.
Explore methodologies to value an acquisition target
Accurately assessing the valuation of acquisitions and mergers can be especially difficult. Even
the most seasoned financial experts get it wrong all the time. Why? The answers run the gamut
from “circumstances have changed” to “the integration didn’t go as planned.” Still, every
acquisition or merger has to be assigned a value. Review the text section in chapter 6 of The
CFO Guidebook on valuation methodologies. Do some real-world research by looking at
companies who have merged over the last few years. How has their stock price changed? Have
they grown more than they would have on their own? How could you validate that? What are
their CEOs saying publicly about the success of the merger? Do the analysts agree? Why or why
not?
Assess the advantages and disadvantages of different ways to fund an acquisition
As you look at real-world examples, pay attention to how the acquiring company paid for the
acquisition. Paying cash or borrowing is often a sign that the acquiring company is in a strong
financial position with plenty of cash in reserves. It also suggests the company is confident that
its own stock price will rise significantly above current prices, and thus, they want to hang on to
as much of it as they can. However, equity ownership is one of the greatest drivers of employee
performance. Paying for an acquisition with stock gives stakeholders in the acquired company
(which now own shares of the parent company) a strong motivation to make the merger work. If
you have identified a potential merger or acquisition target for your own company, how would
you fund it, and why?
© Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University Confidential and Proprietary information and may not be copied, further distributed, or otherwise disclosed in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University.
JWI 531 (1202) Page 8 of 8
ACTION PLAN
To apply what I have learned this week in my course to my job, I will…
Action Item(s)
Resources and Tools Needed (from this course and in my workplace)
Timeline and Milestones
Success Metrics
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.