HUM200 module 3 assignment 1 and 2
Assignment 1: Discussion—Prescriptive and Descriptive Arguments
Descriptions “describe”—they depict the “what is” of a statement. Prescriptions “prescribe”—they express the “what ought to be” of a statement. When approaching controversial or emotionally charged subjects, critical thinkers are mindful of the different roles that facts and values play in people’s judgments and the different roles they play in different kinds of judgments. This assignment will help deepen your understanding of those distinctions.
To see how an issue can be approached using a descriptive or prescriptive argument, review these examples. Descriptive and prescriptive arguments are considered in the lecture pages for Module 3.
Based on your understanding of descriptive and prescriptive arguments, respond to the following:
•Identify a topic of interest for which arguments of different perspectives can be created.
•Construct one original descriptive argument and one original prescriptive argument for the topic you select.
Support your arguments with scholarly references. Be sure to provide citations for your sources as well as citations for a premise you state to be a fact.
Write your initial response in a total of 200–300 words. Apply APA standards to citation of sources.
By the due date assigned, post your response to the Discussion Area. Through the end of the module, review at least two peers’ responses. Each response should be at least 75 words in length. Critically comment on how they have used evidence in different types of arguments. Be sure to address the following:
•Identify the supporting evidence for their arguments.
•Offer an assessment of the strength of the evidence provided in support of the argument. Include a rationale for your statements. You may offer a suggestion for improved supporting evidence.
Grading Criteria
Maximum Points
Quality of initial posting, including fulfillment of assignment
16
Quality of responses to classmates
12
Frequency of responses to classmates
4
Reference to supporting readings and other materials
4
Language and grammar
4
Total:
40
Assignment 2: LASA 1—Analytical Summaries
For this assignment, you will compose two short critical essays explaining and evaluating arguments by other authors. This assignment allows you to analyze an issue from a variety of perspectives and assess arguments for or against the issue. By focusing your attention on how the original authors use evidence and reasoning to construct and support their positions, you can recognize the value of critical thinking in public discourse.
Read the two articles “Shooting in the Dark”, and “Focusing on the How of Violence” and write two separate analytical summaries.
This assignment has two parts.
Part 1—First Article
Write an analytical summary of the article focusing on the article’s main claims. Include the following:
•Provide a brief summary of the argument presented in the article.
•Identify and discuss three ways the author uses evidence to support assertions.
•Analyze how the author signals this usage through elements such as word choices, transitions, or logical connections.
Part 2—Second Article
Write an analytical summary of the article focusing on the article’s main claims. Include the following:
•Provide a brief summary of the argument presented in the article.
•Identify any value-based assertions in the article and how the author supports these value-based conclusions with evidence.
•Discuss how this evidence does or does not demonstrate relevance, consistency, transparency, and speculation.
•Analyze how the author signals the use of these elements through language. For example, word choices, transitions, or logical connections.
Write a 1,000–1,200 word paper in Word format. Apply APA standards to citation of sources. Use the following file naming convention: LastnameFirstInitial_M3_A2.doc.
By the due date assigned, deliver your assignment to the Submissions Area.
Assignment 2 Grading Criteria
Maximum Points
Article One Summary:
20
Summarize the argument presented in the article.
40
Identify and discuss three ways that the author uses evidence to support the primary claims in the article.
20
Article Two Summary:
Summarize the article and identify how the author uses evidence to support assertions.
20
Discuss how the author’s use of evidence does or does not demonstrate relevance, consistency, transparency, and speculation.
40
Analyze how the author uses language to effectively employ these elements (word choice, transition, logical connections).
20
Presentation Components:
Organization (12)
Style (8)
Usage and Mechanics (12)
APA Elements (8)
40
Total:
200
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
