Identify one inefficiency and/or failure in a selected clinical setting which can result in quality or safety concerns.
PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR INSTRUCTIONS AND RUBRIC
EACH INSTRUCTION MUST BE FOLLOWED AS INDICATED
NO MORE THAN 10% PLAGIO ALLOWED
CHECK YOUR SPELLING AND GRAMMAR IN THE SLIDES AND SPEAKER NOTES
SLIDES MUST BE CONDENSED NEED HAVE PROPER INFORMATION , NOT ALLOWED WITH FEW SENTENCES
14 SLIDES
DUE DATE JANUARY 29, 2025
Module 4 Assignment:
Risk Management and Safety
Guideline and Rubric
Purpose
In clinical healthcare environments, cultures of excellence are committed to the promotion of quality, assurance of safety, and mitigation of risk. The purpose of this assignment is to analyze inefficiency or failure in the clinical environment and the resulting impact on quality and safety at the point of care and organizational levels. Regulatory, accreditation, and best practice guidelines which provide direction are examined, and models for quality improvement and nurse leader competencies to promote compliance are applied to the selected issue.
Assignment Overview
In a 14 slide PowerPoint presentation, address the following elements. Include a minimum of 4 scholarly sources, current within 5 years, to support your work. See rubric for specific, required content criteria within each section of the presentation:
Provide an introduction to the presentation.
Identify one inefficiency and/or failure in a selected clinical setting which can result in quality or safety concerns. You may choose an issue related to your MSN project, or a separate issue. Explain the issue and how it influences quality and safety in the selected clinical setting. Discuss implications of this issue at the point of care and at the organizational level.
Identify one healthcare regulatory guideline, accreditation expectation, or evidence-based standard of practice which provides direction regarding this issue in the selected clinical setting. Explain the expectations described within the regulatory, accreditation, or evidence-based practice guideline or standard of care. Identify and describe three variables in the selected clinical setting which can influence compliance with the stated guideline or standard of care.
Select one quality improvement model and describe how it can be applied to address this issue. Provide an overview of the model, and explain how it can be used to comply with the regulatory, accreditation, or evidence-based practice guideline in the selected clinical setting to promote quality and safety.
Discuss three specific nurse leader competencies which promote a culture of quality and safety. Explain how each competency can be used to mitigate risk and promote quality and safety regarding the issue described.
Provide a conclusion to the presentation.
Assignment Instructions
Abide by the Chamberlain College of Nursing Academic Integrity Policy.
Use Microsoft PowerPoint to create the presentation.
Each slide (excluding title and reference slides) must include detailed speaker notes.
The purpose of the speaker notes is to expand upon the idea and document facts and information about the bulleted information points on the slide.
Formal, scholarly writing style with complete sentence and paragraph structure should be used to create the speaker notes.
Scholarly literature support should be integrated within the speaker notes.
Speaker notes assure that all assignment expectations and key points are covered.
Within the speaker notes, the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure are followed and consistent with formal, scholarly writing as noted in the APA Manual (6th edition).
First person should not be used for this scholarly assignment.
No direct quotes should be included in this assignment
Citation and referencing of sources must be congruent with guidelines noted in the APA Manual (6th edition).
Slides are professional in appearance with visually balanced text, font appropriate for audience reading, succinct bulleted points, and visually appealing contrast between background and font utilized. Correct spelling and appropriate use of graphics/images is evident.
Sources older than five years may not be used without the permission of the class professor.
Please note: If you do not receive a proficient rating in any major content category, you can re-submit your assignment with revisions in those content categories to receive a better grade. You have one additional opportunity to revise after the initial submission in order to make improvements. The initial submission must be a complete paper, rough drafts will not be graded. All revisions must be submitted no later than Sunday of Week 7 at 11:59pm. (You cannot revise your graduate-level writing style for a higher grade in that category)
Assignment Criteria
|
Assessment Criteria |
Points |
% |
Description |
|
Introduction |
20 |
10% |
This section includes: · Importance of risk management and quality assurance within clinical healthcare environments · Identification of the sections of the presentation which will follow · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented |
|
Quality or Safety Issue |
20 |
10% |
This section includes: · Identification of one inefficiency and/or failure in a selected clinical setting which can result in quality or safety concerns. (You may choose an issue related to your MSN project, or a separate issue.) · Explanation of the issue and how it influences quality and safety in the selected clinical setting · Discussion of implications of this issue at the point of care and at the organizational level · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented |
|
Guideline to Mitigate Risk or Assure Quality |
30 |
15% |
This section includes: · Identification of one healthcare regulatory guideline, accreditation expectation, or evidence-based standard of practice which provides direction regarding this issue in the selected clinical setting · Explanation of the expectation described within the regulatory, accreditation, or evidence-based practice guideline or standard of care · Identification and description of three variables in the selected clinical setting which can influence compliance with the stated guideline or standard of care · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented |
|
Application of Quality Improvement Model |
40 |
20% |
This section includes: · Identification and overview of one quality improvement model to address the issue · Detailed explanation of how this model would be applied to comply with the regulatory, accreditation, or evidence-based practice guideline in the selected clinical setting to promote quality and safety · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented |
|
Nurse Leader Competencies to Facilitate Compliance |
30 |
15% |
This section includes: · Identification and discussion of three specific nurse leader competencies which promote a culture of quality and safety · Explanation of how each competency can be used to mitigate risk and promote quality and safety surrounding the issue identified · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented |
|
Conclusion |
20 |
10% |
This section includes: · Synopsis of identified issue and implications for quality and safety in the identified clinical setting · Closing statements regarding the value of nurse leader competencies to facilitate compliance, assure of quality, and mitigate of risk · Specific implications for advanced nursing practice |
|
Graduate-level Writing Style |
20 |
10% |
Graduate-level writing style is included, evidenced by integrating the following standards: · Correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure within the speaker notes · Correct use of spelling and word usage on the slides · Clarity, organization, and logical flow of ideas and information on speaker notes and slides · Alignment between information on slides and speaker notes · APA format (6th edition) for citing and referencing sources · Congruence with APA mechanics of style (abbreviations, capitalization, italics, numbers) · No direct quotes are used within the assignment · First person is not used within the presentation slides or speaker notes |
|
Graduate-level Presentation Style |
20 |
10% |
Professional presentation is created, evidenced by the following: · Slide design includes visually balanced text · Slide design provides contrast of color between background and font used · Succinct, key points are presented on the slides · No lengthy narratives are included on the slides · Font size appropriate for audience viewing (sized 18 or larger) · Use of graphics and/or images is professional and appropriate for the topic |
|
Quality of Literature Support |
It is an expectation that a minimum of 4 scholarly sources, current within 5 years, are integrated within the assignment. If the above expectation is not met, 4 points shall be deducted. |
||
|
Assignment Length Criteria |
It is an expectation that the assignment is a minimum of 14 and a maximum of 16 slides in length (not including the title or reference slides). If the above expectation is not met, 4 points shall be deducted. |
||
|
Total |
200 |
100% |
A quality assignment will meet or exceed the above requirements. |
NR 529: Leadership and Management
within the Clinical Healthcare Environment
NR 529 3/12/19
Grading Rubric
|
Assessment Criteria |
Distinguished (100%) |
Exceeds (92%) |
Proficient (84%) |
Needs Improvement (0) |
|
Introduction |
20 Points |
18 Points |
16 Points |
0 Points |
|
Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by all of the following content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner: · Importance of risk management and quality assurance within clinical healthcare environments · Identification of the sections of the presentation which will follow · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented |
Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial: · Importance of risk management and quality assurance within clinical healthcare environments · Identification of the sections of the presentation which will follow · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented |
Proficient presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a limited or superficial manner in two or more of the content areas: · Importance of risk management and quality assurance within clinical healthcare environments · Identification of the sections of the presentation which will follow · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented |
Presentation of information needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more of the content areas: · Importance of risk management and quality assurance within clinical healthcare environments · Identification of the sections of the presentation which will follow · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented |
|
|
Quality or Safety Issue |
20 Points |
18 Points |
16 Points |
0 Points |
|
Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by all of the following content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner: · Identification of one inefficiency and/or failure in a selected clinical setting which can result in quality or safety concerns. (You may choose an issue related to your MSN project, or a separate issue.) · Explanation of the issue and how it influences quality and safety in the selected clinical setting · Discussion of implications of this issue at the point of care and at the organizational level · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented |
Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial: · Identification of one inefficiency and/or failure in a selected clinical setting which can result in quality or safety concerns. (You may choose an issue related to your MSN project, or a separate issue.) · Explanation of the issue and how it influences quality and safety in the selected clinical setting · Discussion of implications of this issue at the point of care and at the organizational level · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented |
Proficient presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a limited or superficial manner in two or more of the content areas: · Identification of one inefficiency and/or failure in a selected clinical setting which can result in quality or safety concerns. (You may choose an issue related to your MSN project, or a separate issue.) · Explanation of the issue and how it influences quality and safety in the selected clinical setting · Discussion of implications of this issue at the point of care and at the organizational level · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented |
Presentation of information needs improvement as evidenced by content that is missing or unsatisfactory in one or more of the content areas: · Identification of one inefficiency and/or failure in a selected clinical setting which can result in quality or safety concerns. (You may choose an issue related to your MSN project, or a separate issue.) · Explanation of the issue and how it influences quality and safety in the selected clinical setting · Discussion of implications of this issue at the point of care and at the organizational level · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented |
|
|
Guideline to Mitigate Risk or Assure Quality |
30 Points |
27 Points |
25 Points |
0 Points |
|
Distinguished presentation of information evidenced by all of the following content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner: · Identification of one healthcare regulatory guideline, accreditation expectation, or evidence-based standard of practice which provides direction regarding this issue in the selected clinical setting · Explanation of the expectation described within the regulatory, accreditation, or evidence-based practice guideline or standard of care · Identification and description of three variables in the selected clinical setting which can influence compliance with the stated guideline or standard of care · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented |
Presentation of information exceeds expectations evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial: · Identification of one healthcare regulatory guideline, accreditation expectation, or evidence-based standard of practice which provides direction regarding this issue in the selected clinical setting · Explanation of the expectation described within the regulatory, accreditation, or evidence-based practice guideline or standard of care · Identification and description of three variables in the selected clinical setting which can influence compliance with the stated guideline or standard of care · Speaker notes are included for the slide(s) in this section · Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers. Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper? Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials. We write plagiarism Free Content Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties. Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.  All Rights Reserved Terms and Conditions |