Psychopharmacologic Approaches to Treatment of Psychopathology
Need help with this assignment?Get an original answer from a qualified tutor — from $10/page.
Get it written →Psychopharmacologic Approaches to Treatment of Psychopathology
Psychopharmacologic Approaches to Treatment of Psychopathology
Discussion: Foundational Neuroscience
As a psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner, it is essential for you to have a strong background in foundational neuroscience. In order to diagnose and treat clients, you must not only understand the pathophysiology of psychiatric disorders, but also how medications for these disorders impact the central nervous system. These concepts of foundational neuroscience can be challenging to understand. Therefore, this Discussion is designed to encourage you to think through these concepts, develop a rationale for your thinking, and deepen your understanding by interacting with your colleagues.
1. Explain the agonist-to-antagonist spectrum of action of psychopharmacologic agents.
2. Compare and contrast the actions of g couple proteins and ion gated channels.
3. Explain the role of epigenetics in pharmacologic action.
4. Explain how this information may impact the way you prescribe medications to clients. Include a specific example of a situation or case with a client in which the psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner must be aware of the medication’s action.
ORDER COMPREHENSIVE NURS_6630 SOLUTIONS NOW
Name: NURS_6630_Week1_Discussion_Rubric
| Outstanding Performance | Excellent Performance | Competent Performance | Proficient Performance | Room for Improvement | |
| Main Posting: Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. |
44 (44%) – 44 (44%)
Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s) is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. supported by at least 3 current, credible sources |
40 (40%) – 43 (43%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth supported by at least 3 credible references Psychopharmacologic Approaches to Treatment of Psychopathology |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to most of the discussion question(s) is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. 50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth supported by at least 3 credible references |
31 (31%) – 34 (34%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s) one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references |
0 (0%) – 30 (30%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. contains only 1 or no credible references |
| Main Posting: Writing |
6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Written clearly and concisely Contains no grammatical or spelling errors Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style |
5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
Written clearly and concisely May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Written concisely May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style |
4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)
Written somewhat concisely May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors Contains some APA formatting errors |
0 (0%) – 4 (4%)
Not written clearly or concisely Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style |
| Main Posting: Timely and full participation |
10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Meets requirements for timely and full participation posts main discussion by due date |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirement for full participation |
| First Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. | 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings responds to questions posed by faculty the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives |
8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings Psychopharmacologic Approaches to Treatment of Psychopathology |
7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting |
6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on topic, may have some depth |
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Response may not be on topic, lacks depth |
| First Response: Writing |
6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English |
5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are answered if posed Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources Response is written in Standard Edited English |
4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed Few or no credible sources are cited |
0 (0%) – 4 (4%)
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective Response to faculty questions are missing No credible sources are cited |
| First Response: Timely and full participation |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for timely and full participation posts by due date |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirement for full participation |
| Second Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. |
9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives |
8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings Psychopharmacologic Approaches to Treatment of Psychopathology |
7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting |
6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on topic, may have some depth |
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Response may not be on topic, lacks depth |
| Second Response: Writing |
6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English |
5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are answered if posed Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English NURS_6630 |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources Response is written in Standard Edited English |
4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed Few or no credible sources are cited |
0 (0%) – 4 (4%)
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective Response to faculty questions are missing No credible sources are cited |
| Second Response: Timely and full participation |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for timely and full participation Posts by due date |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA |
Get a plagiarism-free answer to this question
Send us your instructions and we’ll match you with the best writer in your subject.
- 100% human-written, zero AI
- Turnitin report included
- Confidential — we never share your data
- Free revisions & refunds