Write a paper regarding the title and the Abstract attached? 2- APA style? 3- Follow the SQUIRE guidance and fields 3- Add references?Introduction.docxSQUIRE2.0ChecklistforReviewe
1- Write a paper regarding the title and the Abstract attached
2- APA style
3- Follow the SQUIRE guidance and fields
3- Add references
Improvement in Return to ED Safety Measures in KAMC-NGHA)
Introduction:
Emergency department return cases as critical/dead patients is a concern to be measured and valued for any healthcare organization.
Objectives:
This study aimed to reduce the return of critical/dead adult patients to ER within 72 hours in King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC) at National Guard Health Affairs (NGHA) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) and identify the inappropriate discharge of the first visit.
Methodology:
Results:
The events were reduced from 0.13 % in 2021 to 0.08% in 2022-2023.
Conclusion: Continuous monitoring is required by applying daily trigger tools. Analyzing and escalating the return patients to ED in KAMC-NGHA.
Keywords: ED, Emergency Department, HIS, ER, KAMC, NGHA, KSA.
Figure 1: ED Return as Critical/Dead
image1.png
,
Revised Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE 2.0)
September 15, 2015
Text Section and Item
Name Section or Item Description
Notes to authors
The SQUIRE guidelines provide a framework for
reporting new knowledge about how to improve
healthcare
The SQUIRE guidelines are intended for reports that
describe system level work to improve the quality,
safety, and value of healthcare, and used methods to
establish that observed outcomes were due to the
intervention(s).
A range of approaches exists for improving
healthcare. SQUIRE may be adapted for reporting
any of these.
Authors should consider every SQUIRE item, but it
may be inappropriate or unnecessary to include
every SQUIRE element in a particular manuscript.
The SQUIRE Glossary contains definitions of many
of the key words in SQUIRE.
The Explanation and Elaboration document provides
specific examples of well-written SQUIRE items,
and an in-depth explanation of each item.
Please cite SQUIRE when it is used to write a
manuscript.
As you review the
manuscript, place a
checkmark in this
column for each
SQUIRE item that is
appropriately
addressed in the
manuscript.
Remember that not
every item is
necessary in every
manuscript.
Title and Abstract
1. Title
Indicate that the manuscript concerns an initiative to
improve healthcare (broadly defined to include the quality,
safety, effectiveness, patient-centeredness, timeliness, cost,
efficiency, and equity of healthcare)
2. Abstract
a. Provide adequate information to aid in searching and
indexing
b. Summarize all key information from various sections of
the text using the abstract format of the intended
publication or a structured summary such as:
background, local problem, methods, interventions,
results, conclusions
Introduction Why did you start?
3. Problem
Description Nature and significance of the local problem
4. Available
knowledge
Summary of what is currently known about the problem,
including relevant previous studies
5. Rationale
Informal or formal frameworks, models, concepts, and/or
theories used to explain the problem, any reasons or
assumptions that were used to develop the intervention(s),
and reasons why the intervention(s) was expected to work
6. Specific aims Purpose of the project and of this report
Methods What did you do?
7. Context Contextual elements considered important at the outset of
introducing the intervention(s)
8. Intervention(s)
a. Description of the intervention(s) in sufficient detail that
others could reproduce it
b. Specifics of the team involved in the work
9. Study of the
Intervention(s)
a. Approach chosen for assessing the impact of the
intervention(s)
b. Approach used to establish whether the observed
outcomes were due to the intervention(s)
10. Measures
a. Measures chosen for studying processes and outcomes
of the intervention(s), including rationale for choosing
them, their operational definitions, and their validity and
reliability
b. Description of the approach to the ongoing assessment
of contextual elements that contributed to the success,
failure, efficiency, and cost
c. Methods employed for assessing completeness and
accuracy of data
11. Analysis
a. Qualitative and quantitative methods used to draw
inferences from the data
b. Methods for understanding variation within the data,
including the effects of time as a variable
12. Ethical
Considerations
Ethical aspects of implementing and studying the
intervention(s) and how they were addressed, including, but
not limited to, formal ethics review and potential conflict(s)
of interest
Results What did you find?
13. Results
a. Initial steps of the intervention(s) and their evolution
over time (e.g., time-line diagram, flow chart, or table),
including modifications made to the intervention during
the project
b. Details of the process measures and outcome
c. Contextual elements that interacted with the
intervention(s)
d. Observed associations between outcomes, interventions,
and relevant contextual elements
e. Unintended consequences such as unexpected benefits,
problems, failures, or costs associated with the
intervention(s).
f. Details about missing data
Discussion What does it mean?
14. Summary
a. Key findings, including relevance to the rationale and
specific aims
b. Particular strengths of the project
15. Interpretation
a. Nature of the association between the intervention(s)
and the outcomes
b. Comparison of results with findings from other
publications
c. Impact of the project on people and systems
d. Reasons for any differences between observed and
anticipated outcomes, including the influence of context
e. Costs and strategic trade-offs, including opportunity
costs
16. Limitations
a. Limits to the generalizability of the work
b. Factors that might have limited internal validity such as
confounding, bias, or imprecision in the design,
methods, measurement, or analysis
c. Efforts made to minimize and adjust for limitations
17. Conclusions
a. Usefulness of the work
b. Sustainability
c. Potential for spread to other contexts
d. Implications for practice and for further study in the
field
e. Suggested next steps
Other information
18. Funding
Sources of funding that supported this work. Role, if any, of
the funding organization in the design, implementation,
interpretation, and reporting
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.