HCA 812 Week 6 Assignment: State v Federal Laws
HCA 812 Week 6 Assignment: State v Federal Laws
In addition to the Affordable Care Act (ACA), there are multitudes of other state and federal regulations that apply to health care. In this assignment, you will investigate these regulations and their influence on quality of care as well as organizational effectiveness and sustainability.
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
Instructors will be using a grading rubric to grade the assignments. It is recommended that learners review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment in order to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.
Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.
Directions:
Research one state and one federal law other than the Affordable Care Act (ACA) with which health care organizations must currently comply and that seem to be contradictory to one another.
Prepare a presentation of 10-12 slides with speaker notes for each slide. Appropriate APA format should be used for references and citations. The references slide(s) are in addition to the slide count given above. The presentation should do the following:
Identify each of the laws (one state and one federal) being addressed.
Outline the major provisions of each law.
List current and potential effects of each law on the quality of patient care.
List current and potential effects of each law on the effectiveness of health care organizations under the law.
List current and potential effects of each law on organizational sustainability.
List the ethical issues that could arise through compliance with each law.
HCA 812 Week 1 Discussion 1 Example Solution
Consider the six organizational cases described by Blass in the module readings. Extending these ideas, under what circumstances could an individual forfeit the right to self-regulation? Why? At what point, if any, does self-regulation become unethical? Why?
In each of the Blass cases individuals falsified information. Each case was different and each had unethical events that occurred. False documentation in a medical or health record is not only wrong for the practice, but for the patient. When one is thinking about health care or care in general, patients are thinking about their own medical safety and that they are in the best of hands. In the Blass (2010) cases, one of the board committees stated regard any false certification as being an extremely serious matter because it weakens the confidence of the public and damages the integrity of the profession. The trust is broken between the relationship and the partnership. According to Blass (2010) the ten guiding principles outlined for the veterinary profession as stated on the RCVS website and publications are that ‘your clients are entitled to expect that you will:
Make animal welfare your first consideration in seeking to provide the most appropriate attention for animals committed to your care
Ensure that all animals under your care are treated humanely and with respect
Maintain and continue to develop your professional knowledge and skills
Foster and maintain a good relationship with your clients, earning their trust, respecting their
views and protecting client confidentiality
Uphold the good reputation of the veterinary profession
Ensure the integrity of veterinary certification
Foster and endeavour to maintain good relationships with your professional colleagues
Understand and comply with your legal obligations in relation to the prescription, safe-keeping
and supply of veterinary medicinal products
Familiarize yourself with and observe the relevant legislation in relation to veterinary surgeons
as individual members of the profession, employers, employees and business owners
Respond promptly, fully and courteously to complaints and criticism
The individuals in the 6 cases falsified information for their own benefit and had to suffer for the consequences. In case #6, Sarah signed a certificate basically saying the horse had a clean bill of health when the animal truly had a deserving procedure in two legs (Blass, 2010). As a business point of view, Sarah may have been trying to sell the horse, but it would have came to haunt her afterwards. If the horse was to come to multiple health issues Sarah would have been held liable for the certificate that she released to the purchaser.
Reference:
Blass, E. (2010). The failure of professional self-regulation: The example of the UK veterinary profession. Journal of Business Systems, Governance & Ethics, 5(4), 1-12.HCA 812 Week 6 Assignment: State v Federal Laws
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
