THE SPIRIT OF MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING
There is an old adage that “practice makes perfect,” which is particularly relevant to learning a new set of skills like those associated with motivational interviewing. Over the next several weeks, the Assignments are designed to give you opportunities to practice specific motivational interviewing skills that are introduced in the Discussions.
In this week’s Discussion, you practiced applying the spirit of motivational interviewing to a service user in the case study to which you were assigned. As you may remember, the spirit of motivational interviewing is a heart-set and mindset that encompasses four elements that are crucial for building a relationship with a service user: partnership, acceptance, compassion, and evocation (Miller & Rollnick, 2013). In this Assignment, you will review a series of practitioner statements to determine whether the statements reflect the spirit of motivational interviewing.
Reference: Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change(3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.
THE SPIRIT OF MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
WEEKLY RESOURCES (https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157591)
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157567
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157567
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157591
HUMN_6161_Week2_Assignment_Rubric
Review the Learning Resources on the spirit of motivational interviewing. Review the document entitled, “Rating Samples for MI Spirit.” Consider whether each of the exchanges is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing. Why, or why not?
Submit a 2- to 3-page paper that addresses the following:
Explain whether each exchange in the “Rating Samples for MI Spirit” document is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing. Why, or why not? Be specific. In instances where you do not believe that the exchange is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing, explain how the practitioner could have responded to be consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing. Again, be specific.
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK2Assgn1_LastName_Firstinitial.
2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page. 3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
TO PREPARE
BY DAY 7
SUBMISSION AND GRADING INFORMATION
https://waldenu.instructure.com/courses/92806/modules/items/3157591
Criteria Ratings Pts
20 pts
22.5 pts
7.5 pts
Explain whether each exchange in the “Rating Samples for MI Spirit” document is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing. Why, or why not? Be specific.
20 to >17.8 pts Exceeds Expectations Explanation of whether each exchange is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing is accurate and complete. Specific and convincing justifications are provided.
17.8 to >15.8 pts Meets Expectations Explanation of whether each exchange is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing is mostly accurate and complete. Relevant justifications are provided.
15.8 to >13.8 pts Fair
Explanation of whether each exchange is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing is somewhat inaccurate and/or incomplete. Vague justifications are provided.
13.8 to >0 pts Needs Improvement Explanation of whether each exchange is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing is inaccurate, incomplete, or missing altogether. No justifications are provided.
In instances where you do not believe that the exchange is consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing, explain how the practitioner could have responded to be consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing. Again, be specific.
22.5 to >20.02 pts Exceeds Expectations Explanation of how the practitioner could have responded is specific, appropriate, and consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing.
20.02 to >17.78 pts Meets Expectations Explanation of how the practitioner could have responded is mostly specific, appropriate, and consistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing, although there may be minor errors, inaccuracies, or missing details.
17.78 to >15.52 pts Fair Explanation of how the practitioner could have responded is vague, somewhat inaccurate, or somewhat inconsistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing. There may be errors, inaccuracies, or missing details.
15.52 to >0 pts Needs Improvement Explanation of how the practitioner could have responded is missing, inaccurate, or inconsistent with the spirit of motivational interviewing. There may be major errors, inaccuracies, and missing details.
Scholarly Writing and APA Style
7.5 to >6.68 pts Exceeds Expectations
6.68 to >5.93 pts Meets Expectations
5.93 to >5.18 pts Fair
5.18 to >0 pts Needs Improvement
Total Points: 50
Criteria Ratings Pts
The paper is clear and coherent. Student writes with proper grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation to convey their scholarly message. Fewer than 5 errors occur in the paper. The paper displays proper scholarly voice, organization, and focus. Student paraphrases evidence from scholarly sources correctly and integrates and analyzes it effectively. Includes citations and a reference list that are mostly formatted correctly in APA Style. Headings and paper formatting reflect proper APA.
The paper is mostly clear and coherent. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are minor, minimal (5-8), and do not interfere with the scholarly message. The paper displays effective scholarly voice, organization, and focus. Student paraphrases evidence from scholarly sources correctly, but integration and analysis could be improved. Includes citations and a reference list, but they contain minor APA errors. Headings and paper formatting contain minor APA errors.
The paper is somewhat clear and coherent. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are minor but frequent (9-12) and occasionally interfere with the message. The paper has lapses in scholarly voice. The paper lacks clear organization or occasionally strays from the focus. Student occasionally paraphrases source information incorrectly. Includes citations and a reference list, but they contain major APA errors. Headings and paper formatting contain major APA errors.
The paper lacks clarity and coherence. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are major, pervasive (13+), and interfere with the message. The paper shows little or no attention to scholarly voice, organization, and focus. Student consistently paraphrases source information incorrectly (resulting in accidental plagiarism) and/or relies exclusively on direct quotes. Citations are infrequent or missing. Little or no attempt has been made to provide a reference list or to format
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
