Analysis Assignment Social Capital and Networking Behavior Write a paper, 1-2 pages and single-spaced, that addresses the following questions as it pertains to your pers
Analysis Assignment – Social Capital and Networking Behavior
Write a paper, 1-2 pages and single-spaced, that addresses the following questions as it pertains to your personal and work situations, tying in specific course readings/videos/PowerPoint information. When doing so, please italicize specific concepts or terms used and cite the reading or website link (2 or more cites). Given that I am familiar with all references from this course you can simply put the names of the authors or the website link in parentheses to cite.
1. Complete the Network Diagram Task. What is your career goal? How do you evaluate the quality of your social network for obtaining your career goal? Why?
Note: Please see attached net work diagram attachment. just go through the diagram and complete the exercise(No need to submit)just for writing what we have seen from exercises.
I am currently working as software developer and my goal is to become project manager and lead the development team
2. Considering the information in the article on the Impact of Social Networks on the Advancement of Women and Minorities, what career impacts due to social networks in organizations have you experienced personally or have witnessed? Discuss.
Note: Please see attached attached file Social Capital ,chapter 8,A balanced article and answer
3. Complete the Networking Behavior Exercise. How much are you participating in networking behavior? Where do you target your networking behavior the most? Why? What prevents you from participating in networking behavior?
Note: Please see attached networking Assessment file and do the exercise and answer(No need to submit the exercise just give summary in paper)
4. How do you feel about networking in general? Considering the information on the PowerPoint pertaining to networking behavior, the Balanced Scorecard article, and the Adam Grant video, where do you think you need to improve in regards to your networking behavior? What steps could you take to assist you in this improvement?
Video link: https://www.ted.com/talks/worklife_with_adam_grant_networking_for_people_who_hate_networking?referrer=playlist-worklife_with_adam_grant_mar_2019
Note: Go through the articles and ppt and answer accordingly.
Note: Citing not required ,if referring's to the the readings, you can just give the last name of the authors or can state their names in the sentence for example you can write like According to Forrest,the social networks of women etc…According James networking creates or impact human behavior etc..
Social Capital and the Impact of Networking Behavior
Dr. Monica Forret
*
*
Careers Today
- Era of the “boundaryless career” as opposed to the “organizational career” conceived to unfold in a single employment setting (Arthur & Rousseau, 1996).
- Change in the psychological contract.
- Notion of employability becoming one’s career goal (Hall, 1996). Emphasizes performing self-assessments, upgrading one’s skills, and networking.
*
*
Human Capital vs.
Social Capital
- Human Capital – The investments we make in ourselves:
Our education
Prior work experiences
Training
Knowledge, skills, and abilities
“What you know”
*
*
Social Capital
- Social capital represents the resources available to an individual as a result of one’s personal network of contacts (Baker, 2000).
- Social capital provides ideas, information, resources, and opportunities.
- “Who you know”
*
*
Social Capital is a Source of Competitive Advantage
- Social capital is difficult to duplicate.
- The quality of our relationships with others is a unique, valuable, nonreplicable asset.
- Social capital extends to whom our contacts know, and so on.
*
*
What Does Your Network
Look Like?
- Size – a larger network helps.
- Structure – how “connected” are your contacts? Less redundancy provides more information.
- Composition – a diverse network (e.g., age, gender, occupation) extends one’s reach.
*
*
Mary’s Network
Ballet
Sponsor
Mary
Church
Prof.
Org.
Friends/
Family
Softball
Team
Service
Club
Past
Clients
*
*
Networking as a Method to
Improve Your Social Capital
- Networking can increase the size, power, and diversity of one’s contacts.
- Networking can increase the number of nonredundant contacts in one’s network.
*
*
Networking
- Individuals’ attempts to develop and maintain relationships with others for the purpose of mutual benefit in their work or career (Forret & Dougherty, 2001).
*
*
Different Views of Networking
- “I guess I wouldn’t feel so strongly about it if I weren’t so bad at it.”
- “Networking is very valuable to me – in my line of work, it is the way to be successful.”
- “Networking evokes positive and negative images for me. The more people I know, the easier to get things done. But it is a problem if you are on the outside of an important network.”
*
*
Networking Comes Easier to
Some People
- Individuals who are:
Extraverts
High in self-esteem
From higher socioeconomic backgrounds
More accepting of workplace politics
- However, all of us can improve our networking skills.
*
*
“Work” is Part of Networking
- Networking is an investment you make in yourself. It involves:
Time
Energy
Effort
Money
*
*
Networking is about Giving
- “The goal of building networks is to contribute to others” (Baker, 2000, p. 70).
- Networking is based upon trust.
- Helping others increases the likelihood of you receiving help – it invokes the norm of reciprocity.
*
*
Networking is Not:
- Selling
- Manipulating or deceiving people
- Violating the “Golden Rule”
*
*
When Done Poorly, Networking May Be Perceived As:
- Slimy
- Cheating
- Unethical
- Highly political
*
Benefits from Networking are Many
- Jobs
- Referrals
- Information & Ideas
- Social Support
- Job Satisfaction
- Career Sponsorship
- Income
- Promotions
- Career Satisfaction
- Affective Commitment
*
*
Barriers to Networking
- Lack of time
- Fear of not being able to reciprocate
- Discomfort in meeting new people
- Fear of being seen as needy
*
*
Asking for Help
- Becomes much easier after you’ve developed relationships with people.
- State your needs, and ask for suggestions or ideas.
- Do not be demanding.
*
*
Career Goals Should Influence Networking Efforts
- What are your short and long term goals?
- Assess your current social capital. Who should be a member of your network?
- Align your networking efforts. Consider 3 key domains: organization, profession, and community
*
*
How Intense and Focused are Your Networking Efforts?
- Networking in Your Organization
- Networking in Your Profession
- Networking in Your Community
*
*
Which Groups to Join?
- Are you interested in the group’s mission?
- Are the members people you want to meet?
- Will it provide developmental assistance?
- Are the meeting times convenient?
- Are the dues affordable?
- Try it out first – Attend as a guest!
*
*
Approaching New People
- Do your homework – get bios of individuals if possible. Look for commonalities.
- Initiate conversations. Pretend you are a host. Arrive early, meet organizers, offer help.
- Establish rapport by asking others about themselves.
- Call people by name throughout conversation.
- Ask open-ended questions and be a good listener.
- Send a nice follow-up note.
*
Your Needs Change, and so Does Your Networking
- Sometimes you need to scale back your efforts in a particular area. Especially if:
You no longer find the activity rewarding
You’ve established a solid reputation
It is very time consuming and prevents you from developing new contacts
It no longer provides you with developmental opportunities
*
*
Reevaluate Your Social Capital
- How has your network changed?
- Assess the quality of the relationships you’ve developed.
- Are you an active contributor to others?
- What other networking efforts could be implemented to enhance your social capital?
*
*
Ineffective Networking Behaviors
- Joining groups, but not actively participating in them.
- Asking favors prematurely of people for whom you have no relationship.
- Not thanking individuals who have helped you.
- Failure to follow-up on promises made.
*
*
Effective Networking Behaviors
- Listening to people and understanding their needs and feelings.
- Treating individuals, regardless of status, with respect and dignity.
- Following the ‘norm of reciprocity.’
- Recognizing individuals who have helped you.
*
*
,
Impact of Social Networks on the Advancement of Women
and RaciallEthnic Minority Groups
Monica L. Forret
here have been glimmers of progress in U.S. corporations for women and bers of racial and ethnic minority groups. In 2002, Fortune published its ist of the 50 Most Powerful Black Executives in ~mer i ca . ' The Executive
eadership Council, a professional network for senior African American ex- utives in Fortune 500 firms, has grown from I9 members in 1956 t o over 340 embers today, with women making up one-third of the membership. Although e signs of upward movement are becoming more visible, the pace is slow. For stance, although women account for about half of all managerial a n d profes- onal positions, they hold only 8 percent of executive vice president positions d higher at Fortune 500 companies, and only 5 percent are among the top five ghest paid for each company.*
A number of explanations exist for the lack of upward advancement for omen and minorities. A Catalyst study found that both Fortune 1000 CEOs d women executives agreed that lack of line experience was a major factor eventing women's upward movement. Other major barriers cited include ex- usion from informal networks, negative stereotypes about women, lack of ac-
ountability of top leaders for advancing women, lack of role models, lack of entoring, and lack of awareness of organizational politics.3 Constraints posed social networks can help explain the obstacles women and minorities face that ult in their restricted upward movement in organizations. The constraints me in a variety of forms, such as increased difficulty in forming social networks
and lower levels of influence held by the members of their social networks. onsistent with Ragins's definition, the term nlinority will be used here to refer those groups traditionally lacking power in organizations-including women d members of racial and ethnic groups.4
In this chapter, I will first discuss the need for more attention to the social pita1 of minorities and important factors to consider in building social net- rks. Second, I explore three major barriers minorities face in developing their
1 52 Orgariizational Practices and Indiv idual Strategies
control the flow of information between them, which may be used to one's advantage.22 In addition to Burt, Podolny and Baron found that structural holes were associated with upward mobility, and Rodan and Galunic showed that they were related to greater managerial pe r fo rmar~ce .~~
F i r ~ a l l ~ , the resources of a tie refer to the benefits that may be derived from a relationship. These benefits may take a wide variety of forks, including in- formation, friendship, materialslservices, and i n f l u e n ~ e . ' ~ In particular, re- lationships with high-status individuals have the potential to provide valued outcomes. To illustrate, in their study of job seekers, Lin, Ensel, and Vaughn found that the status of the contact had a strong positive effect on the prestige of the attained job, indicating the ability of powerful contacts to exert influence on one's behalf.25
T o summarize, network size, tie strength, pattern of ties, and resources of ties are critical factors to consider in building one's social network. However, mino~ities experience unique barriers in their attempts to develop their social networks, which will now be considered.
BARRIERS MINORITIES FACE IN BUILDING THEIR SOCIAL NETWORKS
Three explanations for the difficulties minorities experience in building their social networks are centered on: ( 1 ) the similarity-attraction paradigm, (2) tokenism theory, and (3) existing organizational structures.
Similarity-Attraction Paradigm
Using Byrne's similarity-attraction paradigm, those who are considered si- milar on ascriptive characteristics (e.g., gender, race, ethnicity) are likely to perceive greater interpersonal similarities, which in turn leads to increased attrac- t ~ o n and more frequent c o i ~ ~ m u n i c a t i o n . ~ ~ Gender, racial, and ethnic sin~ila- rities facilitate interactions with others like oneself. Similarity on these factors increases the likelihood ofshared values, beliefs, and attitudes, which helps reduce uncertainty and create trusting relationships. For example, Tsui and O'Reilly found that subordinates in same-gender superior-subordinate dyads were rated higher in perceived effectiveness and lilting by their superiors and experienced lower role conflict and ambiguity than subordinates in mixed-gender dyadsz7
According to March and Simon, similarity on ascribed characteristics influences t l ~ e "language compatibility" between two people and makes com- munication easier.28 Roberts and O'Reilly found that participants in a coin- ~nunication network tend to have higher job satisfaction, more organizational commitment, and higher job performance than isolate^.'^ Furthermore, by communicating frequently, individuals develop similar attitudes and beliefs, which facilitate their integration into the o r g a n i ~ a t i o n . ~ ~
Impact of Social Networks on Women and Minor i ty Groups 153
Mou~ever, the similarity-attraction paradigm poses a problem for minorities in organizations in that the demographic makeup offers fewer opportunities for interactioi~s with others like themselves based on gender, race, or et l~nici ty.~ ' For example, based on a sample of managers from four Fortune 500 companies, Ibarra found that minorities had fewer same-race ties and fewer strong ties than white This lack of similarity affects the availability of social support for minority employees. Furthermore, given that minorities have less power in organizations, ties to other minorities are less instrumental in their ability to provide access to valued resources. Therefore, minorities have to seek out dis-
. similar others to obtain what they need. This necessity was illustrated in Ibarra's study of an advertising firm, in which men developed both instrumental and expressive (i.e., fi-iendship) contacts with other males, whereas females devel- oped instrumental contacts with men and expressive contacts with women.
3 3
Tokenism Theory
According to Kanter, the presence of a small, easily identifiable minority group of individuals (referred to as tokens) results in increased performance pressures and boundary heightening. Given that minorities are highly visible in
: organizations, they face added pressures to perform. If a niinority employee performs poorly, it is more liltely to be known throughout the organization. This may encourage ~n,ajority employees to distance tliemselves from minorities to avoid negative perceptions that association might convey. Furthermore, the
: behavior of a minority employee is likely to be construed as being symbolic for
1 ' the group. For example, if a woman fails at her position, majority members are ' likely to view this as evidence that women as a group are unable to handle those
types of jobs.34 Bouildary heightening occurs due to polarization that magnifies distinc-
tions betweell minority and majority groups. Boundary heightening results in an ' increase in stereotyping and isolation of minorities from areas where informal
socializing and politicking take place.35 To illustrate, Ely found that sex-role stereotypes were exaggerated in law firms dominated by men, in contrast to
: firms with a more balanced gender r e ~ r e s e n t a t i o n . ~ ~ Furthermore, Lyness and Thompson found that female executives were more likely than male executives to report lack of culture fit and bein excluded from informal networks as barriers to their career advancement."These results support the research on
; organizatioilal interaction networks in that minorities, due to their token status, have less access to members of the dominant power structures. 3 8
According to Baron and Pfeffer, white males are motivated to prescrve the ingroupioutgroup distinctions to protect their status and privilege in organizations.
39
'
Applying tokenism theory to the building of social networks, one c a n surmise that there will be a tendency for white males to avoid developing relationships with minority employees, resulting in smaller social networks comprised of less instru~nental contacts.
154 Organizational Practices and Individual Strategies Impact of Social Networks on Women and Minority Groups 155
Existing Organizational Structures
An individual's position in the organizational structure influences that person's social n e t w ~ r l i . ~ ~ T l ~ e hierarchy ofauthority indicated by an organization chart determines the superior and subordinates one interacts with to facilitate vertical coordination. Furthermore, the design and flow of the work necessitates coordination with other individuals, and changes in the technology used have been found to affect communication patterns.41 T o the extent that the job held calls for coordination with individuals from a variety of work units, there is more opportunity to develop personal relationships, which may influence network size, the strength of ties, the pattern of ties
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.