Read two articles and write the answer to the questions below (around 700 words in 24 hours): 1) Establishes the importance of th
Read two articles and write the answer to the questions below (around 700 words in 24 hours):
1) Establishes the importance of the research problem (e.g., it costs us money, impacts society, influences health/well-being) – based on the rationale
2) Discusses what researchers already know about the topic and which areas need more investigation – likely from the introduction/literature review section of the study
Rationale:
Many people have pointed out that academic research tends to stay stuck within academic journal articles where it may be read by a small set of academics. It is rate than an article is translated into something that can be understood and used by the general public. There is a need to communicate about this work in a user-friendly way so that it can have greater reach.
Communication and marketing researchers that use the scientific method to better understand their field have the same problems, and some of the academic organizations in the discipline have offices to help translate research for the general public. The National Communication Association (NCA) publishes many communication research journals and holds many academic conferences in the field, and they have Communication Currents as an outlet for this work of translating the work of its members to the outside world. Communication Currents is a written interpretation of a research article that is meant to be brief, only recapping the highlights of a longer published study. You’re asked to achieve a similar goal with this presentation.
Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ujoa20
Journal of Advertising
ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ujoa20
Navigating the Future of Influencer Advertising: Consolidating What Is Known and Identifying New Research Directions
Sara Rosengren & Colin Campbell
To cite this article: Sara Rosengren & Colin Campbell (2021) Navigating the Future of Influencer Advertising: Consolidating What Is Known and Identifying New Research Directions, Journal of Advertising, 50:5, 505-509, DOI: 10.1080/00913367.2021.1984346
To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2021.1984346
Published online: 09 Nov 2021.
Submit your article to this journal
Article views: 4008
View related articles
View Crossmark data
INTRODUCTION
Navigating the Future of Influencer Advertising: Consolidating What Is Known and Identifying New Research Directions
Sara Rosengrena and Colin Campbellb
aStockholm School of Economics, Stockholm, Sweden; bUniversity of San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
Social media influencers (hereafter referred to as influ- encers) have come to be central actors in an increas- ingly interconnected digital and social advertising system. In the following introduction, we briefly out- line where the academic understanding of influencers currently stands, how the articles included in this issue section add to this knowledge, and where we believe opportunities for further contributions exist.
Table 1 summarizes this discussion by sorting it into four key interconnected parts of the influencer advertising ecosystem: advertisers, influencers, con- sumers, and content. Due to the brevity of this editor- ial, we include only a limited number of citations and direct readers to excellent recent literature reviews (e.g., Hudders et al. 2021; Ye et al. 2021) for richer discussions of the literature.
What Is Known about Influencer Advertising?
Influencer advertising (also referred to as influencer marketing) has shown tremendous growth in the past decade. There is no question that the influencer industry is large, here to stay, and continuing to grow (Campbell and Farrell 2020). The existing academic literature has given us the following insights.
Influencers Are an Effective—and Major— Advertising Form
Both academic research and results from industry make it clear that influencers can be an effective form of advertising. In fact, research shows that content by influencers can be as effective as or more effective than advertising by either brands or celebrities. In addition, influencer persuasiveness is not limited to
humans; artificial intelligence influencers can also be effective.
Insights on Endorsements Generally Apply to Influencers
Much of the endorsement literature applies to influ- encers. Consumers follow influencers for various rea- sons, including aspiration, envy, entertainment, and intrigue. Perceptions of attractiveness, authenticity, credibility, and trustworthiness increase influencer persuasiveness. So too does a strong fit between an influencer and what is endorsed.
Consumer–Influencer Connection Drives Effectiveness
Still, influencers represent a unique blend of paid endorsement being injected into what otherwise might be construed as word of mouth, a blend which seems to drive their success. Research shows that consumers’ sense of personal connection with (known as paraso- cial relationship) and similarity to an influencer enhances influencer effectiveness. So does increased interaction and engagement between an influencer and the consumers that follow them.
Disclosures on Influencer Content Work As Expected . . .
Eisend et al.’s (2020) meta-analysis of the numerous studies on this topic confirms that a disclosure on influencer content generally makes consumers more aware that an influencer is paid, increases persuasion knowledge activation, and reduces persuasion. Likewise, clearer and more overt disclosures are more
CONTACT Colin Campbell [email protected] Department of Marketing, School of Business, University of San Diego, 5998 Alcal�a Park, San Diego, CA 92110, USA.
Sara Rosengren (PhD, Stockholm School of Economics) is a professor, Center for Retailing, Stockholm School of Economics. Colin Campbell (PhD, Simon Fraser University) is an assistant professor, Department of Marketing, School of Business, University of San Diego.
Copyright � 2021, American Academy of Advertising
JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING 2021, VOL. 50, NO. 5, 505–509 https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2021.1984346
Table 1. The past, present, and future of influencer advertising. Perspective What Is Known What This Special Section Adds What Remains to Be Discovered
Advertiser � Influencers are generally effective advertisers.
� Consumers react better to the same content from influencers than from brands (Lou et al. 2019).
� Consumers react better to influencers than to celebrities (Schouten et al. 2020).
� Artificial intelligence influencers can be as effective as humans.
� Influencers can produce a variety of different content types as part of a campaign (Scholz 2021).
� Advertisers can collaborate with influencers in a multitude of different ways (Rundin and Colliander 2021).
� Micro-influencers are more effective at advertising hedonic products than utilitarian products (Park et al. 2021).
� Influencers are effective at advertising social causes (Yang et al. 2021).
� How can influencer campaigns be effectively integrated with other types of advertising?
� How can advertisers predict which influencers are best for their campaigns?
� What factors moderate the effectiveness of influencer advertising?
� How can fraudulent or fake influencers be identified?
� Which community-centric key performance indicators best capture influencer performance?
� What communication objectives (e.g., awareness, purchase) are influencers most suited to achieve? What mechanisms can influence this?
Influencer � Influencers are dependent on consumers following them.
� Influencer–product fit increases persuasiveness.
� Attractiveness, credibility, authenticity, and trustworthiness boost influencer persuasiveness.
� Perceived motives affect persuasiveness and can be shaped by influencers.
� Influencer interactivity boosts authenticity and attachment, increasing persuasiveness.
� Being active across platforms is necessary for influencers to become successful (Brooks et al. 2021).
� Influencers’ success likely depends on the roles they take when collaborating with brands (Rundin and Colliander 2021).
� Micro-influence success is driven by the perceived authenticity of the influencer (Park et al. 2021).
� How can influencers choose the right brands with which to work? And the right number and mix of them?
� How do influencers maintain celebrity capital (i.e., later stages of celebrification or the celebrity life cycle)?
� How might growing from a micro- to macro- influencer affect how an influencer operates?
� What influencer roles create the most value for consumers and advertisers?
� How do long-term commitments and/or number of collaborations affect influencer persuasiveness?
� How does wear-out impact influencers? Consumer � Consumers self-select which
influencers they follow, typically motivated by authenticity, consumerism, creative inspiration, and envy (Lee et al. 2021).
� Consumers respond more positively to influencers who are similar to them or who they aspire to be like.
� Activation of persuasion knowledge often has minimal impact on consumer response to influencers, and disclosure can lead to positive effects (Lou 2021); these effects can be enhanced by justification.
� Consumers’ parasocial relationships with influencers mute the negative effect of persuasion knowledge.
� A strong parasocial relationship makes a consumer open to being advertised a wider array of products.
� Consumers and influencers can be similar along multiple different dimensions, suggesting that identification in an influencer context is complex (Scholz 2021).
� Consumers derive value from influencer content in six different ways (Scholz 2021).
� How are influencers consumed in nonbeauty and nonfashion contexts?
� When do consumers view an influencer as a consumer? A celebrity? An entrepreneur? A brand? And how does this affect consumer response to the influencer?
� How is an influencer’s success affected by their choice of social media (e.g., YouTube versus Instagram) and/or by specific content types (e.g., Instagram feed versus story versus IGTV)?
� How is response to an influencer affected by the type of similarity a consumer shares with an influencer?
Content � Informativeness and entertainment make influencer content more appealing.
� Content that is more narrative and higher in social presence/affective can mute persuasion knowledge activation (Lou 2021).
� Hard-sell appeals are more effective than soft-sell appeals.
� Disclosures are generally effective in making consumers aware influencers are advertising (see Eisend et al.’s 2020 meta-analysis).
� More transparent disclosures receive better reactions.
� More overt disclosures are more effective.
� Micro-influencer content should focus on hedonic rather than utilitarian appeals (Park et al 2021).
� Content can be adapted to the six different ways in which consumers derive value from influencers (Scholz 2021).
� Content needs to be adapted to enable effective use across platforms (Brooks et al. 2021).
� To what extent does the quality (e.g., aesthetics or creativity) of influencer content affect consumer response?
� How is the trade-off between authenticity and professionalism navigated by influencers and reacted to by consumers?
� How are advertising appeals adapted to an influencer environment? Do other new or hybrid appeals exist (e.g., proactive disclosure; Lou 2021)?
506 S. ROSENGREN AND C. CAMPBELL
effective in triggering these effects than disclosures that are less transparent.
. . . Yet Consumer–Influencer Connection Mutes the Effectiveness of Disclosures
Still, perceiving a strong relationship or connection with an influencer is shown to make consumers less concerned about an influencer’s commercial interests. In fact, influencers who share that they are paid but provide justification for accepting payment can be seen more positively (e.g., Lou 2021). Using narra- tives, being more affective, and having a stronger social presence all decrease persuasion knowledge acti- vation. Consumers also respond to influencers based on their inferred motives, but those motives can be shaped by the influencers themselves.
What Insights Does This Special Section Add?
This special section set out to develop knowledge of how advertisers can derive benefit from influencers. Answering calls for a more diverse and contemporary development of advertising theory (Dahlen and Rosengren 2016), it sought contributions that add novel understanding of the mechanisms through which influencer advertising works and how adver- tisers can best leverage influencers. The five articles included add the following to the literature.
Advertisers Collaborate with Influencers in Multiple Different Ways
Rundin and Colliander (2021) show that influencers take on a variety of different roles in their collabora- tions with advertisers and brands, many of which are much deeper relationships than mere endorsement. Their article provides both a “menu” of roles for advertisers to consider when hiring influencers as well as a typology for researchers to use when analyzing influencer campaigns.
Influencers Create More Than Sales
Yang et al.’s (2021) investigation into content related to the Black Lives Matter movement shows that influ- encers are more likely than brands to facilitate posi- tive engagement around a cause, especially when the fit between influencer and cause is high. It also high- lights how influencers can mitigate consumer skepti- cism around cause-related messaging. This suggests that advertisers should not restrict their influencer
collaborations to efforts focused on sales and that researchers should extend their investigations to examine non-sales-related outcomes.
Influencers Act Differently Than Celebrities Because Their Status Is Acquired Differently
Brooks et al. (2021) outline a distinct process by which influencers acquire celebrity capital within an interconnected social media advertising system. The need for influencers to maintain celebrity capital puts power in the hands of their consumer following and advertisers. This dependency makes influencers natur- ally prone to advertise more collaboratively than trad- itional celebrities. It also complements Rundin and Colliander’s (2021) finding that influencers often act as much more than mere endorsers.
Consumers Consume Influencer Content in Several Different Ways
Scholz (2021) identifies six ways in which influencer advertising is consumed. His insights provide influ- encers and advertisers with a useful tool for develop- ing and assessing campaigns (e.g., “Are our ads addressing all six consumption modes?”). For researchers, Scholz’s findings also highlight that con- sumer–influencer similarity operates in a more nuanced manner than traditionally thought.
Influencers Advertise “with” Consumers, Not “to” Consumers
Scholz’s (2021) article also highlights that influencer effectiveness is based on more than source effects. Both Scholz’s article and Brooks et al.’s (2021) article show that influencer persuasion depends on intrinsic linkages between influencers and their audiences, as well as the content being produced and the products and/or brands advertised in that content. Understanding of ads created by influencers is thus highly contextual.
Micro-Influencer Effectiveness Is Driven by Authenticity
Park et al. (2021) show that increased authenticity is what makes endorsements from micro-influencers more effective than those of mega-influencers. Their article also shows that this effect occurs only for micro-influencers when their advertising involves hedonic—and not utilitarian—products and appeals.
JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING 507
Where to Next?
We call for research to continue to explore the role influencers have in our increasingly interconnected digital and social advertising system, characterized by the continuous flow of new formats, new consumer behaviors, and new effects (Dahlen and Rosengren 2016). In addition to future research needs identified in each article, Table 1 summarizes specific areas we believe are worth exploring. However, we also see three broader themes evident across future research efforts.
Influencer Advertising Deserves Influencer- Specific Theorizing
A common theme across the Scholz (2021), Brooks et al. (2021), and Rundin and Colliander (2021) articles is that using traditional advertising theories to under- stand influencer marketing runs the risk of missing what is unique about the phenomenon. This point is also made by Lou (2021). The relationships between advertisers, influencers, consumers, and content are more dynamic and synergetic than that of placing an ad in a specific medium or hiring a celebrity to promote a product. This special issue highlights the need to refresh and reground our understanding of influencers in the influencer phenomenon rather than solely draw on theo- rizing from celebrity endorsement and source effects. For example, rather than studying how different disclo- sures (which are already required in most countries) may or may not affect persuasion, we might consider how audience interactivity impacts persuasion.
The Complexity of Influencer Advertising Necessitates Different Research Designs
Given the dynamic and synergetic nature of the influen- cer advertising ecosystem, we need to design empirical studies that account for the interrelationships between advertisers, influencers, consumers, and content. A sin- gle exposure to an ad from an unknown influencer is unlikely to replicate the effect of seeing an ad from an influencer a consumer has followed and trusted for years. Capturing such nuance and context will likely require industry collaborations, longitudinal data, and/or field experiments involving actual influencers, as well a range of different methods.
Influencer Advertising Must Explore Issues of Importance to Advertisers
Our review of the literature and reading of all the con- tributions to the special issue highlights a lack of
research examining how advertisers can best work with influencers and how influencers can be integrated into other advertising efforts. Further research that goes beyond studying the effects of influencers as mere spokespersons (Rundin and Colliander 2021) or investi- gates the effect of cross-platform appeals (Brooks et al 2021) is needed. Research that looks beyond the hedonic contexts of beauty and fashion (Park et al. 2021) or examines cause-related appeals (Yang et al. 2021) would also be valuable. Uncertainty also exists related to select- ing and evaluating influencers, detecting fraud in the industry, and choosing success metrics.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to everyone who contributed to make this special issue possible. We thank Shelly Rodgers, editor in chief, for trusting us to edit this issue and offering invalu- able guidance and support throughout the process. We thank all the authors who submitted more papers than we could have ever expected—68 in total!—which necessitated tough decisions to fill the issue’s five slots. Finally, we deeply thank the reviewers who shared their expertise.
ORCID
Sara Rosengren http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4358-8919 Colin Campbell http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6218-0866
References
Brooks, Gillian, Jenna Drenten, and Mikolaj Piskorski. 2021. “Influencer Celebrification: How Social Media Influencers Acquire Celebrity Capital.” Journal of Advertising 50 (5): 546–65.
Campbell, Colin, and Justine Rapp Farrell. 2020. “More than What Meets the Eye: Conceptualizing the Functional Components Underlying Influencer Marketing.” Business Horizons 63 (4):469–79. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2020.03.003
Dahlen, Micael, and Sara Rosengren. 2016. “If Advertising Won’t Die, What Will It Be? Toward a Working Definition of Advertising.” Journal of Advertising 45 (3): 334–45. doi:10.1080/00913367.2016.1172387
Eisend, Martin, Eva A. van Reijmersdal, Sophie C. Boerman, and Farid Tarrahi. 2020. “A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Disclosing Sponsored Content.” Journal of Advertising 49 (3):344–66. doi:10.1080/00913367.2020.1765909
Hudders, Liselot, Steffi De Jans, and Marijke De Veirman. 2021. “The Commercialization of Social Media Stars: A Literature Review and Conceptual Framework on the Strategic Use of Social Media Influencers.” International Journal of Advertising 40 (3):327–75. doi:10.1080/ 02650487.2020.1836925
Lee, J. A., Sudarshan, S., Sussman, K. L., Bright, L. F., and Eastin, M. S. 2021. “Why are Consumers Following Social Media Influencers on Instagram? Exploration of Consumers’ Motives for Following Influencers and the Role of Materialism.” International Journal of
508 S. ROSENGREN AND C. CAMPBELL
Advertising. Advance Online Publication. doi:10.1080/ 02650487.2021.1964226
Lou, Chen. 2021. “Social Media Influencers and Followers: Theorization of a Trans-Parasocial Relation and Explication of Its Implications for Influencer Advertising.” Journal of Advertising:1–18. doi:10.1080/00913367.2021.1880345
Lou, C., Tan, S. S., and Chen, X. 2019. “Investigating con- sumer engagement with influencer-vs. brand-promoted ads: The roles of source and disclosure.” Journal of Interactive Advertising 19 (3): 169–186.
Park, Jiwoon, Ji Min Lee, Vikki Yiqi Xiong, Felix Septianto, and Yuri Seo. 2021. “David and Goliath: When and Why Micro-Influencers Are More Persuasive than Mega- Influencers.” Journal of Advertising 50 (5):584–602.
Rundin, Ksenia, and Jonas Colliander. 2021. “Multi-Faceted Influencers: Towards a New Typology for Influencer Roles in Advertising.” Journal of Advertising 50 (5): 510–26.
Scholz, Joachim. 2021. “How Consumers Consume Social Media Influence.” Journal of Advertising 50 (5):566–83.
Schouten, A. P., Janssen, L., and Verspaget, M. 2020. “Celebrity vs. Influencer Endorsements in Advertising: The Role of Identification, Credibility, and Product- Endorser Fit.” International Journal of Advertising 39 (2): 258–281.
Yang, Jeongwon, Ploypin Chuenterawong, and Krittaphat Pugdeethosapol. 2021. “Speaking up on Black Lives Matter: A Comparative Study of Consumer Reactions towards Brand and Influencer-Generated Corporate Social Responsibility Messages.” Journal of Advertising 50 (5):527–45.
Ye, Guoquan, Liselot Hudders, Steffi De Jans, and Marijke De Veirman. 2021. “The Value of Influencer Marketing for Business: A Bibliometric Analysis and Managerial Implications.” Journal of Advertising 50 (2):160–78. doi: 10.1080/00913367.2020.1857888
JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING 509
- Outline placeholder
- What Is Known about Influencer Advertising?
- Influencers Are an Effective—and Major—Advertising Form
- Insights on Endorsements Generally Apply to Influencers
- Consumer–Influencer Connection Drives Effectiveness
- Disclosures on Influencer Content Work As Expected . . .
- . . . Yet Consumer–Influencer Connection Mutes the Effectiveness of Disclosures
- What Insights Does This Special Section Add?
- Advertisers Collaborate with Influencers in Multiple Different Ways
- Influencers Create More Than Sales
- Influencers Act Differently Than Celebrities Because Their Status Is Acquired Differently
- Consumers Consume Influencer Content in Several Different Ways
- Influencers Advertise “with” Consumers, Not “to” Consumers
- Micro-Influencer Effectiveness Is Driven by Authenticity
- Where to Next?
- Influencer Advertising Deserves Influencer-Specific Theorizing
- The Complexity of Influencer Advertising Necessitates Different Research Designs
- Influencer Advertising Must Explore Issues of Importance to Advertisers
- Acknowledgments
- Orcid
- References
,
Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ujoa20
Journal of Advertising
ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ujoa20
The Value of Influencer Marketing for Business: A Bibliometric Analysis and Managerial Implications
Guoquan Ye, Liselot Hudders, Steffi De Jans & Marijke De Veirman
To cite this article: Guoquan Ye, Liselot Hudders, Steffi De Jans & Marijke De Veirman (2021) The Value of Influencer Marketing for Business: A Bibliometric Analysis and Managerial Implications, Journal of Advertising, 50:2, 160-178, DOI: 10.1080/00913367.2020.1857888
To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2020.1857888
View supplementary material
Published online: 26 Jan 2021.
Submit your article to this journal
Article views: 7896
View related articles
View Crossmark data
Citing articles: 8 View citing articles
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.