The Case of John Doe John Doe was convicted of robbery based on a single eyewitness testimony. However, security footage proving he was not at the crime scen

Scenario: The Case of John Doe

John Doe was convicted of robbery based on a single eyewitness testimony. However, security footage proving he was not at the crime scene was withheld by the prosecutor. After 12 years in prison, a Conviction Integrity Unit reviewed his case and uncovered the hidden evidence. John was exonerated, and the prosecutor faced no legal consequences due to prosecutorial immunity.

Student Response Questions:

1. What ethical violations occurred in this case? (Short answer – 3-5 sentences)
2. Should prosecutors lose their immunity if they engage in intentional misconduct? Why or why not? (Paragraph – 5-7 sentences)
3. What reforms could prevent cases like John Doe’s from happening again? (Short answer – 3-5 sentences)
4. What impact do wrongful convictions have on individuals and society? (Paragraph – 5-7 sentences)