For this project you will create a mentoring program that you would like to implement in your department. Make sure to select from the following type

Rubric

Course: CJCB 402 Leadership

Project: Mentoring Proposal Rubric

Learning Outcomes Exceptional Average Developing

1. Produces a well thought-out, professional document

demonstrating rules of composition, and free of grammatical

and spelling errors. Sources are properly cited in APA format.

25 points 15 points 0 points

Student masterfully prepared a

professional document demonstrating

rules of composition, and free of

grammatical and spelling errors. Entire

paper is double-spaced with 12 pt. font.

Correct running head with pagination is

included. Title Page is accurate and

paper length is sufficient to properly

develop written communication with

respect to the main idea, subtopics, etc.

Sources are cited appropriately.

Student has prepared an acceptable

professional document, but minor

composition errors were noted. Adheres

to APA format but lacks 1-2 elements.

Sources are cited but lack proper format.

Student has not prepared a professional

document due to poor demonstration of

composition, poor grammar, or numerous

spelling errors. Does not adhere to APA

formatting.

2. Uses high-quality professional written skills to project a

positive image of the policing organization.

Student masterfully uses high-quality

professional written skills to project a

positive image of the policing

organization. The proposal is clear and

concise with professional presentation.

Student has produced an acceptable

document, but more refinement could be

helpful in projecting a more positive

image.

Student's work does not project a positive

image of the police organization.

3. Proposal includes all required content, including: 1. Design

of the mentoring program; 2. How to attract participants to the

mentoring program; 3. Strategy for connecting mentors and

mentees; 4. Process for guiding the mentoring relationships;

and 5. Identification of the measures of success for the

mentoring program.

Student masterfully incorporates all

required content for the proposal

including design of the mentoring

program, strategy for connecting

mentors and mentees, process for

guiding relationships, and identification

of the measures of success for the

program.

Student includes all required content, but

more refinement could be helpful to the

reader. Proposals are identified yet vague.

Student does not include all required

content in the proposal.

4. Document shows critical thinking associated with identifying

potential risks to the mentoring program and proposing

suitable mitigating actions. Examples of the risks to address,

include:What if mentors can not be found? What if there is a

conflict between a mentor and mentee? What if a mentee is

not particating with the menter? What if the mentor is not

participating?

Student has masterfully identified and

addressed potential risks to the program

by proposing mitigating actions.

Potential conflicts are identified and

addressed.

Student has included potential risks and

associated mitigating actions, but

additional information could have

improved the proposal.

Student is missing either key risks or

mitigating actions, or both, and does not

make the case for launching the mentoring

program.

Proficient (80 or more points, threshold is

80%)

Average (between 70 and 79 points) Developing (less than 70 points)

Overall Score