Do you think that juvenile attorneys should be able to give arguments and present evidence about guilt vs innocence at initial detention hearing

Do you think that juvenile attorneys should be able to give arguments and present evidence about guilt vs innocence at initial detention hearing? In your opinion do you think this initial detention hearing could serve as a trial where guilt or innocence is at least discussed if not proven? Why do you think this might be a good or bad idea?

WEEK 10 FLASHBACK: THE INITIAL DETENTION HEARING The Juvenile Court Process in Somerset County The INTAKE/SCREENING Process If the police request DETENTION HEARING detention, the MUST HAPPEN WITHIN 24 HOURS (PHONE HEARING RISK SCREENING TOOL ON WEEKENDS/HOLIDAYS, THENIN -PERSON ON NEXT is completed by Family Case BUSINESS DAY) Management, and the score ATTORNEY AND PARENT MUST PARTICPATE determines if the youth it: Court Placed in detention JUVENILES HAVE NO RIGHT TO BAILINNJ Released on a detention READ COMPLAINT. ESTABLISH PROBABLE CAUSE TAKEN INTO alternative program ONLY DECIDE WHETHER TO RELEASE OR DETAIN (NO POLICE Released to a parent/ PLEA ENTERED) CUSTODY guardian IF REMANDED, MUST HAVE A REVIEW HEARING IN COURT EVERY THREE WEEKS REFER TO PROSECUTOR FOR INTAKE! SCREENING DETENTION? 3:12 / 54:24