My PICOT question: In adolescents aged 12-18 years, how does

My PICOT question:
In adolescents aged 12-18 years, how does using a depression screening tool in primary healthcare settings, compared with the usual standard of care, affect identifying depression within three months?

two studies:
1. 1. Beck, A., LeBlanc, J. C., Morissette, K., Hamel, C., Skidmore, B., Colquhoun, H., Lang, E., Moore, A., Riva, J. J., Thombs, B. D., Patten, S., Bragg, H., Colman, I., Goldfield, G. S., Nicholls, S. G., Pajer, K., Potter, B. K., Meeder, R., Vasa, P., Hutton, B., … Stevens, A. (2021). Screening for depression in children and adolescents: a protocol for a systematic review update. Systematic reviews, 10(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01568-3
2. Roseman, M., Saadat, N., Riehm, K. E., Kloda, L. A., Boruff, J., Ickowicz, A., Baltzer, F., Katz, L. Y., Patten, S. B., Rousseau, C., & Thombs, B. D. (2017). Depression Screening and Health Outcomes in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review. Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie, 62(12), 813-817. https://doi.org/10.1177/0706743717727243
Assignment 2: Evaluation Table Template
Complete the Evaluation Table Template with the results from the two strongest external evidence studies supporting the above PICOT question.
Determine the strength of each of the two (2) studies using the rating system in Melnyk and Fineout-Overhol
Include a legend on the evaluation table
Study 1 Study 2
Citation: (i.e., author(s), date of publication, & title)
Level of Evidence
Level:
Level:
Purpose of the Study
Theory or Conceptual Framework
Design/ Method
Sample/ Setting
Major Variables Studied and
Their Definitions
Measurement of Major Variables
Data
Analysis
Study Findings
Strength of the Evidence (i.e., level of evidence + quality [study strengths and weaknesses
Strengths:
Weaknesses:
Strengths:
Weaknesses:
Legend: