Epidemiology Paper Part Three: Implementation and Evaluation
DNP 825 Week 7 Epidemiology Paper Part Three GCU
DNP 825 Week 7 Epidemiology Paper Part Three GCU
DNP 825 Week 7 Epidemiology Paper Part Three: Implementation and Evaluation
Details:
The Epidemiology Paper is a practice immersion assignment designed to be completed in three sections. This is part three of the assignment. Learners are required to identify theories for implementation and evaluation of prevention and health promotion activities for an at risk population.
General Guidelines:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
- This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
- Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
- This assignment requires that support your position by referencing at least six to eight scholarly resources. At least three of your supporting references must be from scholarly sources other than the assigned readings.
- You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Directions:
This assignment comprises the third and final part of the Epidemiology Paper. Write a 2,000-2,500 word paper that provides the following:
- Identify a public health theory you will use to support the implementation of your prevention and health promotion activities. Provide evidence that supports the use of this theory within the program you designed.
- Design evidenced-based prevention and health promotion activities that can be implemented to decrease the health risk among your previously identified population.
- Identify the evaluation program you will use to determine the efficacy of your health promotion activities and in meeting the expected outcomes.
Portfolio Practice Hours:
Practice immersion assignments are based on your current course objectives, and are intended to be application-based learning using your real-world practice setting. These assignments earn practice immersion hours, and are indicated in the assignment by a Portfolio Practice Hours statement that reminds you, the learner, to enter a corresponding case log in Typhon. Actual clock hours are entered, but the average hours associated with each practice immersion assignment is 10.
You are required to complete your assignment using real-world application. Real-world application requires the use of evidence-based data, contemporary theories, and concepts presented in the course. The culmination of your assignment must present a viable application in a current practice setting. For more information on parameters for practice immersion hours, please refer to DNP resources in the DC Network.
To earn portfolio practice hours, enter the following after the references section of your paper:
Practice Hours Completion Statement DNP-825
I, (INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed (NUMBER OF) clock hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I have also tracked said practice hours in the Typhon Student Tracking System for verification purposes and will be sure that all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice mentor.
Epidemiology Paper Part Three: Implementation and Evaluation Rubric
1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% |
2 Less than Satisfactory 74.00% |
3 Satisfactory 79.00% |
4 Good 87.00% |
5 Excellent 100.00% |
||
70.0 %Content | ||||||
5.0 %Completed Changes and Corrected Errors to Subsequent Paper, Including Transitions for a Scholarly Paper | Learner did not attach previous paper and did not make changes as indicated. | N/A | Learner attached previous paper and has made changes as indicated. Learner needs to incorporate transitions to connect the ideas between the papers. | Learner attached previous paper and has made changes as indicated. Learner needs to incorporate better transitions to connect the ideas between the papers. | earner attached previous paper and has made changes as indicated. Learner has includes all necessary transitions to create a scholarly paper. | |
10.0 %Six to Eight Additional Scholarly Research Sources With In-Text Citations | None of the required elements (minimum of six topic-related scholarly research sources and six in-text citations) are present. | Not all required elements are present. One or more elements are missing and/or included sources are not scholarly research or topic-related. DNP 825 Week 7 Epidemiology Paper Part Three GCU | All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related, but the source and quality of one or more references is questionable. | All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related and obtained from reputable professional sources. | All required elements are present. Scholarly research sources are topic-related and obtained from highly respected, professional, original sources. | |
15.0 %Identifies the Public Health/Health Promotion Theory That Was Used to Develop Health Prevention and Promotion Activities. Provides Rationale for Why This Theory Was Used | Paper does not identify a public health/health promotion theory to use in the development of health prevention and promotion activities. | Paper identifies a public health/health promotion theory to use in the development of health prevention and promotion activities. Paper does not provide rationale for why the theory was used. | Paper identifies a public health/health promotion theory to use in the development of health prevention and promotion activities. Rationale for why the theory was used is weak or inconclusive. | Paper identifies a public health/health promotion theory to use in the development of health prevention and promotion activities. Paper provides good rationale for why the theory was used. | Paper identifies a public health/health promotion theory to use in the development of health prevention and promotion activities. Paper provides strong and insightful rationale for why the theory was used. | |
20.0 %Provides Design and Projected Implementation of Health Prevention and Promotion Activities. Program Is Appropriate for Identified Population | Paper does not provide design or projected implementation for health prevention and promotion activities; or, program is inappropriate for identified population. | Paper provides basic design for health prevention and promotion activities, but does not include projections for implementation. Program does not directly relate to the identified population. | Paper provides design for health prevention and promotion activities and includes an outline for projected implementation. Program is sufficient for identified population. | Paper provides design for health prevention and promotion activities and includes projection for implementation. Program is appropriate for identified population. | Paper provides well thought out design for health prevention and promotion activities. Projection for implementation uses foresight and includes significant detail. Program is well thought out and appropriate for identified population. | |
20.0 %Program Evaluation to Determine Efficacy (Aligns Public Health Components Essential to Nursing Science; Demonstrates How These Components Are Essential to Effect Improvement on Population Health) | Paper does not establish alignment of public health components essential to nursing science. DNP 825 Week 7 Epidemiology Paper Part Three GCU | Attempts to align public health components essential to nursing science, but does not demonstrate how these components are essential to effect improvement on population health. | Paper aligns some of the public health components essential to nursing science and generally demonstrates how these components are essential to effect improvement on population health. | Paper aligns public health components essential to nursing science and demonstrates how these components are essential to effect improvement on population health. | Paper establishes a clear and strong alignment of public health components essential to nursing science. Demonstration of how these components are essential to effect improvement on population health is insightful and well supported. | |
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness | ||||||
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. | Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. | |
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness | ||||||
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. | |
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness | ||||||
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. DNP 825 Week 7 Epidemiology Paper Part Three GCU | |
10.0 %Format | ||||||
5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. | |
10.0 %Format | ||||||
5.0 %Research Citations (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) | No reference page is included. No citations are used. | Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. DNP 825 Week 7 Epidemiology Paper Part Three GCU | Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. | Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. | In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. | |
100 %Total Weightage |
Theories for implementation and evaluation of prevention and health promotion
Introduction
Prevention and health promotion are complex phenomena that involve a variety of social, behavioral, and ecological factors. Theories can help guide the development of interventions and evaluations aimed at increasing health outcomes through prevention efforts. This article provides an overview of current theories used to guide the implementation and evaluation of prevention efforts in public health practice.
Effective intervention or evaluation strategy
The first step in evaluating an intervention or program is to identify the components of the proposed strategy. This can be done by reviewing published literature, surveying experts, conducting interviews with individuals who have implemented similar programs in their communities and/or assessing the results of pilot studies. Once you know what components make up your strategy, it’s time to plan how you will evaluate each one.
The next step is determining which outcome(s) will be measured; this includes establishing which outcomes are most important for determining whether or not your program has been effective at helping people improve their health status or reduce their risk factors (e.g., smoking). The final step is developing a reliable process for measuring these outcomes after implementation so that they can be compared across time periods using appropriate statistical techniques such as regression analysis and correlation coefficients between variables that may influence one another over time periods after implementation has taken place
Toward a Public Health Action Framework
Theory of reasoned action (TRA):
This theory states that individuals make decisions based on the information they have at the time. They do so in a way that is consistent with their goals, values and beliefs. The TRA model provides three steps to help people develop effective health behaviors: 1) identify a problem; 2) decide what is needed to solve it; 3) set goals for solving it.
Theory of planned behavior (TPB):
The TPB model describes how behavior can change over time through planned actions or activities (e.g., exercising regularly). The TPB approach focuses on creating environments conducive for change such as using positive self-talk when coming up with ideas about changing one’s lifestyle habits. This also involves changing one’s attitude towards exercise by making it fun rather than painful or boring!
The PRECEDE-PROCEED framework
The PRECEDE-PROCEED framework is a model for the implementation and evaluation of health promotion programs. It consists of two phases:
-
The PRECEDE phase (problem identification) involves asking an open question such as, “What do you want to change?” or “How can we help?” This stage focuses on identifying your target population, setting goals, and finding resources.
-
The PROCEED phase (prevention planning) involves developing a plan that includes how to implement your program and how it will be evaluated.
The Social Ecological Model
The social ecological model is a framework for understanding the influence of the environment on individual behavior. It divides the environment into three levels:
-
Individual level (also called microsystem)
-
Microsystem level (also called mesosystem)
-
Exosystem level (also called exobiology). In this model, each of these levels has its own set of influences that affect human health and well-being.
Social Cognitive Theory
Social cognitive theory is a framework for understanding and explaining how people’s attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors are influenced by others. Social cognitive theory can be used to determine whether a behavior change technique is successful in changing health-related behaviors.
Social cognitive theory argues that the way people think about their own abilities and those of others determines what they do on a daily basis. When people believe that other people are more capable than themselves, they will naturally try harder to achieve their goals (for example). On the other hand when we think that we’re not as skilled at something as our peers, we may give up easily or avoid using it altogether because it feels too difficult; this could lead us down a negative path where instead of improving our skills over time through practice (technique), we simply stop doing things altogether because they seem impossible despite having tried hard enough times before in order to reach success (behavior).
Social learning theory describes how children learn new skills through observation of adults around them performing similar tasks successfully — watch me do this! — rather than just sitting around waiting until someone teaches them how themselves later down line because they didn’t see anyone else doing anything wrong while practicing their own task beforehand either…
Self-Determination Theory
Self-Determination Theory
Self-Determination Theory is a theory of motivation and behavior that focuses on intrinsic motivation, or the desire to be motivated by something other than external rewards or punishments. The theory was first developed by Kurt Lewin at Harvard University in 1935. It suggests that people have a strong desire to be able to control their own behavior and make choices for themselves, which can be satisfied through participation in their own activities. In order to do this effectively, they need adequate information about what they are doing and why it matters; they also need sufficient opportunity for reflection on these issues (Lewin & Maccoby).
Theory of Reasoned Action/Theory of Planned Behavior
The Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) is a theory that suggests that people act in ways based on their beliefs and expectations. In other words, the TRA says that people’s behavior is planned or goal-directed. The TRA was developed by Ajzen and Fishbein (1977).
Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) is an extension to the TRA by Dearing (1991). TPB uses a multivariate framework to explain why individuals are not likely to engage in preventive health behaviors because they believe it will be too time consuming or difficult to maintain over time.
Transtheoretical Model of Behavior Change/Stages of Change Model
-
The Transtheoretical Model of Behavior Change (TTM) is a model that describes the process by which people move from one stage to another. It was developed by Otto Scharmer and his colleagues at the University of Maryland.
-
TTM proposes four stages, each with its own set of behaviors: precontemplation, contemplation, preparation and action. People in this stage have not yet considered changing their behavior but may be interested in doing so if they are exposed to information about health or illness behaviors (e.g., by watching a health video). Those who are currently engaged in healthy lifestyles do not need motivation to change—they know how they want their lives to be lived and implement changes accordingly without external prompting; however, some people need outside guidance on how best to accomplish specific goals within their lives or careers so that they can reach them successfully.*
Conclusion
In conclusion, the theories we have discussed in this article are not meant to be a comprehensive list of theories but rather are a starting point for discussion. As with any field of study, there is much more research to be done on prevention and health promotion interventions. We hope that this article has provided an overview of some key ideas in the field that will help guide your own research!
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.