MKT 300 Harley-Davidson Case Study: Brand Management, an Aging Core Customer and a Five-Year Brand Strategy

MKT 300 Week 9 Case Study: Harley-Davidson

Harley-Davidson has one of the strongest brand identities in any industry and an ageing core customer. Analyse the brand management problem that creates. Consider:

• What does the Harley brand actually stand for, and to whom? Separate what the company says from what the market believes.
• Where does its brand equity come from: awareness, associations, perceived quality, loyalty? Which of these is most at risk?
• The company has repeatedly tried to reach younger and broader riders, including electric models. Assess those attempts: did they extend the brand or dilute it?
• What is the real risk of repositioning a brand whose value rests substantially on heritage and community?

Recommend a brand strategy for the next five years and defend it against an obvious objection from the other direction.

Original example for study purposes (about 1,250 words). Company facts are current to mid-2026; add your course’s brand equity model (for example, Aaker or Keller) and textbook citations.

The Harley-Davidson Brand Problem: Heritage as Asset and Trap

What the Brand Stands For, and to Whom

What the company says. Harley-Davidson presents itself as a symbol of freedom, independence and the open road, rooted in more than a century of American motorcycling. In April 2026, new CEO Artie Starrs launched a “RIDE” brand platform that shifts the emphasis toward fun and the joy of riding; Starrs said the brand had become “too serious and, at times, too dark” (Pulse, 2026). The company also returned to its “MOTOR/CYCLES” logo design, signaling a return to its core identity (Motorcycle.com, 2026).

What the market believes. To its loyal riders, typically white, middle-aged and older men, Harley means belonging, rebellion within a respectable life, mechanical character and a community of fellow riders. To many younger people and women, however, the brand signals something different: older men, loud and heavy bikes, high prices, a leather-clad uniform and an image that feels exclusive or even intimidating. The median age of a Harley buyer reached 52 in 2024, up from the mid-40s in the early 2000s (Wignall, 2026). The gap between the company’s universal message of “freedom” and the market’s narrower image of who rides Harleys is the core of the problem.

Sources of Brand Equity and What Is Most at Risk

Using a customer-based brand equity lens, Harley’s equity comes from four sources:

• Awareness is extraordinarily high. Almost everyone recognizes the name and the bar-and-shield logo, and the brand has cultural reach far beyond motorcycling.
• Associations are rich: freedom, Americana, rebellion, craftsmanship, the V-twin sound and the Harley Owners Group community. These associations create meaning that few competitors can match.
• Perceived quality is strong for heavyweight cruisers and touring bikes, though rivals often lead on technology, weight and value.
• Loyalty is intense; some owners tattoo the logo on their bodies. But loyalty is concentrated in an aging group of buyers.

The most at-risk element is associations, specifically their relevance. The brand’s meanings are strong but tied to one generation’s identity. As older riders age out, loyalty will shrink unless new riders adopt those associations as their own. Retail sales fell 12% in 2025 to about 132,500 motorcycles, the fourth straight annual decline, and were down 32% from 2021 (Axios, 2026). Awareness without relevance does not produce sales.

Attempts to Reach Younger and Broader Riders

Smaller, cheaper bikes. The Street 500 and 750 (introduced in 2014) offered a lower entry price, but many critics and riders saw them as not “real Harleys,” and they were discontinued. The later X350 and X500, built with a partner in China and sold in some markets, raised similar questions about authenticity. These products reached new buyers on price, but they weakened brand fit because they lacked the sound, quality and status that define the brand.

Electric motorcycles (LiveWire). LiveWire was a bold attempt to show innovation and attract urban, tech-oriented riders. However, it struggled commercially: LiveWire sold 653 electric motorcycles in all of 2025 and posted large operating losses, far below early projections, and in March 2026 Harley confirmed a complete brand separation from LiveWire (Wignall, 2026). Separating LiveWire into its own brand was partly a recognition that an electric, silent motorcycle conflicts with associations built on the V-twin’s rumble.

Adventure and new segments. The Pan America adventure bike won praise from reviewers and showed Harley could compete on technology, but it targeted a crowded segment where buyers have few emotional ties to Harley.

Assessment. Overall, these attempts were more dilution than extension. They tried to reach new customers by moving away from what makes Harley distinctive, rather than by making the core meaning accessible to new people. Products that customers did not see as a logical expression of the brand created confusion without building loyalty.

The Real Risk of Repositioning

The real risk is losing the existing base without winning a new one. Heritage brands draw value from authenticity; if Harley tries too hard to look young, high-tech or politically trendy, loyal riders may feel betrayed and younger buyers may still see it as inauthentic. The brand’s community dimension makes this risk sharper. In 2024, after an online campaign by activist Robby Starbuck, Harley rolled back several diversity initiatives, and in 2026 he renewed his boycott (Wignall, 2026). This shows that changes in brand meaning are contested by the brand’s own community. Repositioning a heritage brand is not like changing a logo; it means negotiating identity with people who feel they own it.

Recommended Five-Year Strategy: “Widen the Door, Keep the House”

I recommend a strategy that keeps Harley’s core meaning, freedom, craftsmanship and community, but changes who is invited in and how easily they can enter.

1. Anchor the core. Protect the flagship cruiser and touring lines as the brand’s heart, with premium quality and the signature sound. Do not rebrand the core as something else.
2. Build an authentic entry ladder. Offer more affordable bikes that are still unmistakably Harley in look, sound and quality, made on existing platforms. The company’s 2026 “Back to the Bricks” plan already moves in this direction with lighter, more affordable models, the Sprint 440 and a returning air-cooled Sportster as “blank canvas” bikes that customers can personalize (Motorcycle.com, 2026). Pair them with financing, rider training and used-bike certification to lower barriers.
3. Reframe heritage as inheritance, not nostalgia. Tell stories of new riders, women, veterans and riders from diverse backgrounds who make the brand their own, emphasizing customization and community rather than one look. The RIDE platform’s focus on joy is a good start.
4. Make the community the product. Expand learn-to-ride programs, rental and subscription options, and Harley Owners Group events that welcome beginners, especially through dealers, who are the brand’s most important touchpoint.
5. Keep electric separate but learn from it. Let LiveWire develop independently and adopt successful technology into Harley products only when it fits the brand.

Success would be measured by the share of buyers under 40, first-time buyers, female riders, retention of existing owners and brand perception scores for “welcoming” and “fun.”

Defending the Strategy Against the Opposite Objection

Objection: “This is too timid. The motorcycle market is changing; Harley should reinvent itself boldly, with electric bikes and a modern image, before its customers literally age out.”

Response: Harley’s own history shows the cost of bold moves that ignore brand fit: LiveWire sold only hundreds of bikes a year while losing tens of millions of dollars, and earlier entry models failed to win acceptance. Harley’s competitive advantage is meaning, not technology; competitors can build faster or cheaper bikes, but they cannot copy a century of heritage and community. Abandoning that advantage would leave Harley competing on weaker ground. The recommended strategy is not standing still. It changes access, price, storytelling and the customer experience, which are the true barriers for younger riders, while keeping the meaning that gives the brand its value. If electric adoption accelerates, the separate LiveWire brand gives Harley an option without risking the core.

Conclusion

Harley-Davidson’s strength, a powerful heritage brand with fierce loyalty, has become its biggest risk because its associations are tied to an aging customer base. Past attempts to attract younger riders often diluted the brand rather than extending it. The best path for the next five years is to protect the brand’s core meaning while widening access to it through authentic entry products, welcoming communities and storytelling that makes heritage something new riders can inherit.

References

Axios. (2026, February 10). Harley-Davidson sales plunge as new CEO plots turnaround. https://axios.com/2026/02/10/harley-davidson-sales-trump-tariffs

Motorcycle.com. (2026, May). Harley-Davidson announces “Back to the Bricks” business plan. https://www.motorcycle.com/bikes/features/harley-davidson-announces-back-to-the-bricks-business-plan-44664700

Pulse. (2026, April 11). Harley-Davidson launches “RIDE” platform to shift brand toward fun, joy under CEO Artie Starrs. https://www.pulse.bot/marketing/news/harleydavidson-launches-ride-platform-to-shift-brand-toward-fun-joy-under-ceo-artie-starrs-c28ee964-3e62-43c9-9aab-eae876b3f7da

Wignall, J. (2026, July 15). Harley-Davidson, the motorcycle that defined America, fights for survival. Newsweek. https://www.newsweek.com/harley-davidson-motorcycle-defined-america-fights-for-survival-12195652

More model assignments posted today

• Milestone 7 branding strategy
• Psychology job advertisement assignment
• Sport communication and leadership study guide
• Technology and crime
• Decriminalization vs. legalization