You will analyze the provided case study, identify a specific health issue, and develop a comprehensive nursing practice approach that incorporates relevan

C1: Summative Assessment Rubric

Criteria Ratings

Writing Mechanics

APA formatting

Sources

MASTERY Only minimal spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors are present (1-2 errors). The overall sentence structure is well developed throughout, and paragraphs are fully developed with consistent style and clear

PROFICIENT Minor spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors present, and/or sentence structure lacks minor elements of professional writing, and/or paragraphs are consistently developed. (3-4 errors)

DEVELOPING Minimal spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors present, and/or sentence structure lacks elements of professional writing, and/or paragraphs are not consistently developed. (5-7 errors)

EMERGING Multiple spelling grammar and/or punctuation errors present and/or sentence structure does not meet professional writing standards, and/or paragraphs are minimally developed. (more than 7-9 errors)

NOT EVIDENT Significant spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors present, and/or sentence structure does not meet professional writing standards, and/or paragraphs are poorly developed. (10 or more errors)

MASTERY Citations, references, and formatting follow APA style guide, with only one or two minor errors.

PROFICIENT Citations, references, and formatting follow APA style guide, with more than 2 errors, but they are minor.

DEVELOPING APA style is demonstrated with some consistency, but the majority of the citation, references, and/or formatting is not correct.

EMERGING Formatting, citations, and/or references, are attempted, but do not follow APA style guidelines consistently.

NOT EVIDENT Formatting, citations, and references are not included, or do not follow appropriate APA style guide.

MASTERY The use of sources was consistent throughout the document in all areas to support claims and/or statements in the artifact.

PROFICIENT In most areas, sources were consistently used throughout the submission to support claims and/or statements in the artifact.

DEVELOPING Sources were occasionally used to support some claims and/or statements in the artifact, but statements were not consistently supported with sources throughout.

EMERGING Minimal usage of sources present in the artifact, and/or the overall communication lacked appropriate research support.

NOT EVIDENT Sources were not used to support major statements and/or claims, where needed in the artifact

Criteria Ratings

Case Study Overview

Identification of Health Issue

Theoretical Framework

Development of Nursing Practice Approach

MASTERY Comprehensive summary that captures all key aspects of the case.

PROFICIENT Clear summary with most key aspects identified.

DEVELOPING Adequate summary but misses some important details.

EMERGING Incomplete summary that lacks clarity or key details.

NOT EVIDENT No summary or irrelevant content.

MASTERY Clearly identifies and articulates the primary health issue with significant context and relevance.

PROFICIENT Identifies health issue with some context; relevance is mostly clear.

DEVELOPING Identifies health issue but lacks depth in context and relevance.

EMERGING Vaguely identifies health issue; context is unclear.

NOT EVIDENT Fails to identify the health issue.

MASTERY Thoroughly identifies and describes relevant nursing and interdisciplinary theories, demonstrating strong connections to the case.

PROFICIENT Identifies and describes relevant theories with some connections to the case.

DEVELOPING Identifies theories but lacks depth in description or connections.

EMERGING Vaguely discusses theories with limited relevance.

NOT EVIDENT No relevant theories identified or described.

MASTERY Provides a well- reasoned and innovative practice approach with clear goals, objectives, and evidence-based interventions.

PROFICIENT Presents a clear practice approach with mostly relevant goals and interventions.

DEVELOPING Offers a basic practice approach but lacks innovation or depth.

EMERGING Suggests a vague practice approach with unclear goals and interventions.

NOT EVIDENT No practice approach presented.

Criteria Ratings

Implementation Plan

Evaluation Strategy

MASTERY Comprehensive evaluation strategy with specific, measurable outcomes and clear data collection methods.

PROFICIENT Clear evaluation strategy with relevant outcomes and methods.

DEVELOPING Basic evaluation strategy outlined but lacks specificity.

EMERGING Vague evaluation strategy; unclear outcomes or methods.

NOT EVIDENT No evaluation strategy presented.

MASTERY Report is exceptionally well organized, clear, and free of errors; adheres to APA formatting.

PROFICIENT The report is well organized and clear with minor errors; mostly follows APA formatting.

DEVELOPING The report is adequately organized but may have several errors; some adherence to APA formatting.

EMERGING The report is poorly organized and unclear; numerous errors in APA formatting.

NOT EVIDENT No organization or structure; significant errors.