SPSS Tests of Significance Discussion: Chi-Square Example With Hypotheses and Interpretation (GSS 2018)
Need help with this assignment?Get an original answer from a qualified tutor — from $10/page.
Get it written →SPSS Discussion: Tests of Significance on Project Variables (GSS 2018)
In Week 3 you used crosstabs to see whether a relationship between two variables was worth examining; in Week 4 you studied tests of significance. Now apply a test of significance to your project variables, chosen by level of measurement:
- Briefly explain your topic and research question, then begin the five steps of hypothesis testing by stating the research and null hypotheses. State that alpha is .05.
- Run the appropriate test (chi-square for two categorical variables; regression for two interval/ratio variables; independent-samples t test when a two-group categorical IV predicts an interval/ratio DV; ANOVA for three or more groups) and paste the table.
- Identify the two-tailed p value and explain your findings. Is p < alpha? Do you reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis? Does your IV affect your DV?
Tests of significance tell us whether a relationship observed in the GSS 2018 sample is likely to generalize to the population of U.S. adults.
H1 and H0, alpha = .05
Both categorical = chi-square
Pearson chi-square, df, Asymp. Sig.
p < .05: reject H0
Important: the numbers below are illustrative only, made up to show how to set up and interpret the test. They are not actual GSS 2018 results. Run the test on your own project variables in SPSS and paste your own output.
Model response
Original example for study purposes (about 380 words). All counts and statistics are illustrative, not real GSS output.
Topic and research question. My project examines gender differences in perceived neighborhood safety among U.S. adults. Research question: Is respondent’s sex related to fear of walking alone at night in the neighborhood? The independent variable is SEX (male, female; nominal), and the dependent variable is FEAR (“Is there any area right around here, that is, within a mile, where you would be afraid to walk alone at night?” yes, no; nominal).
Step 1: Hypotheses and alpha.
- Research hypothesis (H1): There is a relationship between sex and fear of walking alone at night; women are more likely than men to report fear.
- Null hypothesis (H0): There is no relationship between sex and fear of walking alone at night.
- Alpha level: .05.
Step 2: Test of significance. Because both variables are categorical, I ran a chi-square test (Analyze > Descriptive Statistics > Crosstabs, with Chi-square selected under Statistics and column percentages under Cells).
Crosstabulation: FEAR by SEX (illustrative)
| Afraid to walk alone at night | Male | Female | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | 214 (30.6%) | 401 (50.1%) | 615 (41.0%) |
| No | 486 (69.4%) | 399 (49.9%) | 885 (59.0%) |
| Total | 700 (100%) | 800 (100%) | 1,500 (100%) |
Chi-Square Tests (illustrative)
| Value | df | Asymptotic Significance (2-sided) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pearson Chi-Square | 59.008 | 1 | <.001 |
| Continuity Correction | 58.203 | 1 | <.001 |
| Likelihood Ratio | 59.665 | 1 | <.001 |
| Linear-by-Linear Association | 58.969 | 1 | <.001 |
| N of Valid Cases | 1,500 |
0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 287.00.
Step 3: Findings. The Pearson chi-square is 59.01 with 1 degree of freedom, and the two-tailed p value (Asymptotic Significance, 2-sided) is less than .001. Because p < .05, I reject the null hypothesis and keep the research hypothesis. In this illustrative sample, 50.1% of women reported fear of walking alone at night compared with 30.6% of men, a difference of about 20 percentage points. The result suggests that sex is related to fear of walking alone at night and that the relationship is unlikely to be due to sampling error, so it is likely to hold in the population of U.S. adults. A significant chi-square shows that a relationship exists, but it does not prove that sex causes fear; other factors such as age, neighborhood type and past victimization could also play a role and could be examined as control variables.
Tip: report the Pearson chi-square row for a chi-square test. For a t test, use the two-sided p in the row that matches Levene’s test result; for ANOVA, use the Sig. column in the ANOVA table; for regression, use the Sig. for your IV in the Coefficients table.
Frequently asked questions
Which p value do I report in SPSS?
Use the two-sided significance for the test you ran, such as Asymptotic Significance (2-sided) for the Pearson chi-square.
What if p is .051?
Then p is greater than .05, so you fail to reject the null hypothesis; the relationship is not statistically significant at the .05 level.
Does a significant result mean the IV causes the DV?
No. It means the relationship is unlikely to be due to chance in the sample. Causation requires stronger research designs and controls.
More model assignments posted today
- Barbara's Bouquets decision-making method
- Benefits of project management
- Microsoft Project Unit 1 tutorial
- Employment laws and organizational culture
- Mindfulness and neuroleadership
- Emotional intelligence in diverse settings
- Personal identity and communication
- Criticisms of Freud's dream theory
- Food safety quiz and family survey
- Probability rules for everyday decisions
- Climate change and emergency management
- Terrorism response and the Stafford Act
- Three-generation genogram guide
- Emotional intelligence case study
- APS, CRM and ERP comparison
- Hofstede power distance discussion
- Adolescent psychiatric assessment (Marissa)
- Nursing informatics and project management
- Crittenden County community health assessment
Get a plagiarism-free answer to this question
Send us your instructions and we’ll match you with the best writer in your subject.
- 100% human-written, zero AI
- Turnitin report included
- Confidential — we never share your data
- Free revisions & refunds
