Screening SBIRT
Screening – with Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT): Presentation Develop a PowerPoint presentation that includes the following criteria ( slide numbers are a guide only) • • • • • • • • Slide 1: Title Page. Slide 2: SBIRT overview – Describe the history of SBIRT, the SBIRT process and how it is used in clinical practice settings using US research articles. Slide 3: Case Presentation – Do not include patient identifying information but include demographics i.e. age, gender, race/ethnicity, chief complaint, social history, family psychiatric history, psychiatric history, and risk factors. Slide 4: Screening Tool used – Describe the brief intervention screening tool, validity (sensitivity and specificity), scoring information, and citation. Your patient’s score and the interpretation of the patient’s score shown on the screening tool are required. Slide 5: Brief Intervention – How was the Motivational Interviewing process applied (label your transcript)? What is the stage of change? What roadblocks were noted? Explain this in detail Slide 6: Referral for Treatment – Describe the referral for the follow-up treatment plan. Include the name, address and telephone number of the local, large organization. Be specific with the department where necessary. Slide 7: Evaluation of the process – Share the patient’s outcome and your evaluation of the SBIRT process. Slide 8: References –5 references. 7th Edition APA format. Include Screening Tool authors. Submission Instructions: • • • • The slides are to be clear and concise, and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation, and misspellings. The PowerPoint presentation should be formatted per current APA guidelines and 8-10 slides in length, including the title and references slides. Incorporate a minimum of 5 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Upload your PowerPoint without the narration for this assignment. Late work policies, expectations regarding proper citations, acceptable means of responding to peer feedback, and other expectations are at the discretion of the instructor. Criteria Ratings Introduction view longer description 5 to >3 pts Exemplary Introduced group established rapport, and explained the purpose of presentation in a creative, clear way capturing attention PRIOR to the presentation. 3 to >1 pts Proficient Started with a group introduction or “Our topic is” PRIOR to the presentation. Did not explain the purpose of the presentation. 1 to >0 pts Developing Did not introduce the group OR did not explain the purpose of the presentation. 0 pts Novice Did not clearly introduce the purpose of the presentation. Or nothing was submitted. SBIRT Overview view longer description 15 to >10 pts Exemplary Describes the definition, history and current US evidence surround the use of the Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment in the psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner role. Specifically addressed the disease as it relates to one of the following populations: an adolescent, or adult. 10 to >5 pts Proficient Describes the definition, history and current US evidence surround the use of the Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment in the psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner role. Specifically addressed the disease as it relates to one of the following populations: an adolescent, or adult. 5 to >1 pts Developing Describes the definition, history and current US evidence surround the use of the Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment in the psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner role. Specifically addressed the disease as it relates to one of the following populations: an adolescent, or adult. 1 to >0 pts Novice Describes the definition, history and current US evidence surround the use of the Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment in the psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner role. Specifically addressed the disease as it relates to one of the following populations: an adolescent, or adult. 0 pts Non-Performance Nothing was submitted. Screening Tool view longer description 20 to >14 pts Exemplary The screening tool used was discussed in detail. The tool used was highly specific and sensitive, based on current US evidence, to the population, ethnicity, age, and gender of the client. The raw score and its interpretation were discussed in detail. 14 to >8 pts Proficient Criteria Ratings The screening tool used was mentioned. The tool was poorly specific and sensitive to the population, ethnicity, age, and gender of the client. The raw score and its interpretation were mentioned. 8 to >2 pts Developing The screening tool used was mentioned. The tool used was not recommended for the population, ethnicity, age, and/or gender of the client. The raw score was mentioned but not interpreted. 2 to >0 pts Novice The screening tool used was mentioned. 0 pts Non-Performance Nothing was submitted. Brief Intervention view longer description 25 to >17 pts Exemplary Provides a summary of the four stages of the motivational interview: Engaging, Focusing, Evoking, and Planning with detailed descriptions for each area. Includes how the OARS technique was used during the session, roadblocks and the client’s stage of change. 17 to >10 pts Proficient Provides a summary of 3 of the four stages of the motivational interview: Engaging, Focusing, Evoking, and Planning with detailed descriptions for each area. Includes how the OARS technique was used during the session, roadblocks and the client’s stage of change. 10 to >3 pts Developing Provides a summary of two of the four stages of the motivational interview: Engaging, Focusing, Evoking, and Planning with detailed descriptions for each area. Includes how the OARS technique was used during the session, OR roadblocks OR the client’s stage of change. 3 to >0 pts Novice The stages of the motivational interview were mentioned without detailed descriptions: Engaging, Focusing, Evoking, and Planning. 0 pts Non-Performance Nothing was submitted. Referral view longer description 5 to >3 pts Exemplary Provides a detailed list of three or more referrals to local, large organizations for allied health, psychologist, medical, and other interdisciplinary support. Includes a timeline for follow-up appointments. 3 to >2 pts Proficient Provides a detailed list of two referrals to local, large organizations for allied health, psychologist, medical, and other interdisciplinary support. Includes a timeline for follow-up appointments. 2 to >0 pts Developing Provides a detailed list of one referral to local, large organizations for allied health, psychologist, medical, and other interdisciplinary support. A timeline for follow-up appointments is not provided. Criteria Ratings 0 pts Novice A referral was not provided during the session. Or nothing was submitted. APA Formatting view longer description 10 to >7 pts Exemplary References page contains at least the required current scholarly academic reference and text reference. Follows 7th Edition APA guidelines of components e.g., double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent and in-text citations in 100% of the references. 7 to >4 pts Proficient References page contains one current scholarly academic resource and text reference. Follows 7th Edition APA guidelines of components: double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent, and in-text citations in up to 50% of the references. 4 to >0 pts Developing References page contains one current or outdated scholarly academic resource. Follows 7th Edition APA e.g., double space, 12 pt. font, abstract, level headings, hanging indent, and in-text citations in at least 25% of the references. 0 pts Novice References page does not include current, scholarly academic resources, only internet webpages or no reference page. Does not follow 7th Edition APA guidelines for references provided or in-text citations. Or nothing was submitted.
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
