The collection of evidence is an activity that occurs with an endgame in mind. For example, law enforcement professionals collect evidence to support a decis
The collection of evidence is an activity that occurs with an endgame in mind. For example, law enforcement professionals collect evidence to support a decision to charge those accused of criminal activity. Similarly, evidence-based healthcare practitioners collect evidence to support decisions in pursuit of specific healthcare outcomes.
In this Assignment, you will identify an issue or opportunity for change within your healthcare organization and propose an idea for a change in practice supported by an EBP approach.
To Prepare:
- Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you critically appraised in Module 4, related to your clinical topic of interest and PICOT.
- Reflect on your current healthcare organization and think about potential opportunities for evidence-based change, using your topic of interest and PICOT as the basis for your reflection.
- Consider the best method of disseminating the results of your presentation to an audience.
The Assignment: (Evidence-Based Project)
Part 4: Recommending an Evidence-Based Practice Change
Create an 8- to 9-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:
- Briefly describe your healthcare organization, including its culture and readiness for change. (You may opt to keep various elements of this anonymous, such as your company name.)
- Describe the current problem or opportunity for change. Include in this description the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with change implementation in general.
- Propose an evidence-based idea for a change in practice using an EBP approach to decision making. Note that you may find further research needs to be conducted if sufficient evidence is not discovered.
- Describe your plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation.
- Explain how you would disseminate the results of your project to an audience. Provide a rationale for why you selected this dissemination strategy.
- Describe the measurable outcomes you hope to achieve with the implementation of this evidence-based change.
- Be sure to provide APA citations of the supporting evidence-based peer reviewed articles you selected to support your thinking.
- Add a lessons learned section that includes the following:
- A summary of the critical appraisal of the peer-reviewed articles you previously submitted
- An explanation about what you learned from completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template (1-3 slides)
References:
- Hoffman, T. C., Montori, V. M., & Del Mar, C. (2014). The connection between evidence-based medicine and shared decision makingLinks to an external site.. Journal of the American Medical Association, 312 (13), 1295–1296. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.10186
- Kon, A. A., Davidson, J. E., Morrison, W., Danis, M., & White, D. B. (2016). Shared decision making in intensive care units: An American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society policy statementLinks to an external site.. Critical Care Medicine, 44 (1), 188–201. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000001396
- Opperman, C., Liebig, D., Bowling, J., & Johnson, C. S., & Harper, M. (2016). Measuring return on investment for professional development activities: Implications for practiceLinks to an external site.. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, 32 (4), 176–184. doi:10.1097/NND.0000000000000483
- Schroy, P. C., Mylvaganam, S., & Davidson, P. (2014). Provider perspectives on the utility of a colorectal cancer screening decision aid for facilitating shared decision makingLinks to an external site.. Health Expectations, 17 (1), 27–35. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00730.xThe Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. (2019). Patient decision aidsLinks to an external site.. https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/
NURS_6052_Module06_Week10_Assignment_Rubric
7/21/25, 8:33 PM Module 6 : Assignment
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/174419/assignments/2278313?module_item_id=6876439 1/4
Criteria Ratings Pts
Part 4: Disseminating ResultsCreate a, 8-9- slide narrated PowerPoint presentation of your Evidence-Based Project:Briefly describe the following: your healthcare organization and culture, current opportunity for change, scope of issue, and EBP best practice recommendation.Explain how you would plan knowledge transfer and dissemination.Describe measurable outcomes with the implementation of EBP best practice.Summarize lessons learned.
75 pts75 to >67.0 pts Excellent The narrated presentation accurately and completely summarizes the evidence-based project. The narrated presentation is professional in nature and thoroughly addresses all components of the evidence- based project. …The narrated presentation accurately and clearly describes in detail the healthcare organization and culture, current opportunity for change, scope of the issue, and EBP best practice recommendation. …The narrated presentation accurately and clearly describes how to plan for knowledge transfer, disseminate the results of the project to an audience, citing specific and relevant examples. …The narrated presentation clearly and accurately describes measurable outcomes with the implementation of the EBP best practice and summarizes lessons learned.
67 to >59.0 pts Good The narrated presentation adequately summarizes the evidence-based project. The narrated presentation is professional in nature and adequately addresses the components of the evidence- based project. …The narrated presentation accurately describes in detail the healthcare organization and culture, current opportunity for change, scope of the issue, and EBP best practice recommendation. …The narrated presentation accurately describes how to plan for knowledge transfer, disseminate the results of the project to an audience, citing specific and relevant examples. …The narrated presentation accurately describes measurable outcomes with the implementation of the EBP best practice and summarizes lessons learned.
59 to >52.0 pts Fair The narrated presentation vaguely, inaccurately, or incompletely summarizes the evidence-based project. The narrated presentation may be professional in nature and somewhat addresses the components of the evidence- based project. …The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes the healthcare organization and culture, current opportunity for change, scope of the issue, and EBP best practice recommendation. …The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes how to plan for knowledge transfer, disseminate the results of the project to an audience, citing specific and relevant examples. …The narrated presentation vaguely or inaccurately describes measurable outcomes with the implementation of the EBP best practice and summarizes lessons learned.
52 to >0 pts Poor The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately summarizes the evidence-based project or is missing. The narrated presentation is not professional in nature and inaccurately and incompletely addresses the components of the evidence- based project or is missing. …The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately describes the healthcare organization and culture, current opportunity for change, scope of the issue, and EBP best practice recommendation, no examples are provided, or it is missing. …The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately describes how to plan for knowledge transfer, disseminate the results of the project to an audience, citing no specific and relevant examples. …The narrated presentation vaguely or inaccurately describes measurable outcomes with the implementation of the EBP best practice and summarizes lessons learned.
7/21/25, 8:33 PM Module 6 : Assignment
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/174419/assignments/2278313?module_item_id=6876439 2/4
Criteria Ratings Pts
Resource Synthesis
5 pts
Presentation Narration 10 pts
PowerPoint Presentation:The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.
5 pts
5 to >4.0 pts Excellent The narrated presentation fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course- specific resources that fully support the presentation.
4 to >3.5 pts Good The narrated presentation integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course- specific resources that may support the presentation.
3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair The narrated presentation minimally integrates resources that may support the presentation.
3 to >0 pts Poor The narrated presentation fails to integrate any or presents minimal resources to support the presentation.
10 to >0.0 pts Excellent Narration is present.
0 pts Poor Narration is missing.
5 to >4.0 pts Excellent The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.
4 to >3.0 pts Good Eighty percent of the presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.
7/21/25, 8:33 PM Module 6 : Assignment
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/174419/assignments/2278313?module_item_id=6876439 3/4
Criteria Ratings Pts
Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.
5 pts
Total Points: 100
3 to >2.0 pts Fair Sixty to seventy nine percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.
2 to >0 pts Poor Less than sixty percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.
5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4 to >3.0 pts Good Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3 to >2.0 pts Fair Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
2 to >0 pts Poor Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
7/21/25, 8:33 PM Module 6 : Assignment
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/174419/assignments/2278313?module_item_id=6876439 4/4
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
