The video “Mother Goes to Jail for Parental Alienation” presents an ethical dilemma involving the conflict between the professional values of protecting children and preserving family integrity.
The video “Mother Goes to Jail for Parental Alienation” presents an ethical dilemma involving the conflict between the professional values of protecting children and preserving family integrity. good Blessing; this is perfect. Professional values are fundamental beliefs or principles that guide the behavior and decision-making of individuals in a particular profession. These values are vital for the practice of the profession. In the given scenario, the professional values in conflict are protecting the children and preserving family integrity. Protecting the children involves ensuring their safety, well-being, and development, which may require intervening or acting when there is a risk or evidence of harm.
On the other hand, preserving family integrity involves respecting and supporting the family unit and maintaining positive relationships between family members. The ethical dilemma arises when these two values conflict, as in the case of a bipolar mother who has been open about her condition and is seeking to rebuild her relationship with her two daughters. The mother has been honest about her struggles and has shown a genuine desire to be involved in her daughters’ lives, but the daughters have expressed feeling alienated and unsafe due to their mother’s condition. The conflict between these values arises when considering the best course of action for the mother and daughters. On one hand, protecting the children may involve limiting or restricting contact with the mother to ensure their safety and well-being. On the other hand, preserving family integrity may include supporting the mother’s efforts to rebuild her relationship with her daughters and respecting the family’s dynamics. very well articulated. I hope everyone will read this. The practice issue of the mother’s mental health must also be considered when we are assessing the case and the extent to which this will influence the outcome.
What are the moral principles, according to Beauchamp & Childress, that would be applicable?
According to Beauchamp and Childress (2019), the moral principles that apply to this case are beneficence and non-maleficence. Beneficence emphasizes the need to prioritize the well-being and best interests of the children involved. Non-maleficence, which includes considering the impact of punishment on the mother’s overall well-being, and justice, which ensures equity and fairness in treating all parties involved, are also essential principles to consider. good
According to Mattison’s model, how do you separate practice considerations from ethical components?
According to Mattison’s (2000) model, it is possible to distinguish between practice considerations and ethical components by focusing on the mother’s behavior and the broader context and societal implications of the latter. In this scenario, practice considerations would center on the mother’s mental health and its effects on her ability to provide care for her children. At the same time, ethical components would involve taking into account the broader societal consequences of incarcerating a mother with a mental illness and the potential impact this could have on her children. good. You must weight the benefits of incarceration as having the potential to add to the trauma already experienced by the children.
Make an informed decision to answer this question: Would a deontological or utilitarian theoretical framework apply to this case? (Use the literature to support your position on both values. You are not expected to make a judgment at this time, just a presentation of the facts.)
The Utilitarian frameworks are based on maximizing overall happiness or well-being for the most significant number of people. is this a significant number of people? Utilitarian approaches are typically identifying the consequences for the ‘greater good’/larger society, not one family system. From a utilitarian perspective, the potential harm to the children and the importance of maintaining family unity may outweigh the mother’s autonomy and individual rights. Essentially, this ethical approach emphasizes the greater good and the benefits that society can achieve rather than solely focusing on personal rights and freedoms. In this case, prioritizing the well-being of the children and the family as a whole is more important than the mother’s autonomy. Look at the deontological theory more closely; it supports what is morally right or just when navigating an ethical dilemma; it is more interested in the rightness of the act than the outcome. What is in the best interests of the people who are affected?
Please provide any ‘moral traces’ that you encountered and/or conflicts of professional versus personal value.
A moral trace I encountered is the competing interests of accountability and justice. There is a need to hold people accountable for what they do, especially in violation of parental rights, and consideration for rehabilitation or mercy, considering the condition of the mother. i concur.(Blessing
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
