Armed bank robbery with a dangerous weapon
Need help with this assignment?Get an original answer from a qualified tutor — from $10/page.
Get it written →CASE CITATION KEY FACTS RULE(S) OR HOLDING
APPLICATION OF
RULE TO FACTS
United States V Canter: Armed bank robbery with a dangerous weapon
charged with one count of armed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §2113(a) and (d) 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a) & (d) under section 2113 (d) a toy gun is a dangerous weapon and it was held that the toy gun used in robbery was “dangerous weapon”
U.S. v. Martinez-Jimenez, 864 F.2d 664 (9th Cir. 1989)
convicted by the US District Court for armed bank robbery, appealed
18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) & (d)
even though if not used in an assaultive manner, a toy gun is a dangerous weapon and it was held that the toy gun used in robbery was “dangerous weapon”
United States v. Dixon, 790 F.3d 758 (7th Cir. 2015)
convicted of two armed bank robberies, 18 U.S.C. § 2113(d), sentenced to life in prison, and appealed
18 U.S.C. § 2113(d)
a life sentence is mandatory under 18 U.S.C. § 3559(c)(1)(A) because of Dixon’s criminal record
long-neck butane lighter was not “dangerous weapon or device” within meaning of federal bank robbery statute
§ 3559(c)(2)(F)(ii) classifies this as “serious violent felonies” because each of his prior convictions was for a crime that had the threat of violence as an element and a maximum term of at least 10 years imprisonment
SYNTHESIZED RULE: (NEED HELP WITH THIS PART PLEASE!!!-this is for the three cases above)
Get a plagiarism-free answer to this question
Send us your instructions and we’ll match you with the best writer in your subject.
- 100% human-written, zero AI
- Turnitin report included
- Confidential — we never share your data
- Free revisions & refunds