see instruction

can you respond to that?

No, I believe that propensity to disease should not be limited to instances, in which there exists a clear physical marker of an identified health problem potentially on the horizon. The reason for this conclusion is because one can be predisposed to a disease without exhibiting any clear physical markers or signs/symptoms of the disease; yet, they will still be deemed to have a disease or illness either way. For example, take the cases of COVID-19 today; some people are symptomatic while others are asymptomatic to the disease. However, when an asymptomatic patient gets a COVID-19 test to prepare for surgery, their test results will be positive, and the doctors will inform the patient that they have the COVID-19 disease even though they were not exhibiting any symptoms. Plus, according to a recent article by an insurance company, Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS), they have announced that they will be covering the expenses related to COVID-19 whether it be testing, prescribed medications, etc. More specifically, they stated, The comprehensive steps taken by the BCBS companies mean that millions of Americans nationwide will have easier access to a range of medical services they may need should they become ill with COVID-19 (Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, para. 2). Note, that according to the BCBS policy, COVID-19 does constitute as an illness whether one is symptomatic or asymptomatic. The overall point is that one can be predisposed to a disease without displaying any physical markers for days up to years.