Opposing argument Various Factors Shape Organizational Culture

Opposing argument Various Factors Shape Organizational Culture. Organizational culture hinges on something other than the CEO’s leadership style. Instead, it is an intricate amalgamation of various internal and external elements. Factors such as industry dynamics, market competition, historical background, and employee demographics influence an organization’s culture considerably. Researchers such as the organizational development consultant Mahler (2021) show that organizational culture is based on shared values and beliefs that go far beyond any single leader. This is even though those values are created by leaders’ reactions to other people’s values and beliefs. Organizational culture also results from the interactions and behavior of every member of an organization. This spans from the subcultures in different departments to the employment relationships in the entire organization to informal networks that define any person’s life. Consequently, attributing the entirety of organizational culture to the CEO’s leadership style must be more concise in a multifaceted process (Dauber et al., 2022). Moreover, while CEOs are often seen as the key drivers of organizational performance, their control over the company and decision-making is not ultimate, and external factors also influence their leadership styles. Empowering structures of corporations, overseen by the board, shareholders’ interests, and regulatory requirements, all impact a CEO’s decisions about his/her leadership role. CEOs typically work within an ecosystem with limited people to manage by themselves. Therefore, they must consider the broader stakeholder circle when selecting their preferred leadership style. Organizational culture is a collective phenomenon that arises from the interactions and behaviors of all individuals within the organization. This extends beyond the influence of the CEO’s leadership style alone. Subcultures within various departments or teams, along with employee relationships and informal networks, play pivotal roles in shaping the overall organizational culture. Therefore, attributing the entirety of organizational culture solely to the CEO’s leadership style oversimplifies a multifaceted phenomenon. Rather than only thinking of one culture, everyone in the organization is a part of it, and one can start to appreciate the variety of contributions from the various members within an organization (Mahler, 2021). This gives more insights into how culture grows and changes long-term. Realizing the title and bulk of the interrelationships is crucial for organizations to recognize and appreciate all the factors in creating a unique culture. It makes it possible to handle a variety of circumstances going beyond the typical outlook concerning authority and leadership effects from above. CEO Leadership Style is Subject to Constraints and Influence Even though CEOs do indeed exercise a significant degree of agency leadership and strongly influence their organization’s direction, their leadership style is influenced by constraints and contingencies. This includes their roles and responsibilities as defined by organizational structures and corporate governance policies (Dauber et al., 2021). It is also influenced by terminal constraints and control mechanisms such as board oversight and review, CEOs’ accountability to shareholders, and regulatory requirements. CEOs are also often selected for their fit with an organization’s culture or may be recruited to specific roles based on the board’s strategic design or intent (Cera & Kusaku, 2020). These influences can restrict authenticity in the leadership style of a CEO, limiting and reshaping a CEO’s agency. This prompts us to reflect on how much the agency of the CEO is constrained and shaped by their organizational context in ways that might alter the picture of the relationship between the CEO’s leadership style and its influence on an organization’s culture. Furthermore, CEOs do not possess omnipotent authority. They function within a broader stakeholder ecosystem comprising senior executives, middle management, employees, and external partners. In this context, power struggles often limit a CEO’s ability to impose his or her preferred leadership style. According to Lasrado and Kassem (2021), “challenging forces condition phenomena known as “managerial discretion.” This indicates that CEOs operate within a delimited range of choices influenced by contextual factors. This understanding challenges the perception of CEOs as absolute decision-makers and emphasizes the intricate interplay of various forces that shape leadership dynamics within organizations. Furthermore, CEOs might also respond to situational demands or crises in ways that change their leadership style, directly undermining claims that they wield ‘the most powerful force’ of organizational culture. Therefore, to the extent that CEOs shape organizational culture, it is only through leading particular aspects of it: leadership style is subject to several constraints, of which CEOs are just one. Importance of Shared Leadership and Distributed Influence The traditional emphasis on the CEO’s leadership style as the primary driver of organizational culture overlooks the importance of shared leadership and distributed influence within modern organizations. Rising from this is the new structure of the workplace featuring increasingly collaborative, decentralized, and network-based structures instead of traditional, hierarchical leadership models. Dauber et al.’s (2022) study of shared leadership promotes the balancing and distributing influence and decision-making to include multiple positions within an organization. Designing organizations for shared leadership capitalizes on a host of complementary perspectives and experiences, all contributing to goals and decision-making across all organizational levels and functions. In response to rapid changes in the business environment, shared leadership enables many more individuals to contribute to decision-making, opening up new avenues for innovation and adaptive change (Cera & Kusaku, 2020). Employee engagement strengthens, nurturing a culture of ownership and accountability and fostering successful business outcomes. Moreover, the rise of empowered teams and cross-functional collaboration means that leadership influence is no longer confined to the executive suite. As such, emerging leaders form smaller groups known as subcultures. This groups exert substantial power in driving organizational innovation and employee engagement. Creating a space for diversity and inclusion is the first step in creating a workplace where different voices and talents can thrive (Martins & Terblanche, 2023). Welcoming more perspectives in the room fosters a sense of inclusion for employees, often translating into greater motivation and skills while at the same time fostering organizational agility. When more people are involved, all layers of the organization feel they have unique leadership abilities. This creates a culture of growth and mutual understanding within the workplace, instilling confidence in organizational success. Furthermore, organizational culture is not a static entity, but a dynamic process shaped by ongoing interactions and collective experiences. Although CEOs are supposed to set the tone and provide strategic direction, the holds and values of all the stakeholders sustain and evolve the culture through the years (Kalkan et al., 2020). Ignoring the contribution of middle-level managers and grassroots employees and strengthening the informal club would damage the whole culture and richness of the company. Supporting Argument Their leadership style is a leader’s approach, methods, and techniques for directing, deciding, and molding their group or the company. It is predicated on a leader’s behavior patterns at that particular moment, including his communication style preference, decision-making procedures, and overall interpersonal interactions (Legutko, 2020). Leaders have different leadership philosophies, which frequently depend on their personalities, convictions, and basic principles. It also affects how to be the most influential leader. Chief executives’ leadership philosophies significantly influence how organizational culture is guided, either in new directions or returning to the original state (Garengo & Betto, 2022). The selected style ultimately governs the entire company, from authoritarian to transformative. The degree of the styles will, therefore, impact employee reactions, including motivation, engagement, and work atmosphere. However, many other aspects also play a part, and understanding the various shapes that leadership styles may take is crucial to comprehend how they influence organizational cultures (Legutko, 2020). An environment where decisions are made at the top and employee participation in the process is minimal is linked to the prevalence of autocrats. Transformational leadership enhances Cooperative and innovative cultures. The transformational approach fosters a positive and innovative culture that allows the business to develop and adapt (Peng et al., 2020). The crucial relationship between the CEO’s selected leadership style and the ensuing company culture manifests how leaders shape the workplace. Organizations aim to cultivate a culture consistent with their principles and creative vision by recognizing the interconnectedness and connectivity of people and nature. A characteristic of transformational leadership is the CEO’s ability to energize and excite the group, giving employees the drive and motivation to perform at their highest level (Peng et al., 2020). A positive and dynamic work environment might stem from a management style that values creativity and flexibility. As motivators who spur innovation and advancement, transformational leaders drive people forward (Paais & Pattiruhu, 2020). The resulting culture is receptive to new ideas, growth, and development. Leading in a structured, organized, and goal-oriented manner is the focus of transactional leadership. CEOs that use this kind of goal-setting, with rewards and repercussions based on performance, are few (Garengo & Betto, 2022). This can sometimes work both ways since the company may prioritize performance while maintaining a disciplined culture. However, such a setting could not support the freedom of expression to raise novel concepts or methods. Fear and Resistance are the Products of Autocratic Leadership The CEO is the organizational structure’s primary power source and authority, often an autocratic head of state inclined toward interest centralization. The organization’s hierarchical or somewhat pyramidal structure means that directives flow from the top down with little opportunity for staff members to voice their opinions (Paais & Pattiruhu, 2020). As a result, employees may believe their management must approve everything before acting, which might stifle creativity and foster a collaborative atmosphere. In contrast, inclusion and a bottom-up methodology are the main emphases of democratic leadership. As a result, financial limitations still prevent advancement. Since their mindset is to establish a culture of participation and shared accountability that involves employees throughout the corporate levels, this sort of leader takes into account the opinions of all of their subordinates (Alblooshi et al., 2020). This type of leadership fosters a culture of cooperation and transparency inside the company. It gives workers autonomy and authority and encourages them to develop solutions that address a variety of people (Zhang et al., 2020). Servant Leadership Induces a Climate of Empowerment and Services Servant leadership is not about bosses. Instead, the rest of the team and teammates come first. Leaders prioritize the growth and development of staff over themselves (Elche et al., 2020). Servant leader CEOs build an environment of trust, consideration, and empathy that creates better workplace conditions and committed employees. Engaging leaders ensures that their subordinates are involved in all aspects of the process and that collaborative work, teamwork, and sharing decisions are paramount. Organizations that have servant leaders who lead by example observe the incidence of highly collaborative team performance and employee engagement that is even higher (Elche et al., 2020). Also, these organizations have more outstanding organizational commitment from their staff. Servant leaders hold ethical standards as peace doves do and consider the continuum of corporate social responsibility that would bring the organizations’ goals to fruition and the actual image society expects. According to Elche et al. (2020), companies with a servant leadership culture as their core leadership principle are said to be more ethical, achieving a high reputation and trust from the stakeholders. The Relationship between CEO Leadership Style and Organizational Culture In organizational culture, the role of leaders may be compared to that of the architects of human cultural entities, with their values and methods of behavior being the erection. Demonstrating the interplay between leadership style and the well-being and fortune of an organization is critical in crediting leaders who have positive impacts and helping them lead their organizations in a way that they attain success (Xenikou, 2022). My management adoption of style has served the management of office culture as a significant factor in workmates’ relationships, how they work in a team, and the improvement of adaptability of employees to changes (Alblooshi et al., 2020). Consequently, when this aspect is thoughtfully considered, organizations can establish a culture that explains who they are and what they value in life. In addition to the mission, they aim to maintain the organization’s economy while confined to business operations (Xenikou, 2022). The management of the leadership style against the organization’s culture is complicated. However, the company’s performance can be decreased through the organization’s culture. In its thesis, the argument stands that what has more power is the main style of leadership by the CEOs driving the culture. According to Xenikou (2022), Knowledge of different leadership styles also enables the organization to make decisions and act with complete thoroughness correctly. These decisions add to the company’s mission statement and vision, thus developing the corporate culture toward progress, innovation, and sustainability. With the role of the CEO leading to the specification of the organizational culture, the way the employees act, perceive, and perform depends on the CEO’s leadership style. Visionary leaders motivate and facilitate innovation and teamwork, racketeers generate fear, and operations do not operate effectively, while selfless leaders train and encourage followers to do the same. By getting to grips with the CEO leadership style effect on organizational culture, companies can align leadership practices with values and goals they would like to achieve and, consequently, emerge on top in the modern business world, which keeps changing and delivering new challenges. Therefore, it is evident that a CEO’s leadership style is the most influential force in organizational culture.

Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers

Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.

Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS

Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?

Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.

We write plagiarism Free Content

Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.

Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.