One is a sample, and the other is work i have already started. See page 17 of the sample i provided, it tells you where to stop.UnderArmourStra
One is a sample, and the other is work i have already started. See page 17 of the sample i provided, it tells you where to stop.
Under Armor Strategic Audit (2009 – 2010)
2
11
EXHIBIT 1
EXTERNAL FACTOR ANALYSIS SUMMARY (EFAS) on UNDER ARMOUR (UA)
External Factors |
Weight: |
Rating: |
Weighted Score |
Comments |
Opportunities: |
||||
O1: Expanding Brand Name |
.15 |
3.0 |
.45 |
UA was started by Plank in 1996 and he used inexpensive marketing strategies and techniques to introduce UAs products into the sports apparel market. This category is given a weight of .15 and a rating of 3.0 because Plank expanded his brand by sending out free T-shirts with his brand name Under Armour to a network of equipment managers at the college level. |
O2: Innovation/Research |
.15 |
3.5 |
.525 |
Ten companies account for 30% of sports apparel. UA created a product that was made from synthetic material. Innovation is weight at .15 and has a rating of 3.5 because of the performance apparel that is compressed and controls temperature/moisture. |
O3: Outsourcing |
.10 |
3.5 |
.35 |
Just like the other big-name sports apparel companies, UA took advantage of outsourcing to manufacturers in Asian and Latin countries. This is weighted at .10 and given a rating of 3.5 because of the purchasing power of the raw material used to produce its apparel. |
O4: Customers |
.20 |
4.0 |
.80 |
UA sports appeal was sold at major retail stores. For example, Dick’s Sporting Goods and The Sports Authority, are frequently visited by customers. Just these two retailers alone accounted for over 30% of its wholesale. This factor is given a weight of .20 and a rating of 4.0 for the expansion to independent retailers, Foot Locker, Finished Line and the internet. |
Threats: |
||||
T1: Competition from Nike, Adidas, Champion, New Balance, and Puma |
.10 |
4.0 |
.40 |
Nike and Adidas are UA’s biggest competitors overall but when it comes to sports apparel, Champion is their main competitor. UA’s weight is 1.0 and rating is 4.0 for its apparel but must focus on other products outside of apparel to stay competitive. |
T2: Footwear Line |
.15 |
2.0 |
.30 |
UA’s footwear line was second only to Nike. So, in 2009 UA released a new running shoe line to be competitive in the 5 billion dollars athletic footwear market. The running shoes featured technology that would help enhance performance. This category’s weight is .15 and the rating is 2.0 because the footwear line did not live up to expectations and had to discount its inventory. |
T3: Global Market |
.10 |
2.5 |
.25 |
UA’s leadership understood the importance of the global markets for its apparel products. UA depended on the U.S. market and the lack of effort to market their products in other geographic areas has affected their revenues compared to other companies such as Nike. This area has a weight of .10 and the rating is 2.5 due to its lack of expansion into the global market. |
T4: Apparel Prices |
.05 |
2.0 |
.10 |
UA’s prices for its apparel are comparable to Nike and Adidas. But UA’s product policy is to ask for full price on its merchandise because of the brand name. In this case, the weight is .05 and the rating is 2.0 because the company’s position is not to offer discounts on its product but was forced to on footwear. |
Total Scores: |
1.00 |
3.175 |
UA is performing at above average as a company. |
EXHIBIT 2
INTERNAL FACTOR ANALYSIS SUMMARY (IFAS) on UNDER ARMOUR (UA)
Internal Factors |
Weight: |
Rating: |
Weighted Score |
Comments |
Strengths: |
||||
S1: Marketing Strategy |
.15 |
4.5 |
.675 |
UA should provide more options of apparel and target a larger diverse audience for their products. The company generated millions of dollars by advertising its products through movies and with professional athletes. The weight is .15 and the rating is 4.5 because the company uses sports and media marketing to improve its profit. |
S2: Product Development |
.15 |
4.0 |
.60 |
UA created high-performance apparel made from synthetic fabric that kept customers dryer than competitors’ products. The weight is .20 and the rate is 5.0 because apparel absorbs sweat faster, kept the body cooler, and prevented skin irritation. |
S3: Operations |
.20 |
5.0 |
1.0 |
UA created a special manufactory that catered to its loyal and special customers. The apparel for major sports teams and athletes is produced in a 17,000 square factory in Maryland. Operations weight is .20 and its rating is 5.0 because they provide great customer service and meet the customers’ needs and expectations. |
S4: Culture |
.10 |
3.5 |
.35 |
UA’s top management team consisted of Plank’s family, and friends and they are a close network. The company leadership embodied the teamwork culture, just like their customers. Plank set the tone to be competitive against Nike and Adidas. Culture is given a weight of .10 and a rating of 3.5 because the management team shared the same values, beliefs, and ideas to grow the company. Also, they worked out every Saturday morning to keep that bond intact. |
Weaknesses: |
||||
W1: Seasonal Profit |
.05 |
1.5 |
.075 |
UA’s profits are based on seasonal sporting events. The company should focus on producing products for other sports that will create profits. For example, soccer, tennis, track, golf, etc. Seasonal profits are weighted at .05 and the rating is at 1.5 mainly because its footwear has fallen behind its competitors and the lack of optional gear. |
W2: Finances |
.10 |
3.5 |
.35 |
Apparel, footwear, accessories, and licensing generate most of the AU’s revenue. The company’s 2009 gross profit margins declined because of both the liquidation of unsold footwear and apparel products. Finances are weighted a .10 and the rating is 3.5 because of the declining profits. UA’s products must stay competitive with Nike, Adidas, and other companies. |
W3: Global Market |
.15 |
2.5 |
.375 |
The United States and Canada generated 94% of UA’s revenue. Top management understands that in order to be successful, its’ company must strive in the international markets. The global market is weighted at .15 and the rating is 2.5 because UA products mainly depend on the U.S. market, which generated around 78% of its revenues. Outside of U.S. distribution channels revenue is less than 25%. |
W4: Distribution Network |
.10 |
2.0 |
.20 |
UA only had two distribution facilities in the U.S. and a third party delivered its products. The weight is .10 and the rating is .20 because retailers are responsible for returning products and outsourcing production was slow. |
Total Scores: |
1.00 |
3.6.25 |
UA’s overall operation is competitive and above average. |
EXHIBIT 3
STRATEGIC FACTOR ANALYSIS SUMMARY (SFAS) on UNDER ARMOUR (UA)
Strategic Factors |
Weight |
Rating |
Weighted Score |
S H O R T |
I N T E R M E D I A T E |
L O N G |
Comments |
S3: Operations |
.15 |
4.5 |
.675 |
X |
UA created a special manufactory that catered to its loyal customers. The apparel for major sports teams and athletes is produced in a 17,000 square factory in Maryland. This SF weight is high at .15 as the quality of its products meets customers’ expectations. The rating is 4.5 because UA provides great customer service to sports teams. |
||
S1: Marketing Strategy |
.05 |
4.5 |
.225 |
X |
X |
X |
UA should provide more options of apparel and target a larger diverse audience for their products. The company generated millions of dollars by advertising its products through movies and with professional athletes. The SF weight is .10 because of the target audience. The rating is 4.5 as using professional athletes generated millions of dollars. |
Its S2: Product Development |
.10 |
4.0 |
.40 |
X |
X |
UA created high-performance apparel made from synthetic fabric that kept customers dryer than competitors’ products. The weight is high at .10 with the development of Performance Apparel. The rating is 4.0 because apparel absorbs sweat faster, kept the body cooler, and prevented skin irritation. |
|
W3: Global Market |
.05 |
2.0 |
.10 |
X |
X |
The United States and Canada generated 94% of UA’s revenue. Top management understands that to be successful, its’ company must strive in the international markets. This weight is a low .05 as they lag behind other companies. The rating is 2.0 UA mainly depends on the U.S. market, which generated around 78% of its revenues. Outside of U.S. distribution channels revenue is less than 25%. |
|
W2: Finances |
.05 |
3.0 |
.15 |
X |
X |
X |
Apparel, footwear, accessories, and licensing generate most of the AU’s revenue. The company’s 2009 gross profit margins declined because of both the liquidation of unsold footwear and apparel products. This weight is low .05 as sales of products dropped. The rating is 3.0 because of the decline in gross profits margins. |
W4: Distribution Network |
.05 |
2.5 |
.125 |
X |
X |
UA only had two distribution facilities in the U.S. and a third party delivered its products. The weight is low at .05 because retailers are responsible for returning products. The rating is 2.5 as the outsourcing production is slow at times which affects the delivery of the products. |
|
O4: Customers |
.15 |
3.0 |
.45 |
X |
X |
UA sports appeal is sold at major retail stores. For example, Dick’s Sporting Goods and The Sports Authority. These two retailers accounted for over 30% of its wholesale. This SF is high at .15 because apparel is sold at major retail stores. The rating is 3.0 for expansion to independent retailers, Foot Locker, Finished Line, and the internet. |
|
O2: Innovation/Research |
.10 |
4.0 |
.40 |
X |
X |
Ten companies account for 30% of sports apparel. UA created a product made from synthetic material. The weight is .10 for using synthetic material to make apparel. I give this a rating of 4.0 because the performance apparel is compressed for comfort and controls temperature/moisture. |
|
O1: Expanding Brand Name |
.15 |
3.0 |
.45 |
X |
UA was started by Plank in 1996 and he used inexpensive marketing strategies and techniques to introduce UAs products into the sports apparel market. This SF weight is .15 for UA’s inexpensive marketing of its products. The rating of 3.0 is for expanding the brand by sending out free T-shirts with his brand name Under Armour to a network of equipment managers at the college level. |
||
T2: Footwear Line |
.05 |
1.5 |
.075 |
X |
In 2009, UA released a new running shoe line to be competitive in the 5 billion dollars athletic footwear market. The running shoes featured technology that would help enhance performance. This category’s weight is .05 as UA invested a lot of money in its’ footwear to stay competitive. The rating is 1.5 because the footwear line did not live up to expectations and had to discount its inventory. |
||
T1: Competition from Nike, Adidas, Champion, New Balance, and Puma |
.10 |
3.5 |
.35 |
X |
X |
X |
Nike and Adidas are UA’s biggest competitors but when it comes to sports apparel, Champion is their main competitor. This SF weight is .10 because UA must produce more products outside of apparel. The rating is 3.5 for its apparel staying very competitive in the sports apparel market. |
T3: Global Market |
.05 |
2.5 |
.125 |
UA’s leadership understands the importance of the global markets for its apparel products. This SF weight is .05 because UA depends on the U.S. market. I give this a rating of 2.5 for the ineffective marketing of its products in other geographic areas. |
|||
Total Scores: |
1.00 |
3.525 |
UA’s overall performance is above average. |
EXHIBIT 7
TOWS MATRIX on UNDER ARMOUR (UA)
Internal Factors (from IFAS)
External Factors (from EFAS) |
Strengths (S) S1 Marketing Strategy S2 Product Development S3 Operations S4 Culture |
Weaknesses (W) W1 Seasonal Profit W2 Finances W3 Global Market W4 Distribution Network |
Opportunities (O) O1 Expanding Brand Name O2 Innovation/Research O3 Outsourcing O4 Customers |
S/O Strategies · Target a larger group of customers (O1, O4, S1, S2, S4). · Continue to capitalize with marketing athletes (O1, O2, O4, S1, S4). · Infiltrate competitor’s product market (O2, O4, S1, S2, S4). |
W/O Strategies · Expand seasonal apparel and accessories (W1, W2, O1, O4). · Management of supply chain (W3, W4, O1, O3). · More investments in promoting the brand (W1, W2, O1, O4). |
Threats (T) T1 Competition from Nike, Adidas, Champion, New Balance, and Puma T2 Footwear Line T3 Global Market T4 Apparel Prices |
S/T Strategies · Revise company product policy to be more competitive (T1, T4, S1, S2, S4). · Develop strategies to promote new footwear build (T1, T2, S1, S2). · Trendsetter for new product technology (T1, T3, S1, S2, S4). |
W/T Strategies · Promote international growth in the market (W2, W3, W4, T3). · Strategic plan to generate revenue outside of the U.S. (W1, W3, T1, T3). · Improve global procurement of key inputs (W3, W4, T3). |
,
UNDER ARMOUR STRATEGIC AUDIT
Under Armour Strategic Audit
Faculty Advisor:
Student:
July 25, 2019
1
UNDER ARMOUR STRATEGIC AUDIT
Under Armour Strategic Audit
Under Armour is a young American company offering a variety of sportswear, accessories
and shoes. Under Armor was founded in 1996 by Kevin Plank, a former football player at the
University of Maryland.
Thanks to innovative ideas and a non-standard approach to creating clothes, Kevin Planck
managed to create a powerful brand in a relatively short time, with significant opportunities to
expand beyond North America.
Under the Armor brand, the mission is to make all athletes better thanks to passion, design
and a relentless pursuit of innovation (Under Armor, n.p.). To make all athletes better. This analysis
is aimed at studying the internal and external environment of the UA, the company's strategic
directions, its goals and missions, as well as providing strategic recommendations for improving the
economic situation of the company.
At the moment, the company's strategy is to outperform its competitors through actions
aimed at increasing sales and market share through modern and attractive design, better quality and
a wider choice of products. The company is also actively working to distribute its product to
international markets. Under Armor brand is positioned as the highest quality and the best available.
Under Armor pursues a growth strategy aimed at further expanding the company's product range.
The product line strategy is to create a diverse product line. Armor's sports marketing strategy
includes signing equipment agreements with various university and professional sports teams,
sponsoring a range of sports and sporting events, and selling Under Armor products directly to team
leaders and individual athletes. Their retail marketing strategy provides for an increase in retail
space, exclusively for Under Armor products, in the main retail stores.
I have developed several strategic alternatives for the company. They are as follows:
2
UNDER ARMOUR STRATEGIC AUDIT
1. Strategic Alternative #1 – Growth – Concentration: Vertical growth aimed at improving the
product.
2. Strategic Alternative #2 – Growth – Concentration: Horizontal Growth with product distribution
internationally
3. Strategic Alternative #3 – Combination – Stability, Expansion and Retrenchment.
3
UNDER ARMOUR STRATEGIC AUDIT
Table of Contents
Current situation ……………………………………………………………………………….……6
2018 review…………………………..………………………………………………………6
Management ………………………………………………………….……………………..……… 7
Board of directors ……………………………………………….…………………..………7
Committees …………………………………………………….…………………….………7
Audit committee ……………………………………….….…………………………7
Compensation Committee…………………………..….………………….…………7
Corporate Governance Committee………………..…….……………………………8
Finance and Planning Committee…………………….………………………………8
External environment ………………………………………………………………………..………8
Societal Environment……………………………………………………………..…………8
Economic Environment………………………………………………………………………8
Technological Environment………………………………………………….………………9
Summary of External Factors…………………………………………….…………………10
Internal Environment10
Marketing …………………………………………………………………………………10
Finance…………………………………………………………………………………..…11
Research & Development ………………………………………………….………………11
Operations………………………………………………………………………..…………11
Human Resources………………………………………………………..…………………12
Summary of Internal Factors ………………………………….……………………………12
Analysis of Strategic Factors …………………………………………………….…………………13
4
UNDER ARMOUR STRATEGIC AUDIT
Situational Analysis (SWOT) ………………………………………………………………13
Strength ………………………………………………………………..……………13
Weaknesses………………………………………………………….………………13
Opportunities …………………………………………………….…………………13
Threats ……………………………………………………………………………13
Review of Current Mission and Objectives ………………………………………………………14
Strategic Alternatives and Recommend Strategy …………………………………………………15
Strategic Alternatives ………………………………………………………..……………15
Recommended Strategy…………………………………………………………………… 15
References ……………………………………………………………………………….…………17
5
UNDER ARMOUR STRATEGIC AUDIT
Current situation
2018 review
Revenue rose 2 percent to $ 1.4 billion (an increase of 3 percent without currency).
Income from wholesale sales increased by 1 percent to $ 737 million, while income from direct
sales remained at the same rate of $ 577 million, which represents 41 percent of total revenue (UA
Annual report, 2019)..
Revenue in North America decreased by 6 percent to $ 965 million, but international
presence increased by 24 percent to $ 395 million, which represents 28 percent of total revenue. In
the inter-item markets, revenue grew 32 percent in the EMEA region, 35 percent in the Asia-Pacific
region (by 39 percent in neutral currency) and 15 percent in Latin America (11 percent in neutral
currency).
Income from clothing production increased by 2 percent to $ 970 million, with growth in the
train category.
Gross profit increased by 160 basis points to 45.0 percent over the previous year, including
an impact of 2 million (UA Annual report, 2018). Shoe sales revenue decreased by 4 percent to 235
million US dollars, mainly due to a decrease in sales in the channel, not related to prices. Revenues
from accessories fell 2 percent to $ 108 million.
Excluding the restructuring efforts in both periods, the adjusted gross margin increased by
160 basis points to 45.1 percent compared to the previous year, which was mainly due to regional
and channel composition, improved production costs, reduced advertising activity and reduced air
traffic, which partially offset by changes in foreign currency.
Operating loss was $ 10 million. Adjusted operating income was $ 40 million.
Sales, gener
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.