Health & Medical Question
Spring 2024 PHI 237 Medical Ethics Paper 2 Topic Technical Guidelines: • 900 words minimum. Target maximum 1250 words, but there’s a little wiggle room. • Include a cover sheet with the following information • A title (this can be “Paper #2” or something more descriptive) • The word count • Times New Roman 12-point font, double-spaced, 1-inch margins all around. • Your paper should be checked carefully for spelling and grammar errors. Spelling and grammar errors could very easily affect your score on the “clarity” component. Bibliographic Guidelines: • I don’t care what citation format you use, just make sure you’re consistent • If citing a reading from the class, you can just cite author and page number (either in a parenthetical or in a footnote), and you don’t need to include it in a bibliography • If you have no outside sources, you do not need a bibliography. If you use any sources from outside the class readings, then you must have a bibliography with entries that give adequate information for the paper reader to find the source if they wish. Topic Using the material from Gazzaniga and Shoemaker, take a position on the earliest stage of development at which a biologically human organism plausibly has intrinsic moral value. If you argue that this earliest point is conception, explain two arguments raising problems for that view and offer replies to those arguments. If you argue for a point later than conception, explain one argument that supports an earlier stage and one argument that supports a later stage, and for each of these arguments, offer a reply. Further Explanation If your position is that a biologically human organism gains intrinsic moral value at any point later than conception, think of the paper as a conversation between you and two friends. You tell your friends at what point you think there is intrinsic moral value and why. Next, one of your friends disagrees, claiming that there is intrinsic moral value at some point earlier than what you said. Have them give a reason in support of their position in favor of yours. Then, you reply to their objection, explaining why the time you asserted is a more plausible answer than the time they defended. Next, your other friend chimes in, claiming that your proposed time is actually too early, and there is not intrinsic moral value until later in development. Again, have them offer a reason why you’re wrong and they’re right, and then you reply with why they are mistaken and your answer is superior. If your position is that a biologically human organism gains intrinsic moral value at conception, instead of imagining arguments for earlier and later times, give two objections to your view – that is, explain why there seem to be problems with saying that there is intrinsic moral value at the moment of conception – then replyto each of those objections, showing why they either don’t really make a problem or the problem isn’t that big of a deal. In terms of organization, you will probably want to give the first objection and your reply to it, and then give the second objection and your reply to it. Rubric: Your grade will be based on 4 criteria: clarity, accuracy, relevance, and organization. For each criterion, you will get a score between 1 and 4. Those scores will then be added together and multiplied by 5, giving a possible range of scores between 20 and 80. You automatically get 20 points just for handing in the paper, so when your earned points are added in, your range of possible scores is 40 to 100. The TAs can give scores in quarter-point increments, so it is possible, for instance, to get a 2.25 or a 3.75 for one of the components, but you would not get a 3.3 or a 1.9. Put another way: a = clarity score b = accuracy score c = relevance score d = organization score Your total score will be 20 + (5*[a+b+c+d]) Below are guidelines for what counts as a given score on each criterion. Clarity: 1 – Consistently difficult or impossible to tell what the writer means. Claims are frequently vague or ambiguous, and concepts are used improperly. Grammatical mistakes may hinder intelligibility. 2 – Frequently difficult, sometimes even impossible, to tell what the writer means. Claims are repeatedly vague or ambiguous, and some concepts are used improperly. Grammatical mistakes may hinder intelligibility. 3 – Usually clear writing, but occasionally difficult to tell what writer means. In a few cases, claims are vague or ambiguous, or a concept is misused. Grammar is consistently good. 4 – Writing is consistently clear and writer’s meaning is clear. Claims are rarely if ever vague or ambiguous, and concepts are used properly. Grammar mistakes, if there are any, do not get in the way of understanding the paper’s claims Accuracy: 1 – Factual claims are regularly incorrect and reconstructions of arguments have many errors. 2 – Factual claims are incorrect with some frequency, and reconstructions of arguments often have one or more significant errors. 3 – Most factual claims are accurate, and reconstruction of arguments have no serious errors. 4 – Factual claims are reliably correct, having few if any incorrect statements. Arguments are consistently reconstructed correctly Relevance: 1 – Essay includes a lot of material that is not relevant to the prompt and/or lacks a lot of material that is essential to answering the prompt adequately 2 – Essay repeatedly includes irrelevant material and/or lacks important material 3 – Essay has all or almost all needed material but contains some irrelevant information as well. 4 – Essay is focused on the relevant material, includes everything needed to answer the prompt and does not go off-course with irrelevant things. Organization: 1 – There is effectively no discernable organization in the paper. Claims are introduced in no orderly way, and the paper does not build on itself to any serious degree 2 – There is not much organization to the paper. In a few short stretches, the paper builds on itself or rationally expands upon ideas introduced, but these are the exceptions, not the rule 3 – The paper mostly succeeds in creating an organized structure where ideas are introduced and then expanded upon and the paper builds on itself well. 4 – The paper consistently offers an organized structure and builds upon itself in a way that makes it easy to follow the author’s line of reasoning
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
