This assignment is an analysis of the principles of practice management including conceptional and practical strategies for balancing

C3: Summative Assessment Rubric

Criteria Ratings

Writing Mechanics

Sources

APA formatting

MASTERY Only minimal spelling, grammar, and/or punctation errors present (1-2 errors). The overall sentence structure is well developed throughout, and paragraphs are fully developed with consistent style and clear communication.

PROFICIENT Minor spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors present, and/or sentence structure lacks minor elements of professional writing, and/or paragraphs are consistently developed. (3-4 errors)

DEVELOPING Minimal spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors present, and/or sentence structure lacks elements of professional writing, and/or paragraphs are not consistently developed. (5-7 errors)

EMERGING Multiple spelling grammar and/or punctuation errors present and/or sentence structure does not meet professional writing standards, and/or paragraphs are minimally developed. (more than 7-9 errors)

NOT EVIDENT Significant spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors present, and/or sentence structure does not meet professional writing standards, and/or paragraphs are poorly developed. (10 or more errors

MASTERY The use of sources was consistent throughout the document in all areas to support claims and/or statements in the artifact.

PROFICIENT In most areas, sources were consistently used throughout the submission to support claims and/or statements in the artifact.

DEVELOPING Sources were occasionally used to support some claims and/or statements in the artifact, but statements were not consistently supported with sources throughout.

EMERGING Minimal usage of sources present in the artifact, and/or the overall communication lacked appropriate research support.

NOT EVIDENT Sources were not used to support major statements and/or claims, where needed in the artifact

MASTERY Citations, references, and formatting follow APA style guide, with only one or two minor errors.

PROFICIENT Citations, references, and formatting follow APA style guide, with more than 2 errors, but they are minor.

DEVELOPING APA style is demonstrated with some consistency, but the majority of the citation, references, and/or formatting is not correct.

EMERGING Formatting, citations, and/or references, are attempted, but do not follow APA style guidelines consistently.

NOT EVIDENT Formatting, citations, and references are not included, or do not follow appropriate APA style guide.

Criteria Ratings

Use each of these as a separate concept at the top of your map: practice management, productivity, quality of care.

For each of the three concepts, provide 3 supporting ideas or characteristics. Using arrows or other methods, show how the concepts are related.

The concept map should be easy-to-read, attractive to the eye, and logical

MASTERY Identified the three key concepts at the top of the map. Clearly presented.

PROFICIENT Included three key concepts but not at the top of the map.

DEVELOPING Included 2 key concepts at the top of the map.

EMERGING Included 1 key concept at the top of the map.

NOT EVIDENT Did not include any key concepts at the top of the map.

MASTERY Provided more than 3 or more appropriate supporting details. Used appropriate arrows or other method to show relationships.

PROFICIENT Provided 3 appropriate supporting details. Used appropriate arrows or other method to show relationships.

DEVELOPING Provided 2 appropriate supporting details for each. Arrows or other indicators did not show relationship clearly.

EMERGING Provided 1 appropriate supporting details for each. Arrows or other indicators did not clearly show relationship.

NOT EVIDENT Did not provide supporting details for the 3 main concepts. Arrows or other methods not used to show relationships.

MASTERY Concept map is very easy to read, very attractive to the eye, and is logical.

PROFICIENT Concept map is easy to read, attractive, and mostly logical.

DEVELOPING Concept map is somewhat easy to read, somewhat attractive, and somewhat logical.

EMERGING Concept map is difficult to read, and/or not visually attractive, and/or lacks logic.

NOT EVIDENT Concept map not easy-to- read.