The Court of Appeal overturned the decision of the trial judge and found: Mr Finch could not claim for his psychiatric injury, applying the test set out in Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] HL

FINCH v REDFORD (2022) Previous Hearings: The Court of Appeal overturned the decision of the trial judge and found: Mr Finch could not claim for his psychiatric injury, applying the test set out in Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] HL, and did not award damages to Mr Finch. Moot point Mr Finch, the Appellant, now appeals to the Supreme Court on the following ground: That the Respondent owes him a duty of care and, as such, damages for his psychiatric injures are recoverable. Mrs Redford has already conceded that, if the Supreme Court holds that a duty of care is owed, liability will be established.