Assignment 1: Applying Current Literature to Clinical Practice Li

Assignment 1: Applying Current Literature to Clinical Practice Literature in psychotherapy differs from other areas of clinical practice. Generally, there are no clinical trials in psychotherapy because it is often neither appropriate nor ethical to have controls in psychotherapy research. This sometimes makes it more difficult to translate research findings into practice. In your role, however, you must be able to synthesize current literature and apply it to your own clients. For this Assignment, you begin practicing this skill by examining current literature on psychodynamic therapy and considering how it might translate into your own clinical practice. To prepare: Review this weeks Learning Resources and reflect on the insights they provide. Select one of the psychodynamic therapy articles from the Learning Resources to evaluate for this Assignment. Note: In nursing practice, it is not uncommon to review current literature and share findings with your colleagues. Approach this Assignment as though you were presenting the information to your colleagues. The Assignment In a 7- to 10-slide PowerPoint presentation, address the following: Provide an overview of the article you selected. What population is under consideration? What was the specific intervention that was used? Is this a new intervention or one that was already used? What were the authors claims? Explain the findings/outcomes of the study in the article. Include whether this will translate into practice with your own clients. If so, how? If not, why? Explain whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings/outcomes presented in the article. Support your position with evidence-based literature. Note:The presentation should be 710 slides, not including the title and reference slides. Include presenter notes (no more than ½ page per slide) and use tables and/or diagrams.Be sure to support your work with specific citations from the article you selected. Support your approach with evidence-based literature. Check for plagiarism Required Readings American Nurses Association. (2014).Psychiatric-mental health nursing: Scope and standards of practice (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Author. · Standard 2 Diagnosis? (pages 46-47) Wheeler, K. (Ed.). (2014).Psychotherapy for the advanced practice psychiatric nurse: A how-to guide for evidence-based practice(2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company. · Chapter 5, Supportive and Psychodynamic Psychotherapy? (pp. 225238 and pp. 245258) American Psychiatric Association. (2013).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders(5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. Young, J. M., & Solomon, M. J. (2009). How to critically appraise an article. Nature Clinical Practice.Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 6(2), 8291. How to Critically Appraise an Article by Young, J.; Solomon, M., in Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Vol. 6/Issue 2. Copyright 2009 by Nature Publishing Group. Reprinted by permission of Nature Publishing Group via the Copyright Clearance Center. Select one of the following articles on psychodynamic therapy to evaluate in your Assignment: Aznar-Martinez, B., Perez-Testor, C., Davins, M., & Aramburu, I. (2016). Couple psychoanalytic psychotherapy as the treatment of choice: Indications, challenges, and benefits.Psychoanalytic Psychology, 33(1), 120. doi:10.1037/a0038503 Karbelnig, A. M. (2016). The analyst is present?: Viewing the psychoanalytic process as performance art.Psychoanalytic Psychology, 33(supplement 1), S153S172. doi:10.1037/a0037332 LaMothe, R. (2015). A future project of psychoanalytic psychotherapy: Revisiting the debate between classical/commitment and analytic therapies.Psychoanalytic Psychology, 32(2), 334351. doi:10.1037/a0035982 Migone, P. (2013). Psychoanalysis on the Internet: A discussion of its theoretical implications for both online and offline therapeutic technique.Psychoanalytic Psychology, 30(2), 281299. doi:10.1037/a0031507 Tummala-Narra, P. (2013). Psychoanalytic applications in a diverse society.Psychoanalytic Psychology, 30(3), 471487. doi:10.1037/a0031375 Note:You will access all of these articles from the Walden Library databases. Required Media Laureate Education (Producer). (2015c).The importance of a therapeutic relationship: Mary Boyle[Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author. Provided courtesy of the Laureate International Network of Universities. Note:The approximate length of this media piece is 2 minutes. Rubric Detail SelectGrid VieworList Viewto change the rubrics layout. Content Name:NURS_6640_Week3_Assignment1_Rubric ·Grid View ·List View Excellent Good Fair Poor Quality of Work Submitted: The extent of which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking. Points Range: 27 (27%) 30 (30%) Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth abouteachof the assignment topics. Points Range: 24 (24%) 26 (26%) Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth abouteachof the assignment topics. Points Range: 21 (21%) 23 (23%) Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed. Points Range: 0 (0%) 20 (20%) Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed. Quality of Work Submitted: The purpose of the paper is clear. Points Range: 5 (5%) 5 (5%) A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria. Points Range: 4 (4%) 4 (4%) Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) 3.5 (3.5%) Purpose of the assignment is vague or off topic. Points Range: 0 (0%) 3 (3%) No purpose statement was provided. Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the students ability to: Understand and interpret the assignments key concepts. Points Range: 9 (9%) 10 (10%) Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts. Points Range: 8 (8%) 8 (8%) Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts. Points Range: 7 (7%) 7 (7%) Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts. Points Range: 0 (0%) 6 (6%) Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics. Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the students ability to: Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources. Points Range: 18 (18%) 20 (20%) Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 2-3 course resources to suppport point of view. Points Range: 16 (16%) 17 (17%) Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view. Points Range: 14 (14%) 15 (15%) Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major points and point of view. Points Range: 0 (0%) 13 (13%) Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resoruce to support major points and point of view. Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extent to which the work reflects the students ability to: Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections. Points Range: 18 (18%) 20 (20%) Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Applies meaning to the field of advanced nursing practice. Points Range: 16 (16%) 17 (17%) Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize. Points Range: 14 (14%) 15 (15%) Identifies but does not interpret or apply concepts, and/or strategies correctly; ideas unclear and/or underdeveloped. Points Range: 0 (0%) 13 (13%) Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies. Written Expression and Formatting Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focusedneither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. Points Range: 5 (5%) 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity Points Range: 4 (4%) 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time. Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. Points Range: 0 (0%) 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time. Written Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Points Range: 5 (5%) 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Points Range: 4 (4%) 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the readers understanding. Written Expression and Formatting The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing,margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. Points Range: 5 (5%) 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors. Points Range: 4 (4%) 4 (4%) Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. Points Range: 0 (0%) 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Total Points: 100 Name:NURS_6640_Week3_Assignment1_Rubric

Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers

Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.

Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS

Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?

Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.

We write plagiarism Free Content

Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.

Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.