GDECE 102 Learning and Development birth to two years Assessment 2 rubric
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-3973(99)00042-8
GDECE 102 Learning and Development birth to two years Assessment 2 rubric
Task description:
Based on analysis of the case study provided, design appropriate learning and teaching strategies for the child in an early childhood education setting. The needs of the child should be understood through Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory. The learning and teaching strategies should also be justified through ecological systems theory. Draw upon a range of literature to support your analysis and decision making.
Criteria :
· Explain your understanding of Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory (300 – 500 words)
· Apply the theory to analyse the focus child in the case study provided. (300 – 500 words)
· Develop a range of teaching and learning strategies to address the developmental needs of the child (800 – 1000 words)
This assignment should include a brief introduction and conclusion.
Word count : 2000 words +/- 10%
NOTE: SCEI-HE requires its students to observe the highest ethical standards in every aspect of their academic work. SCEI-HE actively demonstrates its commitment to academic integrity by recognising scholarly work and penalising all forms of academic dishonesty. Please refer to the Institute’s HEPP01 Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure for further information or speak to your lecturer, Academic Support Coordinator or Librarian.
Formatting: 12-point serif font (eg. Times New Roman). 1.5 or double line spacing.
Referencing: APA7 (please refer to this guide for referencing guidelines)
Due Date: FRIDAY 2nd February, 2024 11:59PM
Grading Scale:
|
Grade Criteria |
High Distinction |
Distinction |
Credit |
Pass |
Not Meeting Requirements |
||
|
C1. Explain your understanding of Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory (15 marks) |
1.1 Bronfen-brenner’s ecological systems theory is explained in detail, with some critical reflection. |
1.2 Bronfen-brenner’s ecological systems theory is clearly explained. |
1.3 Bronfen-brenner’s ecological systems theory is clearly described. |
1.4 Bronfen-brenner’s ecological systems theory is accurately outlined but may lack detail. |
1.5 Bronfen-brenner’s ecological systems theory is outlined, may contain minor mis-understandings. |
1.6 Bronfen-brenner’s ecological systems theory is discussed but contains key mis-understandings and/or inaccuracies. |
1.7 Bronfen-brenner’s ecological systems theory is absent, or barely mentioned. |
|
C2. Apply the theory to analyse the focus child in the case study provided. (10 marks) |
2.1 Child is clearly introduced, and ecological systems theory is applied to the case with detailed explanation and critical reflection. |
2.2 Child is clearly introduced, and ecological systems theory is applied to the case with detailed explanation. |
2.3 Child is clearly introduced, and ecological systems theory is clearly applied to the case, with relevant details included to support understanding. |
2.4 Child is clearly introduced, and ecological systems theory is clearly applied to the case. |
2.5 Child is clearly introduced, and a clear attempt has been made to analyse the case through ecological systems theory. |
2.6 Discussion of the child is brief, with no reference to the theory. |
2.7 Discussion of the child is either absent or mostly inaccurate. |
|
C3. Develop a range of teaching and learning strategies to address the needs of the child (15 marks) |
3.1 Teaching and learning strategies are explained in detail in terms of ecological systems theory and connected to the analysis of the case. Critical reflection on the strategies included. |
3.2 Teaching and learning strategies are clearly explained in terms of ecological systems theory and connected to the analysis of the case. |
Teaching and learning strategies are clearly explained and connected to the analysis of the case. |
3.4 Teaching and learning strategies are clearly described and meet the needs of the child. |
3.5 Teaching and learning strategies are stated but may not clearly address the needs of the child. |
3.6 Teaching and learning strategies are noted, but unclear or irrelevant. |
3.7 Teaching and learning strategies are absent or mostly inaccurate. |
|
C.4 Relevant academic literature is drawn upon to support explanations and arguments presented. (5 marks) |
4.1 A broad range of academic literature is drawn upon to justify argument |
4.2 A broad range of academic literature is drawn upon to clarify argument |
4.3 A range of academic literature is drawn upon to support argument. |
4.4 A range of academic literature is drawn upon, but only superficially supports argument. |
4.5 Minimal academic literature drawn upon. |
4.6 Academic literature drawn upon, but irrelevant to target content. |
4.7 No literature drawn upon or literature drawn upon is not from appropriate sources. |
|
C5. Assignment is formatted according to requirements and written clearly and cohesively. APA 7 referencing is used. Word limit is adhered to. (5 marks) |
C4.1 The assignment is clear and free of typographical and structural features that hinder understanding. There is no confusion between author voice and that of sources. The assignment is formatted according to stated requirements. The assignment is formatted according to stated requirements. Accurate mechanics of in-text and end-of-text APA (7th Ed.) referencing style were used. Word limit met. |
C4.2 The assignment is clear with minor typographical and structural features that may hinder understanding. There is minimal confusion between author voice and that of sources. The assignment is mostly formatted according to stated requirements. Accurate mechanics of in-text and end-of-text APA (7th Ed.) referencing style were used with minor inconsistencies (no more than 2 errors). Word limit met. |
C4.3 The assignment is clear with typographical and structural features that may hinder understanding. There is minor confusion between author voice and that of sources. The assignment is partly formatted according to stated requirements. Mechanics of in-text and end-of-text APA (7th Ed.) referencing style were used with inconsistencies (no more than 4 errors). Word limit met. |
C4.4 The assignment has typographical and structural features that significantly hinder understanding. There is confusion between author voice and that of sources. The assignment is minimally formatted according to stated requirements. Mechanics of in-text and end-of-text APA (7th Ed.) referencing contain several errors. Word limit met. |
C4.5 The assignment has typographical and structural features that prohibit understanding. There is confusion between author voice and that of sources, or author’s voice is absent. The assignment is not formatted according to stated requirements. Mechanics of in-text and end-of-text APA (7th Ed.) referencing style were not used appropriately. Word limit not met. |
,
GDECE 102 Learning and Development birth to two years Assessment 2 rubric
Task description:
Based on analysis of the case study provided, design appropriate learning and teaching strategies for the child in an early childhood education setting. The needs of the child should be understood through Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory. The learning and teaching strategies should also be justified through ecological systems theory. Draw upon a range of literature to support your analysis and decision making.
Criteria :
· Explain your understanding of Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory (300 – 500 words)
· Apply the theory to analyse the focus child in the case study provided. (300 – 500 words)
· Develop a range of teaching and learning strategies to address the developmental needs of the child (800 – 1000 words)
This assignment should include a brief introduction and conclusion.
Word count : 2000 words +/- 10%
NOTE: SCEI-HE requires its students to observe the highest ethical standards in every aspect of their academic work. SCEI-HE actively demonstrates its commitment to academic integrity by recognising scholarly work and penalising all forms of academic dishonesty. Please refer to the Institute’s HEPP01 Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure for further information or speak to your lecturer, Academic Support Coordinator or Librarian.
Formatting: 12-point serif font (eg. Times New Roman). 1.5 or double line spacing.
Referencing: APA7 (please refer to this guide for referencing guidelines)
Due Date: FRIDAY 2nd February, 2024 11:59PM
Grading Scale:
|
Grade Criteria |
High Distinction |
Distinction |
Credit |
Pass |
Not Meeting Requirements |
||
|
C1. Explain your understanding of Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory (15 marks) |
1.1 Bronfen-brenner’s ecological systems theory is explained in detail, with some critical reflection. |
1.2 Bronfen-brenner’s ecological systems theory is clearly explained. |
1.3 Bronfen-brenner’s ecological systems theory is clearly described. |
1.4 Bronfen-brenner’s ecological systems theory is accurately outlined but may lack detail. |
1.5 Bronfen-brenner’s ecological systems theory is outlined, may contain minor mis-understandings. |
1.6 Bronfen-brenner’s ecological systems theory is discussed but contains key mis-understandings and/or inaccuracies. |
1.7 Bronfen-brenner’s ecological systems theory is absent, or barely mentioned. |
|
C2. Apply the theory to analyse the focus child in the case study provided. (10 marks) |
2.1 Child is clearly introduced, and ecological systems theory is applied to the case with detailed explanation and critical reflection. |
2.2 Child is clearly introduced, and ecological systems theory is applied to the case with detailed explanation. |
2.3 Child is clearly introduced, and ecological systems theory is clearly applied to the case, with relevant details included to support understanding. |
2.4 Child is clearly introduced, and ecological systems theory is clearly applied to the case. |
2.5 Child is clearly introduced, and a clear attempt has been made to analyse the case through ecological systems theory. |
2.6 Discussion of the child is brief, with no reference to the theory. |
2.7 Discussion of the child is either absent or mostly inaccurate. |
|
C3. Develop a range of teaching and learning strategies to address the needs of the child (15 marks) |
3.1 Teaching and learning strategies are explained in detail in terms of ecological systems theory and connected to the analysis of the case. Critical reflection on the strategies included. |
3.2 Teaching and learning strategies are clearly explained in terms of ecological systems theory and connected to the analysis of the case. |
Teaching and learning strategies are clearly explained and connected to the analysis of the case. |
3.4 Teaching and learning strategies are clearly described and meet the needs of the child. |
3.5 Teaching and learning strategies are stated but may not clearly address the needs of the child. |
3.6 Teaching and learning strategies are noted, but unclear or irrelevant.< Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers. Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper? Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials. We write plagiarism Free Content Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties. Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.  All Rights Reserved Terms and Conditions |