see instruction

Answer 2 questions

What are the fundamental problems or issues of labeling a physical condition a “syndrome” or “disorder” when there is no active disease in the body? What “syndromes” in the past have proven NOT to have been a disease at all? What other physical inclinations lend themselves to this notion of a “syndrome” or “pre” status (such as “pre-diabetic”)?

What is the historical background of ascribing to the theory of compulsory vaccination, forced treatment, and quarantine? In today’s world, do we face like kind threats to the public health that support continuing this policy or have we arrived to a point where this path is no longer necessary? What about the modern phenomenon of a court ordering an ill person with highly contagious infectious disease to take a prescribed course of medication and treatment regardless personal preference or religious belief? Is this progress or a step backward?