NSG321 Advanced Leadership and Management_UNIT3_Project on Ethical Issues
Order InstructionsUnit 3Project on Ethical IssuesUnit 3: Introduction (Required Content) (1 of 4)Unit 3 Discussion: Diversity in the Workplace (2 of 4)Current Assignment: Unit 3 Assessment: Project on Ethical Issues, Assignment (3 of 4)Unit 3 Assessment: Shadow Health – Conflict Management, Assignment (4 of 4)
InstructionsPick an ethical or legal issue in nursing leadership. You may use any of the subjects discussed in prior units or select an issue which is of significance nationally.Create a PowerPoint presentation detailing this issue. Include background information, why this is an issue, the role of the leader in managing this issue, and proposed solutions.Identify an ethical or legal issue in nursing, describe background information, and detail why the issue exists.Identify an ethical or legal issue in nursing, identify the roles of the leader in managing the issue, and describe multiple proposed solutions.This is to be a 10-15 slide presentation.Add presenter notes to the slide to enhance the content of the slides, as if you were presenting to a group, and this is your script.In PowerPoint, access “notes view” to see the presenter notes boxes.Slides should not contain paragraphs of narrative. They should contain only bullet points or brief explanations.The longer narratives go in your presenter notes.Speaker’s notes content will be graded under the “content” sections of the rubric.Lack of speaker’s notes will significantly affect the grades in those areas.Create a reference slide and put all references used in the presentation.4-5 references are required.Include citations on the slides.For format and guidelines for PowerPoint presentations check out the Purdue Online Writing Lab (Links to an external site.) web site. (Links to an external site.)Upload to this assignment submission area by Sunday night at 11:59 pm CT.
Estimated time to complete: 6 – 8 hours
RubricNSG321 Presentation RubricNSG321 Presentation RubricCriteria Ratings PtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of Knowledge20 ptsLevel 5Connects and extends knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/ field/ discipline to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.16 ptsLevel 4Analyzes knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/ field/ discipline making relevant connections to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.12 ptsLevel 3Begins to connect knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/ field/ discipline to civic engagement and to tone’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.8 ptsLevel 2Begins to identify knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/ field/ discipline that is relevant to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.4 ptsLevel 1There Is some evidence that knowledge is identified (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/ field/ discipline that is somewhat relevant to civics engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.0 ptsLevel 0There is little to no evidence that knowledge is identified (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/ field/ discipline that is somewhat relevant to civics engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.20 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDefines Content30 ptsLevel 5Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.27 ptsLevel 4Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed24 ptsLevel 3Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.21 ptsLevel 2Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.18 ptsLevel 1Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement.0 ptsLevel 0There is no evidence of a defined statement.30 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRelationship to Research15 ptsLevel 5Evaluates materials for scholarly significance and relevance within and/or across the various disciplines, evaluating them according to their contributions and consequences.13.5 ptsLevel 4Examines materials for scholarly significance within and/or across the various disciplines to explore contributions in relation to important questions.12 ptsLevel 3Uses materials in the context of scholarship to develop a foundation of disciplinary knowledge and to raise and explore important questions.10.5 ptsLevel 2Engages materials with the intention and expectation of building topical and world knowledge.9 ptsLevel 1Approaches materials in the context of assignments with the intention and expectation of finding right answers and learning facts and concepts to display for credit.0 ptsLevel 0There is little to no evidence of engagement with outside materials used in a scholarly manner.15 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion and Related Outcomes15 ptsLevel 5Conclusions (consequences and implications) are logical and reflect informed evaluation and the ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order.12 ptsLevel 4Conclusions are logically tied to and reflect student’s informed evaluation in priority order and are clearly identified.9 ptsLevel 3Conclusion is logically tied to a range of information and are identified clearly.6 ptsLevel 2Conclusion is logically tied to information (because information is chosen to fit the desired conclusion).3 ptsLevel 1Conclusion is inconsistently tied to some of the information discussed and oversimplified.0 ptsLevel 0Conclusion is either not present, unclear, or does not reflect the information presented.15 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting10 ptsLevel 5The presentation exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The presentation has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.8 ptsLevel 4The presentation exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The presentation has no errors in mechanics, or spelling and minor error do not impair the flow of communication.6 ptsLevel 3The presentation exhibits an acceptable command of written English language conventions. The presentation has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.4 ptsLevel 2The presentation exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The presentation has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.2 ptsLevel 1The presentation exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The presentation has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.0 ptsLevel 0The presentation does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The presentation has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Formatting10 ptsLevel 5The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.8 ptsLevel 4The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.6 ptsLevel 3The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.4 ptsLevel 2The required APA elements are not all included. AND/OR there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.2 ptsLevel 1Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.0 ptsLevel 0There is little to no evidence of APA formatting. AND/OR there are no in-text citations AND/OR references.10 ptsTotal Points: 100
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
