Ecological Footprint Writing
SOC135NRC Assessment II (15%); Ecological Footprint; Due: Week 10 (24th March 2024 by 11.59 pm in BB) Objectives: 1. Determine if your current lifestyle is sustainable by calculating your ecological footprint (EF). 2. Reflect on what are some of the demands of your current lifestyle on the planet and what worldview, values do your lifestyle represent. (a) What does your overall EF suggest about the sustainability of your current lifestyle, given that we live on a single planet. (b) Compare and contrast the impact of specific consumption categories (shelter, mobility, food, etc.) on your EF. Justify the proportional contribution of these categories to your EF by using specific examples of your lifestyle choices. 3. Can your lifestyle become more sustainable and why are individual actions necessary to ensure sustainability? (a) Describe 2 lifestyle changes to reduce your EF and become more sustainable. Indicate (quantitative) reductions that these changes would lead to, by using external sources of evidence as supporting information. (The evidence should be derived from peer-reviewed articles, books, educational or institutional websites; no wikis or encyclopedias). i) Use APA formatting for in-text citations and reference list of sources used. A useful link for APA formatting is available here: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/10/ (b) Evaluate feasibility and potential challenges associated with implementation of the suggested changes. (c) Given the “Tragedy of the commons” concept and definition of sustainability, reflect on why it is important for you and other individuals to implement lifestyle changes. Instructions: Use the Ecological Footprint Calculator at: http://footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/calculators/ and select Ontario as your location to calculate your OWN Footprint. Make sure to save your quiz results (as an image or print the results to submit with your assignment). Keep track of your answers for each consumption category (food, goods, home (both shelter and electricity) and transportation). This information will help you evaluate your resulting ecological footprint and its breakdown for each consumption category. 1 You will submit the following to the instructor: • A printout (or if submitting an electronic version of the assignment) a ‘screen grab” of the results sheet from the Footprint Quiz (Objective 1). Please note, this section is pass and fail; it is worth 4 points if personal quiz results are included with the assignment. • Include a personal reflection on your EF (Objectives 2 and 3). The reflection should be written in your own words, in paragraphs. This section of the assignment should not exceed 3 pages in length (800 words, double-spaced and sided, using a 12-point font,). • Please see reverse for a detailed grading scheme. Reference list Global Footprint Network (2014). Glossary. Retrieved from: http://www.footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/glossary/#biologicallyproductivelanda ndwater Course Rules: This class has a ZERO tolerance policy of AI. Ø The AI rate should be below 1%, check from: https://www.zerogpt.com No argument of the AI similarity, I have already gave you the tool, check yourself before upload. https://copyleaks.com The AI test result should be green and shows that it’s Human Language. Ø The similarity of Turnitin.com should be below 7% from school requirement. Ø The AI % of Turnitin.com should be below 5% from school requirement. 2 3 NAT 260 NBA Assessment # 1 : Worth: 15% Criteria Objective # 1 Exceeds expectations Meets expectations 4 Personal EF Quiz results are provided with the assignment Objective # 2 10-7 7-6 In an insightful way discusses Discusses the sustainability of the the sustainability of the current current lifestyle and the worldview lifestyle and what worldview and, or values that the lifestyle and, or values the lifestyle represents. Compares and represents. In an insighful way contrasts the contributions of compares and contrasts the consumption categoires to the contribution of the overall EF. Supports the evaluation consumption categories to the by using some (or somewhat) overall EF and supports the relevant and (or somewhat) evaluation with highly specific specific examples of daily lifestyle and relevant examples of choices to illustrate the impact. lifestyle choices. Objective # 3 10-8 7-6 Suggests 2 creative and feasible Suggests 2 feasible solutions to solutions to reduce personal EF. reduce personal EF. Quantitative Provides highly relevant and information is provided to identify specific quantitative the magnitude of reduced impact information of the reduction in of the implemented changes, and personal impact that these is supported by evidence from (1changes would lead to. Uses >2 2) external sources. Provides good external sources that provide justification of the feasibility of evidence of support for those suggested changes and evaluates changes. Clearly justifies the challenges that these solutions feasibility of personal changes may present. Reflects on the need and critically evaluates potential of individual actions in reference challenges that these solutions to the tragedy of the commons. may present. In an insightful way reflects on the need of individual actions in reference to the tragedy of the commons. References 2 1 In-text citations and reference In-text citations and reference list list are formatted according to are formatted according to APA APA with no errors. with few errors. Total Deductions: Cohesion, style, spelling, grammar Due: Week 4 Below expectations 0 Personal EF Quiz results are not included 5-0 Lacks the discussion, or minimally evaluates whether the current lifestyle is sustainable and, or what worldview and, or values the current lifestyle represents. Minimally, or not at all compares and contrasts the consumption categories. Uses no, or few, or irrelevant, or vague examples of lifestyle choices to illustrate the results of personal EF. 5-0 Suggests a single, an irrelevant, or no solution to reduce personal EF. Does not provide, or provides minimal or irrelevant, quantitive information that would result from implemented changes. No external sources are used to support the quantitative reduction information. Minimally, or not at all evaluates the feasibility and challenges that these solutions may present. Minimally, or not at all reflects on the need of individual actions in reference to the tragedy of the commons. 0.5-0 In-text citations and/or reference list is either missing or have multiple errors. = /26 4 -1 Paper inconsistently organized but attempts to guide reader through arguments; scope of the paper may be too broad or narrow within the length. Some grammatical, punctuation or spelling errors (appears not to have been proof read). -2 Paper is disorganized and lacks coherent structure; scope of paper is unclear: significantly outside of the requirements. Grammar, punctuation, or spelling interfere with readability. Comments: 5
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
