Personal effectiveness

Submission mode: Turnitin online access 1. General Assessment Guidance • Your summative assessment for this module is made up of this coursework submission which accounts for 100% of the marks • Please note late submissions will not be marked. • You are required to submit all elements of your assessment via Turnitin online access. Only submissions made via the specified mode will be accepted and hard copies or any other digital form of submissions (like via email or pen drive etc.) will not be accepted. • For coursework, the submission word limit is 2500 words. You must comply with the word count guidelines. You may submit LESS than 2500 words but not more. Word Count guidelines can be found on your programme home page and the coursework submission page. • Do not put your name or contact details anywhere on your submission. You should only put your student registration number (SRN) which will ensure your submission is recognised in the marking process. • A total of 100 marks are available for this module assessment, and you are required to achieve minimum 50% to pass this module. • You are required to use only Harvard Referencing System in your submission. Any content which is already published by other author(s) and is not referenced will be considered as a case of plagiarism. You can find further information on Harvard Referencing in the online library on the VLE. You can use the following link to access this information: http://bpp.libguides.com/Home/StudySupport • The University has a strict policy regarding authenticity of assessments. In proven instances of plagiarism or collusion, severe punishment will be imposed on offenders. You are advised to read the rules and regulations regarding plagiarism and collusion in the GARs and MOPP which are available on VLE in the Academic registry section. • You should include a completed copy of the Assignment Cover sheet. Any submission without this completed Assignment Cover sheet may be considered invalid and not marked. 2. Assessment Brief The required submission for this assignment is a 2500 words “Personal Effectiveness Report”. Your report will include reflection on skills for a chosen career, comparison of own skill set with an effective business leader, and analysis of methods for enhancing personal effectiveness. Students are required to complete Three tasks: 1. Reflect on your own skill set in relation to a career goal. 2. Analyse skills of a business leader and compare to your own skill set. 3. Analyse methods of enhancing personal effectiveness. The Learning Outcomes to successfully pass this assessment are: (LO1) Critically evaluate how people learn for professional development. (LO2) Appraise the key skills and behaviours required to be effective in a professional context. (LO3) Demonstrate understanding of a range of methods of supporting personal effectiveness in a professional environment. Your Personal Effectiveness Report should contain the following: Introduction You should begin by an introduction to concept of personal effectiveness. You should also give a brief overview of tasks 1, 2 and 3. TASK 1 1) Using a model of reflective practice, reflect on how you attempt any task at work or university to identify your own skill set. Identify both strengths and weaknesses. 2) Analyse the skills you identified with reference to your choice of career or job. N.B. To support your answer, you should refer to the reflective model by Gibbs or Schön and additional reading resources from this module. You should also include ideas from articles on wider leadership concepts and personal effectiveness from the online library. (This task meets LO2) (Total marks for Task 1: 35% weighting) TASK 2 1) Using the CEO of the Genome Project or Covey’s model, critically analyse the skills of a business leader of your choice. 2) Compare the skills of the business leader with your own. Identify areas of development that will help you improve your personal effectiveness. You should consider a business leader that you would like to follow or that is in a career you would like to succeed in. N.B. You should support your analysis with references to additional reading resources from this module. You should also include ideas from articles in the online library. (This task meets LO1) (Total marks for Task 2: 35% weighting) TASK 3 Based on your response to Task 1 and Task 2, choose a maximum of two areas of development and create a short-term plan to improve these areas. As part of your plan, analyse one method for enhancing your personal effectiveness for each area of development. N.B. You should support your answer with references to additional reading resources from this module. You should also include ideas from articles in the online library. (This task meets LO3) (Total marks for Task 3: 20% weighting) Conclusion You will need to summarise the key points of the assessment tasks. You should end with a concluding statement on the main topic of the report. Structure Your Personal Effectiveness report should contain the following: • BPP assignment cover sheet (including SRN and word count) • Personal Effectiveness report title page • Contents page • Introduction (200 words) • Task 1 (800 words) • Task 2 (800 words) • Task 3 (500 words) • Conclusion (200 words) • References (Correct Harvard Referencing applied throughout, including in-text citation and reference list) • Appendices (if required) • Glossary (optional) *(Total marks for introduction, conclusion and structure: 10 Marks) 3. Marking Guide Assessment task Task 1 (35% weighting, LO2) 0-29% Fail 30-39% 40-49% Low Fail 50-59% Pass 60-69% Merit 70-79% Distinction 80-100% Inadequate reflection with little or no clarity and precision in identifying personal skill set. Fails to use a reflective model effectively. Does not identify both strengths and weaknesses. Weak reflection with limited clarity in identifying personal skill set. Applies a reflective model but with limited depth. Identifies some strengths and weaknesses with limited analysis. Limited reflection with some clarity in identifying personal skill set. Applies a reflective model effectively to some extent. Identifies both strengths and weaknesses but lacks depth in analysis. Satisfactory reflection with explicit identification of personal skill set. Applies a reflective model effectively. Identifies both strengths and weaknesses with a satisfactory level of depth and analysis. Good reflection with clear identification of personal skill set. Applies the reflective model effectively. Identifies both strengths and weaknesses with depth and clarity in analysis. Satisfactory analysis of skills with explicit links to the chosen career or job. References the choice of career effectively with a satisfactory level of depth and analysis. Outstanding reflection with an exceptional and comprehensive understanding of personal skill set. Applies the reflective model with outstanding depth and coherence. Identifies both strengths and weaknesses with exceptional clarity and coherence. Limited analysis of skills with some clarity in the link to the chosen career or job. References the choice of career but lacks depth in analysis. Excellent reflection with a deep and balanced understanding of personal skill set. Applies the reflective model exceptionally well. Identifies both strengths and weaknesses comprehensively with exceptional depth and precision. Inadequate analysis of skills with little or no clarity in the link to the chosen career or job. Fails to reference the choice of career effectively. Weak analysis of skills with limited clarity in the link to the chosen career or job. Makes some reference to the choice of career but with limited depth. Good analysis of skills with clear and coherent links to the chosen career or job. References the choice of career effectively with depth and clarity in analysis. Excellent analysis of skills with a thorough understanding of their relevance to the chosen career or job. References the choice of career comprehensively with exceptional depth and precision in analysis. Outstanding analysis of skills with an exceptional and comprehensive understanding of their direct application to the chosen career or job. References the choice of career with exceptional clarity and coherence in analysis. Task 2 (35% weighting, LO1) Inadequate analysis of the business leader’s skills with little or no clarity in the application of the CEO Genome Project or Covey’s model. Fails to critically evaluate skills effectively. Inadequate comparison of skills with limited clarity in the link to personal development. Fails to identify areas of development effectively. Assessment task Task 3 (20% weighting, LO3) Weak analysis of the business leader’s skills with limited clarity in the application of the CEO Genome Project or Covey’s model. Makes some attempts at critical evaluation but lacks depth. Weak comparison of skills with limited clarity in the link to personal development. Identifies some areas of development but lacks depth. Limited analysis of the business leader’s skills with some clarity in the application of the CEO Genome Project or Covey’s model. Attempts to critically evaluate skills but with limited depth and analysis. Satisfactory analysis of the business leader’s skills with explicit application of the CEO Genome Project or Covey’s model. Critically evaluates skills with a satisfactory level of depth and analysis. Good analysis of the business leader’s skills with clear and coherent application of the CEO Genome Project or Covey’s model. Critically evaluates skills with depth and clarity in analysis. Limited comparison of skills with some clarity in the link to personal development. Identifies areas of development but lacks depth in analysis. Satisfactory comparison of skills with explicit links to personal development. Identifies areas of development with a satisfactory level of depth and analysis. Good comparison of skills with clear and coherent links to personal development. Identifies areas of development with depth and clarity in analysis. Excellent analysis of the business leader’s skills with a thorough understanding of the application of the CEO Genome Project or Covey’s model. Critically evaluates skills comprehensively with exceptional depth and precision. Outstanding analysis of the business leader’s skills with an exceptional and comprehensive understanding of the application of the CEO Genome Project or Covey’s model. Critically evaluates skills with exceptional clarity and coherence. Excellent comparison of skills with a thorough understanding of their relevance to personal development. Identifies areas of development comprehensively with exceptional depth and precision in analysis. Outstanding comparison of skills with an exceptional and comprehensive understanding of their direct application to personal development. Identifies areas of development with exceptional clarity and coherence in analysis. 0-29% Fail 30-39% 40-49% Low Fail 50-59% Pass 60-69% Merit 70-79% Distinction 80-100% Inadequate identification of areas of development with little or no relevance to the previous tasks. Fails to create a shortterm plan effectively. Fails to identify suitable methods effectively. Weak identification of areas of development with limited relevance to the previous tasks. Creates a short-term plan with some gaps and limitations. Identifies and analyses some methods but lacks depth and relevance. Limited identification of areas of development with relevance to the previous tasks. Creates a short-term plan with some elements but lacks depth and specificity. Identifies and analyses some methods but has limited depth and relevance. Satisfactory identification of areas of development with explicit relevance to the previous tasks. Creates a short-term plan with a satisfactory level of depth and specificity. Identifies and analyses methods with a satisfactory level of depth and relevance. Good identification of areas of development with clear and coherent relevance to the previous tasks. Creates a shortterm plan with depth and clarity in objectives and actions. Identifies and analyses methods with good depth and clarity in analysis. Excellent identification of areas of development with a thorough understanding of their relevance to the previous tasks. Creates a comprehensive short-term plan with exceptional depth, precision, and feasibility. Comprehensively identifies and analyses methods with excellent depth and precision. Outstanding identification of areas of development with an exceptional and comprehensive understanding of their direct application to the previous tasks. Creates a short-term plan with exceptional clarity, coherence, feasibility, and innovation. Identifies and analyses methods with exceptional clarity, coherence, feasibility, and innovation. Presentation (10% weighting) Inadequate references with inconsistencies, errors or omissions. Limited structure and expression. Weak references but may contain inconsistencies, errors or omissions. Limited structure and expression. Limited references with errors or inconsistencies. Limited structure and expression. Satisfactory with full and appropriate references. Satisfactory structured layout and mainly accurate expression. Good with precise, full and appropriate references. Well-structured layout and professional and accurate expression. Excellent with precise, full and appropriate references. Excellent structured layout and professional and accurate expression. Outstanding with precise, full and appropriate references. Outstanding structured layout and professional and accurate expression.

Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers

Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.

Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS

Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?

Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.

We write plagiarism Free Content

Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.

Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.