Describe the impact of discrimination and oppression on marginalized groups within communities Use recent social work literature – you can choose any group or community to write about. Remem
social work multi-part question
Unit 10Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
INSTRUCTIONS
The assignment this week is to write a paper about the importance of inclusive communities and ways in which macro social workers can advocate for inclusion.
Write a 3 -4 page paper (double spaced) covering the prompts below.
Please be sure to cite your sources and add a reference page at the end (not included in the 3 pages).
Describe the impact of discrimination and oppression on marginalized groups within communities
Use recent social work literature – you can choose any group or community to write about.
Remember community doesn’t have to be a geographic community but could be an identification community.
You can use Social Work Today, or any information in the Social Work Library Guide.
Describe the benefits of inclusion in communities.
Describe how inclusive environments impacts individuals and communities.
Based on the Community tool kit readings, identify and discuss 3 strategies for increasing inclusion in the community.
Describe the role of macro social workers and how they can advocate for inclusion and populations at risk.
Complete this assignment and submit it to this assignment dropbox by Sunday at 11:59 pm CT.
Estimated time to complete: 4 hours
Rubric
MSW521 DEI Assignment Rubric
MSW521 DEI Assignment Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic
4 pts
Level 5
Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic that addresses potentially significant aspects of the topic.
3.2 pts
Level 4
Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic that addresses important and notable aspects of the topic.
2.4 pts
Level 3
Identifies a focused and manageable/doable topic that appropriately addresses relevant aspects of the topic.
1.6 pts
Level 2
Identifies a topic that while manageable/doable, is too narrowly focused and leaves out relevant aspects of the topic.
0.8 pts
Level 1
Identifies a topic that is far too general and wide-ranging as to be manageable and doable.
0 pts
Level 0
Does not clearly identify a topic that is relative to the assignment.
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExisting Knowledge, ResearchDescribes the impact of discrimination and oppression on marginalized groups within communities.
9 pts
Level 5
Synthesizes in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches.
7.2 pts
Level 4
Examines in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches.
5.4 pts
Level 3
Explains in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches.
3.6 pts
Level 2
Explains in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches.
1.8 pts
Level 1
Relates information from irrelevant sources representing limited points of view/ approaches.
0 pts
Level 0
Information is irrelevant to the topic. No clear point of view/approaches.
9 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExisting Knowledge, ResearchDescribe the benefits of inclusion in communities
Describes how inclusive environment impacts individuals and communities
9 pts
Level 5
All elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are skillfully developed. Appropriate methodology or theoretical frameworks may be synthesized from across disciplines or from relevant sub-disciplines.
7.2 pts
Level 4
Most critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are appropriately developed. Appropriate methodology or theoretical frameworks may be analyzed from across disciplines or from relevant sub-disciplines.
5.4 pts
Level 3
Some critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are appropriately developed, however, more subtle elements are ignored or unaccounted for.
3.6 pts
Level 2
Critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are missing, incorrectly developed, or unfocused.
1.8 pts
Level 1
Inquiry design demonstrates a misunderstanding of the methodology or theoretical framework.
0 pts
Level 0
The design of the paper is not based upon a clear methodology or framework.
9 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisIdentify and analize 3 strategies for increasing inclusion in the community
9 pts
Level 5
Organizes and synthesizes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
7.2 pts
Level 4
Organizes and analyzes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
5.4 pts
Level 3
Organizes evidence to reveal important patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
3.6 pts
Level 2
Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing important patterns, differences, or similarities.
1.8 pts
Level 1
Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
0 pts
Level 0
Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
9 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisDescribe the role of macro social workers and how they can advocate for inclusion and populations at risk.
9 pts
Level 5
Organizes and synthesizes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
7.2 pts
Level 4
Organizes and analyzes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
5.4 pts
Level 3
Organizes evidence to reveal important patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
3.6 pts
Level 2
Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing important patterns, differences, or similarities.
1.8 pts
Level 1
Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
0 pts
Level 0
Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
9 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion
5 pts
Level 5
States a conclusion that is a logical extrapolation from the inquiry findings.
4 pts
Level 4
States a conclusion that is a logical interpretation of the inquiry findings.
3 pts
Level 3
States a conclusion focused solely on the inquiry findings. The conclusion arises specifically from and responds specifically to the inquiry findings.
2 pts
Level 2
States a general conclusion that, because it is so general, also applies beyond the scope of the inquiry findings.
1 pts
Level 1
States an ambiguous or unsupportable conclusion from inquiry findings.
0 pts
Level 0
No conclusion is presented
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Formatting
5 pts
Level 5
The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.
4 pts
Level 4
The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
3 pts
Level 3
The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
2 pts
Level 2
The required APA elements are not all included. AND/OR there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
1 pts
Level 1
Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.
0 pts
Level 0
APA is not used
5 pts
Total Points: 50
Requirements: 1
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.