Psychology Question

Homework Therapy Tutoring week 5 assignment due (may 12th 2024) Yacura Clark To: Homework Therapy Tutoring Fri, May 3 at 2:59 PM Overview This 5–7 page paper focuses on challenging a flawed source of information about biopsychology using evidence from credible and scholarly sources. The easy availability of poor quality, outdated, or inaccurate information about how our brains work can make it difficult to find trustworthy information. The objective of this assignment is to practice finding and using credible evidence to counter flawed sources. Preparation Choose one of the following controversial statements: Obesity is caused by lack of willpower. There are large differences between men and women’s cognitive ability. Only women should compete in women’s sports. Topic of your choice related to the content in the chapters on Motivation, Sex, Gender, or Emotion. Find one flawed source of information on the internet. To find a flawed source, look for one with a substantial number of errors: Read what the textbook says about the controversial statement. Use the controversial statement mentioned above and use it as your search word/phrase. If you don’t see a flawed source on the first page of results, skip to the 3rd page of results or further. Look for sources that are not accurate based on the information in your textbook. Tips for finding flawed sources, Scroll through your social media feeds. Scroll through your results and look for sources that are not: .gov websites. News or press websites. Then, find three peer-reviewed journal articles in the Capella library focused on the actions of the brain and body that underlie your topic. Instructions In your paper: Describe one other field (such as biology or medical sciences) that studies your topic. Compare this field to psychology. Contrast this field to psychology. For your topic, what is the benefit of the two fields working together? Summarize your flawed source, including any evidence provided. Provide evidence from your 3 peer-reviewed journal articles. For each source: Discuss the methods, participants, and results. Explain the reliability, validity, and generalizability of the sources. Discuss whether the research is ethically based on the 5 APA ethical principles of psychologists. Refer to the specific principles and cite the Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of ConductLinks to an external site.. Relate the actions of the mind and body to psychological and physical health. Describe the actions of brain and body involved. Connect these biological actions to your topic. Describe one of the psychological or behavioral theories that explain your topic. Describe the value and limitation of using theories to explain behavioral phenomena. Construct your own explanation to explain the cause of your topic. Explain your rationale. Refer back to evidence already presented in your paper. Headings Use headers to organize your paper. Recommended headers: Flawed source (Level 1) Peer-reviewed sources (Level 1) Source 1 (Level 2) Source 2 (Level 2) Source 3 (Level 2) Biological Mechanisms (Level 1) Theories (Level 1) Conclusion (Level 1) Additional Requirements Written communication: Written communication is in professional style with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics. Resources: Use a minimum of six sources: your flawed source, your textbook, the Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct Links to an external site. and three peer-reviewed journal articles. APA formatting: References and citations are formatted according to APA style and formatting. Refer to Academic WriterLinks to an external site. for guidance in using proper APA style. See the Evidence and APALinks to an external site. section of the Writing Center for instructions on accessing and using Academic Writer and APA Paper Template [DOCX] Download APA Paper Template [DOCX]. Length: 5–7 double-spaced, typed pages. Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12-point. Competencies Measured By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and rubric criteria: Competency 1: Relate the actions of the mind and body to psychological and physical health. Explain the benefits of interdisciplinary collaboration. Relate the actions of the mind and body to psychological and physical health. Competency 2: Construct alternative explanations based on perceived flaws in behavioral claims. Describe a psychological theory. Construct an alternative explanation based on perceived flaws in behavioral claims. Competency 3: Examine psychological research from the standpoint of adherence to the APA Ethics Code in psychological research involving human or nonhuman research participants. Explain psychological research from the standpoint of adherence to the APA Ethics Code in psychological research. Competency 4: Expose flawed sources of information. Choose a flawed source of information. Explain peer-reviewed evidence. Competency 5: Write for purpose in a well organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences. Use headers to organize paper. Use APA style formatting for citations and reference list with only minor errors. Address assignment purpose in a well-organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences. View Rubric Week 5 Assignment: That Can’t Be Correct Week 5 Assignment: That Can’t Be Correct Criteria Ratings 15 to >12.75 pts DISTINGUISHED Explains the benefits of interdisciplinary collaboration by comparing and Pts contrasting two academic disciplines. Explain the benefits of interdisciplinary collaboration. 12.75 to >10.5 pts PROFICIENT Explains the benefits of interdisciplinary collaboration. / 15 pts 10.5 to >0 pts BASIC Describes but does not explain the benefits of interdisciplinary collaboration. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not explain the benefits of interdisciplinary collaboration. 15 to >12.75 pts DISTINGUISHED Chooses a flawed source of information and provides a summary. 12.75 to >10.5 pts PROFICIENT Choose a flawed source of information. Chooses a flawed source of information. 10.5 to >0 pts BASIC / 15 pts Chooses a source that is not flawed. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not choose a flawed source of information. 15 to >12.75 pts DISTINGUISHED Explains peer-reviewed evidence including reliability, validity, and generalizability. 12.75 to >10.5 pts PROFICIENT Explain peer-reviewed evidence. Explains peer-reviewed evidence. 10.5 to >0 pts BASIC / 15 pts Explains peer-reviewed evidence but does not discuss research method or participants. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not explain peer-reviewed evidence. 15 to >12.75 pts DISTINGUISHED Explains psychological research from the standpoint of adherence to the APA Ethics Code in psychological research using examples. 12.75 to >10.5 pts PROFICIENT Explain psychological research from the standpoint of adherence to the APA Ethics Code in psychological research. Explains psychological research from the standpoint of adherence to the APA Ethics Code in psychological research. 10.5 to >0 pts BASIC Describes ethical principles but does not explain psychological research from the standpoint of adherence to the APA Ethics Code in psychological research. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE / 15 pts Does not describe or explain psychological research from the standpoint of adherence to the APA Ethics Code in psychological research. 15 to >12.75 pts DISTINGUISHED Relates the actions of the mind and body to psychological and physical health using examples. 12.75 to >10.5 pts PROFICIENT Relate the actions of the mind and body to psychological and physical health. Relates the actions of the mind and body to psychological and physical health. 10.5 to >0 pts BASIC / 15 pts Describes but does not relate the actions of the mind and body to psychological and physical health. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not describe or relate the actions of the mind and body to psychological and physical health. 15 to >12.75 pts DISTINGUISHED Describes a psychological theory and connects it to the topic. 12.75 to >10.5 pts PROFICIENT Describe a psychological theory. Describes a psychological theory. 10.5 to >0 pts BASIC / 15 pts Identifies but does not describe a psychological theory. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not identify or describe a psychological theory. 15 to >12.75 pts DISTINGUISHED Constructs an alternative explanation based on perceived flaws in behavioral claims that is supported by evidence. 12.75 to >10.5 pts PROFICIENT Construct an alternative explanation based on perceived flaws in behavioral claims. Constructs an alternative explanation based on perceived flaws in behavioral claims. 10.5 to >0 pts BASIC Constructs an alternative explanation that is not based on perceived flaws in behavioral claims. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not construct an alternative explanation based on perceived flaws in behavioral claims. 15 to >12.75 pts DISTINGUISHED Uses APA style headers to organize paper. 12.75 to >10.5 pts / 15 pts PROFICIENT Use headers to organize paper. Uses headers to organize paper. 10.5 to >0 pts BASIC / 15 pts Uses one to two headers to organize paper. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not use headers to organize paper. 15 to >12.75 pts DISTINGUISHED Uses APA style formatting for citations with no errors and a reference list with no more than minor errors. 12.75 to >10.5 pts PROFICIENT Use APA style formatting for citations and reference list with only minor errors. Uses APA style formatting for citations and reference list with only minor errors. / 15 pts 10.5 to >0 pts BASIC Uses APA style formatting for citations and reference list but has major errors. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not use citations or have a reference list. 15 to >12.75 pts DISTINGUISHED Presents a focused purpose through strong organizational skills. Presents evidence through strong paraphrasing/summarizing and appropriate tone and sentence structure. Address assignment purpose in a wellorganized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences. 12.75 to >10.5 pts PROFICIENT Addresses assignment purpose in a well-organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences. 10.5 to >0 pts BASIC Addresses the assignment purpose with minimal issues related to evidence, tone, and sentence structure. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not respond to the assignment prompt and/or does not organize text appropriately, uses inappropriate tone, or does not include structurally sound sentences. Total Points: 0 / 15 pts

Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers

Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.

Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS

Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?

Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.

We write plagiarism Free Content

Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.

Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.