In the film, the narrator explains that early on in U.S. history people were divided and categorized based on wealth and religious affiliation and not color
Need help with this assignment?Get an original answer from a qualified tutor — from $10/page.
Get it written →part 1
Watch : The Power of an Illusion: “The Story We Tell” (episode 2) (Links to an external site.)
1) In the film, the narrator explains that early on in U.S. history people were divided and categorized based on wealth and religious affiliation and not color. According to the film, what were the reasons that division and categorization shifted from wealth and religious affiliation to skin color? Use your concepts here to “frame” your answer (SPEC)
2) According to the film, Jefferson saw categorized “Indians” and “blacks” or “negros” differently. What were some of the differences in the way they were categorized? Why do you think that Jefferson and others categorized them differently?
3) According to the film, eventually, the “Indians” status also changed. What did it changed and resulted in “Indian Removal” . What changed and why did it change? What does this change tell us about what race is and how it operates?
part 2
Watch:
Race: The Power of an Illusion: “The House we Live In” (Links to an external site.)
Answer the following questions (minimum one page double-spaced)
1) Your questions (Questions you have )
2) The narrator and one of the speakers in the film tell us that the percentage of “negro” of “black” ancestry necessary to be considered “negro” changed from state to state. What does this tell us about “race” as a category?
3)There were two court cases discussed pertaining to the issue of race. In the first one discussed, the Japanese petitioner asked for his full citizenship based on his light skin color as well as his ideas. The court rejected him stating that so-called ‘science’ indicated that he was non-white and therefore not fully American. The second petitioner, an Indian man, decided to petition the court based on the same ‘science’ that was used to reject the first petitioner. The court also rejected the Indian petitioner stating this time that ‘science’ didn’t matter, but what did matter was common knowledge and understanding of what was white to the average ‘American’. What does this tell us about race and they way it functions, and is understood in U.S. society.
4) What is “redlining” and “blockbusting” how does it relate to
Get a plagiarism-free answer to this question
Send us your instructions and we’ll match you with the best writer in your subject.
- 100% human-written, zero AI
- Turnitin report included
- Confidential — we never share your data
- Free revisions & refunds