Case Study Assignment: Assessment Tools and Diagnostic Tests in Adults and Children
Assignment 1: Case Study Assignment: Assessment Tools and Diagnostic Tests in Adults and Children
When seeking to identify a patient’s health condition, advanced practice nurses can use a diverse selection of diagnostic tests and assessment tools; however, different factors affect the validity and reliability of the results produced by these tests or tools. Nurses must be aware of these factors in order to select the most appropriate test or tool and to accurately interpret the results.
Not only do these diagnostic tests affect adults, body measurements can provide a general picture of whether a child is receiving adequate nutrition or is at risk for health issues. These data, however, are just one aspect to be considered. Lifestyle, family history, and culture—among other factors—are also relevant. That said, gathering and communicating this information can be a delicate process.
Photo Credit: Getty Images/Hero Images
For this Assignment, you will consider the validity and reliability of different assessment tools and diagnostic tests. You will explore issues such as sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. You will also consider examples of children with various weight issues. You will explore how you could effectively gather information and encourage parents and caregivers to be proactive about their children’s health and weight.
To Prepare
Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider factors that impact the validity and reliability of various assessment tools and diagnostic tests. You also will review examples of pediatric patients and their families as it relates to BMI.
By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to one of the following Assignment options by your Instructor: Adult Assessment Tools or Diagnostic Tests (option 1), or Child Health Case (Option 2). Note: Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignments from your Instructor.
Search the Walden Library and credible sources for resources explaining the tool or test you were assigned. What is its purpose, how is it conducted, and what information does it gather?
Also, as you search the Walden library and credible sources, consider what the literature discusses regarding the validity, reliability, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, ethical dilemmas, and controversies related to the test or tool.
If you are assigned Assignment Option 2 (Child), consider what health issues and risks may be relevant to the child in the health example.
Based on the risks you identified, consider what further information you would need to gain a full understanding of the child’s health. Think about how you could gather this information in a sensitive fashion.
Consider how you could encourage parents or caregivers to be proactive toward the child’s health.
Assignment Option 2: Child Health Case:
Include the following:
An explanation of the health issues and risks that are relevant to the child you were assigned.
Describe additional information you would need in order to further assess his or her weight-related health.
Identify and describe any risks and consider what further information you would need to gain a full understanding of the child’s health. Think about how you could gather this information in a sensitive fashion.
Taking into account the parents’ and caregivers’ potential sensitivities, list at least three specific questions you would ask about the child to gather more information.
Provide at least two strategies you could employ to encourage the parents or caregivers to be proactive about their child’s health and weight. CORE SKILL: understanding that a test result is not a fact — it is a probability revision. This assignment is really a course in test characteristics.
THE FOUR NUMBERS, and what each actually means:
— SENSITIVITY: of the people WITH the disease, what fraction does the test correctly identify? A highly sensitive test has few false negatives, so a NEGATIVE result is good for RULING OUT (SnNOut).
— SPECIFICITY: of the people WITHOUT the disease, what fraction does the test correctly clear? A highly specific test has few false positives, so a POSITIVE result is good for RULING IN (SpPin).
— POSITIVE PREDICTIVE VALUE: given a positive test, what is the probability the patient actually HAS the disease?
— NEGATIVE PREDICTIVE VALUE: given a negative test, what is the probability they don’t?
THE INSIGHT THAT SEPARATES A STRONG PAPER FROM A WEAK ONE: sensitivity and specificity are properties OF THE TEST and are (roughly) stable across populations. PPV AND NPV DEPEND ON PREVALENCE. Screen a low-prevalence population and even an excellent test generates mostly FALSE POSITIVES — this is the mathematics behind mass-screening controversies and it is not intuitive. Work one example numerically: a test with 99% sensitivity and 99% specificity applied to a disease with 0.1% prevalence yields a PPV of roughly 9% — over 90% of positives are false. Show that calculation and you have demonstrated the whole point of the assignment.
RELIABILITY vs. VALIDITY — do not conflate them: RELIABILITY is consistency (test-retest, inter-rater — measured by kappa, internal consistency by Cronbach’s alpha). VALIDITY is accuracy (content, construct, criterion). A test can be perfectly reliable and completely invalid — a consistently miscalibrated scale. Reliability is NECESSARY BUT NOT SUFFICIENT for validity.
ALSO KNOW: likelihood ratios (more useful clinically than PPV/NPV because prevalence-independent), ROC curves and AUC, and the sensitivity/specificity TRADE-OFF as you move the cut-point — which is a VALUES decision, not a statistical one (you accept more false positives when missing the disease is catastrophic).
FACTORS AFFECTING VALIDITY IN PRACTICE: population differences (a tool validated on white adults may perform differently in other groups — pulse oximetry OVERESTIMATES oxygen saturation in patients with darker skin, a well-documented and clinically consequential example worth citing), age (pediatric vs. adult norms), language and literacy of the instrument, spectrum bias, and verification bias.
FOR THE CASE: pick your tools, state their sensitivity/specificity WITH A CITATION, justify why they suit THIS patient’s age/risk/presentation, and — the part that earns the top band — address what a false positive or false negative would COST this specific patient.
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
