SOCW 6060 Week 5 Assignment

SOCW 6060 Week 5 Assignment

Assignment: Application of Crisis Theory and Resiliency Theory to a Case Study

It is common for social workers to be presented with a crisis situation brought forth by clients, families, communities, and/or organizations. The ultimate goal is to restore the client to equilibrium. The five stages of the crisis are (1) the hazardous event, (2) the vulnerable stage, (3) the precipitating factor, (4) the state of active crisis, and (5) the reintegration or crisis resolution phase.

There are times when a social worker will use more than one theory to assist in conceptualizing the problem and intervention, particularly if the theories complement each other. For example, resiliency theory can be used alongside crisis theory.

To prepare: Review and focus on the same case study that you chose in Week 2. Helen Petrakis

Submit a 1- to 2-page case write-up that addresses the following:

•        Map the client’s crisis using the five stages of the crisis.
•        Describe the client’s assets and resources (in order to understand the client’s resilience).
•        Describe how you, the social worker, will intervene to assist the client to reach the reintegration stage of the crisis. Be sure that the intervention promotes resiliency.
•        Evaluate how using crisis theory and resiliency theory together help in working with a client.
•  

Be sure to:

•        Identify and correctly reference the case study you have chosen.
•        Use literature to support your claims.
•        Use APA formatting and style.

o   Remember to double-space your paper.

SAMPLE ANSWER

Application of Crisis Theory and Resiliency Theory to a Case Study

Introduction

In this blog post, we will be applying crisis theory and resiliency theory to a case study. We will first provide a brief overview of each theory and then apply them to the case study. Crisis theory posits that there are underlying conditions in society that give rise to crises. These crises can be political, economic, or social in nature. Resiliency theory, on the other hand, focuses on how individuals and groups can bounce back from adversity. While both theories are useful in understanding crises, they differ in their focus and approach. In this blog post, we will use both theories to analyze a case study of the Syrian refugee crisis. By understanding the causes of the crisis through crisis theory and the ways in which people have coped with it through resiliency theory, we can gain a more complete understanding of this complex issue.

What is Crisis Theory?

Crisis theory is a social science theory that suggests that society is constantly in a state of flux, with periods of stability punctuated by moments of crisis. Crisis theory has its roots in the work of the German sociologist Karl Marx, who argued that history is characterized by class struggle.

Crisis theory posits that moments of crisis are not only moments of danger, but also opportunities for radical change. In times of crisis, the status quo is challenged and new ways of thinking and living become possible.

Resiliency theory is a related social science theory that suggests that individuals and communities have the ability to bounce back from adversity. Resiliency theory emphasizes the importance of social support systems in times of crisis.

The application of crisis theory and resiliency theory to a case study can help us to understand how individuals and communities respond to periods of upheaval. It can also help us to identify strategies for promoting positive outcomes during times of crisis.

What is Resiliency Theory?

Crisis theory and resiliency theory are two different but related approaches to understanding and responding to crisis situations. Crisis theory focuses on the individual or group in crisis, and emphasizes the need for timely intervention to prevent further deterioration. Resiliency theory, on the other hand, emphasizes the individual or group’s ability to rebound from a crisis situation.

Both theories have their strengths and weaknesses, but when applied together, they provide a well-rounded approach to understanding and responding to crisis situations. In this blog post, we’ll take a look at how crisis theory and resiliency theory can be applied to a real-world case study.

The case study we’ll be using is that of James Holmes, the gunman who opened fire in a movie theater in Aurora, Colorado in 2012. As you may recall, Holmes killed 12 people and injured 70 others in one of the deadliest mass shootings in US history.

We’ll start by looking at how crisis theory can be used to understand Holmes’ actions leading up to the shooting. According to crisis theory, there are three main phases of a crisis: pre-crisis, acute phase, and post-crisis. The pre-crisis phase is characterized by a build-up of stressors that eventually lead to the acute phase of the crisis. In Holmes’ case, some of the stressors that may have contributed to his eventual breakdown were his failing grades at school, his recent breakup with his girlfriend, and his growing

Applying Crisis Theory to the Case Study

Crisis theory posits that there are three factors that contribute to a crisis: a stressor, an individual’s response to the stressor, and the level of support available to the individual. In order for a crisis to occur, all three of these factors must be present.

Applying this theory to the case study, we can see that the stressor was the loss of the family’s home and belongings in the fire. The individual’s response to this stressor was to become withdrawn and depressed. The level of support available to the family was insufficient, as they did not have access to counseling or other resources that could help them deal with their grief.

The lack of support led to the development of new stressors, such as financial difficulties and relationship problems. These new stressors exacerbated the original problem, leading to a full-blown crisis.

If adequate support had been available to the family, it is possible that they would have been able to cope with their loss and prevent a crisis from occurring. However, in this case, crisis theory provides a useful framework for understanding how and why the family became overwhelmed by their problems.

Applying Resiliency Theory to the Case Study

When faced with a difficult situation, it is often helpful to look to theory for guidance. In the field of psychology, there are many different theories that can be applied to help explain and predict behavior. In this blog post, we will examine how two specific theories, crisis theory and resiliency theory, can be applied to a real-life case study.

Crisis theory posits that individuals go through stages of reaction when faced with a traumatic event. These stages include shock, denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance. It is important to note that not everyone will experience all of these stages – some people may move more quickly through them while others may get stuck in one stage for an extended period of time.

Resiliency theory focuses on an individual’s ability to bounce back from adversity. This ability is thought to be influenced by several factors, including social support, positive coping strategies, and a sense of control over one’s life. Individuals who are more resilient tend to fare better in the face of difficulties than those who are less resilient.

Conclusion

In conclusion, it is evident that crisis theory and resiliency theory are both applicable to the case study of John Doe. Crisis theory provides a framework for understanding how John Doe got to the point of crisis, and how he might be able to prevent future crises. Resiliency theory, on the other hand, offers a way to understand how John Doe can bounce back from this particular crisis and become stronger as a result. By applying both theories to the case study, we can gain a more comprehensive understanding of John Doe’s situation and develop a plan to help him overcome his challenges.