In Genesis 39, Joseph – a man of power and influence- refuses to compromise his morals, ethics, and integrity and is paid back harshly by man. Compare this with the Lord’s attitude toward
In Genesis 39, Joseph – a man of power and influence- refuses to compromise his morals, ethics, and integrity and is paid back harshly by man. Compare this with the Lord's attitude toward Joseph's behavior. Combine this with Proverbs 29:25 to explain your views on the responsibility of public servants in the criminal justice system to understand the importance of ethical behavior.
(250-300 words)
3/23/2021
1
Ethical Dilemmas and Decisions in
Criminal Justice Tenth Edition
Chapter 7 Police Corruption
and Responses
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Learning Objectives
1. Provide examples of two types of police misconduct:
economic corruption and abuse of authority.
2. Describe individual explanations of corruption and
potential solutions.
3. Explain organizational explanations of corruption and
potential solutions.
4. Describe societal explanations of corruption and
potential solutions.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Economic Corruption (1 of 2)
• Officers using their position to acquire unfair benefits
• 1973 Knapp Commission—New York City Police
Department corruption
• Includes:
– Gratuities
– Kickbacks
– Overtime schemes
– Misuse of dept. property
1
2
3
3/23/2021
2
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Economic Corruption (2 of 2)
– Payoffs
– Ticket “fixing”
– Bribery/extortion
– Theft
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Gratuities
• Items of value given because of role or position, rather
than personal relationship.
• A gift is personal and has no strings attached.
• Common police gratuities include:
– Free coffee
– Discounted or free meals
– Half-price dry cleaning
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Graft
• Graft refers to any exploitation of one’s role, such as
accepting bribes or protection money.
– Examples include taking bribes for changing testimony
or “forgetting,” looking the other way when discovering
an illegal act, or taking kickbacks from a lawyer or tow
truck company for sending them business.
• Officers in the United States rated bribery as the
second most serious offense. Only theft from a crime
scene was rated as more serious.
4
5
6
3/23/2021
3
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Abuse of Authority
• Physical abuse
• Psychological abuse
• Legal abuse
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Professional Courtesy and Ticket-Fixing
• The practice of not ticketing an officer who is stopped
for speeding or for other driving violations
• Justifications for not ticketing other officers are diverse
and creative
• Professional courtesy tends to bleed over into other
forms of misconduct
• More serious than not ticketing, is “fixing” a ticket that
has already been written.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
On-Duty Use of Drugs and Alcohol
• Police work factors that foster drug use:
– Exposure to a criminal element
– Relative freedom from supervision
– Uncontrolled availability of contraband
• Drinking on duty:
– Creates less vulnerability to corruption than drug use
– Creates an ethical dilemma for other officers
– May lead other officers to isolate themselves from or
avoid working with those who drink
7
8
9
3/23/2021
4
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Sexual Misconduct (1 of 2)
Kraska and Kappeler continuum:
• Viewing a victim’s photos/videos for prurient purposes
• Field or custodial strip searches
• Illegal detentions
• Deception to gain sex
• Services for sex
• Sexual assault
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Sexual Misconduct (2 of 2)
• Sapp’s inventory of sexual misconduct:
• Nonsexual contacts that are sexually motivated
• Voyeurism
• Inappropriate contact with crime victims
• Sexual demands of suspects or offenders
• Prostitutes, homeless, and minority women are
extremely vulnerable to sexual extortion by police
officers.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Criminal Cops
• “Miami River Rats”
• “Buddy boys” (NYC)
• Michael Dowd
• Rampart scandal
• Additional scandals in Indianapolis, New Orleands,
Boston, and Philadelphia
10
11
12
3/23/2021
5
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Costs of Corruption
• The costs to communities are considerable.
• Many cities and police departments have also faced
large judgments or agreed to large settlements.
• No evidence to indicate lawsuits are a deterrent to
errant police officers.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Individual Explanations (1 of 3)
• Individual:
– “Rotten-apple” argument (Officer was deviant before
hiring)
– Development of a police personality (Officer became
deviant after hiring)
• Possible predictors: gender, age, education, race,
military experience, academy performance, and prior
history of wrongdoing
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Individual Explanations (2 of 3)
• College-educated officers were less likely to be terminated.
• Women were more likely than male officers to be terminated
during their probation.
• Younger officers (those under 22 years of age when
appointed) were more likely to be terminated during
probation.
• Blacks (but not other minorities) were more likely to be
terminated.
• Those who had prior negative employment histories,
dishonorable discharges, and/or did poorly in the academy
were more likely to be terminated for misconduct.
13
14
15
3/23/2021
6
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Individual Explanations (3 of 3)
• Factors involved in developing PTSD symptoms include:
– Witnessing the death of a friend or partner
– Accidentally killing or wounding a bystander
– Failing to stop a perpetrator
– Killing or wounding a child or teenager
– Viewing the body of a child victim
– Interacting with grieving family
– Feeling caught in a violent riot
– Viewing bloody or gruesome scenes
– Observing an event involving violence or murder
– Being undercover and constantly “on guard”
– Being threatened by suspects
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Organizational Explanations
• Small work groups
• Perverse incentives
• Organizational culture
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Societal Explanations
• If the public does not comply with the law, officers may
rationalize non-enforcement of the law.
• If the public engages in illegal activities, officers may
feel justified in doing the same.
• If the public believes crime control is more important
than due process, police will act on that message.
16
17
18
3/23/2021
7
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Reducing Police Corruption (1 of 2)
• Increase pay
• Eliminate unenforceable laws
• Establish civilian review boards
• Improve training
• Set realistic goals
• Provide ethical leadership
• Perform audits
• Have financial disclosure rules
• Provide written code of ethics
• Provide whistleblowing procedure
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Reducing Police Corruption (2 of 2)
• Improve internal affairs
• Rotate staff in some positions
• Better evidence handling procedures
• Early warning systems
• Use video cameras in patrol cars
• Use covert high-tech surveillance
• Targeted/randomized integrity testing
• Conduct surveys of police and public
• Decriminalize vice crimes
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
“Rotten Apple” Responses (1 of 6)
Improving screening:
• Background checks, interviews, credit checks,
polygraphs, drug tests
• The most common pre-employment screening tool is
the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory
• The so-called “Big Five” (extroversion, neuroticism,
agreeableness, conscientiousness, and openness)
• Conscientiousness seems to be the most relevant to
job performance.
19
20
21
3/23/2021
8
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
“Rotten Apple” Responses (2 of 6)
Education and training:
• Higher formal education standards are not, themselves,
the key to ethical behavior.
• Academy and in-service ethics training are common and
recommended for all departments.
• Many courses use a moral reasoning approach.
• Some advocate an emphasis on character.
• Others recommend case studies.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
“Rotten Apple” Responses (3 of 6)
Integrity testing
• Very controversial
• Not well-received by most officers
• Comparing integrity testing to undercover operations
reveals that:
– Most officers oppose integrity testing
– Most officers support undercover operations
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
“Rotten Apple” Responses (4 of 6)
Early Warning or Audit Systems
• Look at number of complaints, use-of-force reports,
use-of-weapon reports, reprimands, or other indicators
to identify officers.
• Intervention may include more supervision, additional
training, counseling, reassignment, transfer, referral to
an employee assistance program, fitness for duty
evaluation, and/or dismissal.
22
23
24
3/23/2021
9
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
“Rotten Apple” Responses (5 of 6)
Body cameras
• Powerful tool to support citizens who allege brutality
• Officers can turn off the camera when they want
• Cost of the cameras and storing the unimaginable
amount of video make widespread use unfeasible
• Invasion of privacy with such cameras
• Rules regarding whether and when police officers
should turn off the cameras is being worked out
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
“Rotten Apple” Responses (6 of 6)
Public Databases of “Bad” Cops
• As a result of many people not trusting police
departments to root out individuals who should not
have the power and authority inherent in the position,
individuals and groups have constructed databases of
wrongful actions.
• Police argue instances of serious wrongdoing are rare
and problem officers who have a pattern of wrongdoing
are rarer still.
• Such efforts are designed to bring light to the subject of
police misconduct.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
“Rotten Barrel” Responses
• Internal affairs model, civil service, and arbitration
• Civilian review/complaint boards
• Changing the culture
• Ethical leadership
• Societal Responses
• Consent Decrees
• Other Societal Responses
25
26
27
3/23/2021
10
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Consent Decrees (1 of 2)
• Civil rights cases against police officers are rare.
Prosecutors must be able to show that police officers
had a clear intent to violate constitutional rights.
• Consent decrees are mandated reforms, approved by
a federal judge, with a court-appointed monitor to
oversee progress.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Consent Decrees (2 of 2)
• The most common targets for change involve policies
concerning use of force, citizen complaint procedures,
in-car video use, racial profiling, data collection, early
warning systems, and expanded training.
• The major complaint that police and city officials have
against DOJ investigations that end in consent decrees
is that they are extremely expensive.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Discussion Questions
• Is it ever acceptable to take gratuities? What about
coffee at a gas station that is free to anyone who
purchases fuel? Would it be wrong for a law
enforcement officer to take the coffee if he or she
purchased fuel?
• Does this police officer deserve to have the charges
dropped in this case? Why or why not?
https://www.metro.us/news/local-
news/philadelphia/philadelphia-police-officer-arrested-
dui
• If you were pulled over in your car and smelled alcohol
on the officer’s breath, what would you do?
28
29
30
,
3/23/2021
1
Ethical Dilemmas and Decisions in
Criminal Justice Tenth Edition
Chapter 8 Law and Legal
Professionals
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Learning Objectives (1 of 2)
1. Describe the justifications for law, including protections
against harm to others, offensive conduct, harm to self,
and harm to societal morals.
2. Explain the role of law in society and the paradigms
that have developed to understand how law is formed
and enforced.
3. Compare the idea of our criminal law system as an
adversarial system to other descriptions of how the
courtroom works and the relationships between the
legal professionals.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Learning Objectives (2 of 2)
4. Discuss the controversy concerning the role of
advocate as legal agent or moral agent.
5. Describe the history and source of legal ethics for
attorneys and judges. Explain the types of ethical
rules that exist and compare them to the subculture
of winning.
1
2
3
3/23/2021
2
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
The Role of Law
• Administers justice
• Enforces rights
• Is a tool of behavior change
• Is educative
• Natural law: Laws inherent in the natural world that can
be discovered by reason.
• Positivist law: Laws written and enforced by society.
• Good Samaritan Laws, common in Europe, are
legislation that prohibits passing by an accident scene
or witnessing a crime without rendering assistance.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Justifications for Law
• The harm principle: to prevent harm to persons other
than the actor (assault, robbery, arson)
• The offense principle: to prevent serious offense to
persons other than the actor (public indecency or
lewdness)
• Legal paternalism: to prevent harm to the actor (seat
belts)
• Legal moralism: to prohibit conduct that is inherently
immoral (gambling)
• Benefit to others: to provide some benefit to persons
other than the actor (toxic waste dumping)
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Preventing Offensive Behavior
• There are some actions that do not exactly harm
others, but give rise to disgust or offense.
– Public lewdness, disturbing public behavior, noise, or
other actions that infringe on the quality of life of
others can be the subject of laws.
• Vagrancy laws have been overturned by the Supreme
Court
• Courts have upheld “no camping” ordinances to
dissuade the homeless from congregating in a
downtown area.
4
5
6
3/23/2021
3
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Preventing Harm to Self (Legal
Paternalism)
• Laws that protect people from their own behavior.
– Seat belt laws, motorcycle helmet laws, speed limits,
drug laws
• The rules try to create a balance between an
individual’s liberty and government control.
• Paternalistic laws can be supported by an ethics of
care.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Preventing Harm to Self (Legal Moralism)
• In legal moralism law is a moral agent of society, some say in areas where there is no moral agreement.
• Whether an action is moral or immoral is a different question from whether there should be laws regarding the behavior.
• In limited legal moralism there are laws only when violation is of universal standard of morality, as opposed to merely a conventional standard (prevents the situation of some groups forcing their moral code on others).
• Discretion in enforcement patterns is most pronounced in these “gray” areas of crime.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Paradigms of Law
• A paradigm is a fundamental view of the world around
us. It is a model of how ideas relate to one another
forming a conceptual model of the world around us.
– In a consensus paradigm, society is a community
consisting of like-minded individuals who agree on goals
important for ultimate survival; law is functional.
– In a conflict paradigm, society is made up of competing
and conflicting interests; law is a tool used by those in
power.
– In a pluralist paradigm, society is made up of competing
interests, but more than two basic interest groups; law is
tool of power group or coalition.
7
8
9
3/23/2021
4
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
The Consensus Paradigm
• Law serves as a tool of unification.
• Law contributes to the collective conscience by showing
us who is deviant.
• In the consensus paradigm:
– Law is representative. It is a compilation of the do’s and
don’ts that we all agree on.
– Law reinforces social cohesion. It emphasizes our
“we-ness” by illustrating deviance.
– Law is value-neutral. That is, it resolves conflicts in an
objective and neutral manner.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
The Conflict Paradigm
• Criminal definitions are relative and determined by
those who control major social institutions.
• The regulation of business, instead of the
criminalization of harmful business practices arises
from the ability of those in powerful positions to
redefine their activities to their own advantage.
• Law is repressive, a tool of the powerful, and is not
value-neutral.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
The Pluralist Paradigm
• Law arises from interest groups that are in flux.
• The definition of crime may change, depending on
which interest groups have the power to define criminal
behavior and what is currently perceived to be in the
best interests of the most powerful groups.
10
11
12
3/23/2021
5
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
First, Let’s Kill All the Lawyers
• Public has little confidence in lawyers’ abilities to live
up to ideals of equity, fairness, and justice.
• Perhaps the best explanation for the longstanding
distrust of lawyers is that they typically represent
trouble.
• People don’t require a lawyer unless they believe that a
wrong has been done to them or that they need to be
defended.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Law and the Legal Professional (1 of 2)
• Indigent Defense
– The system of indigent defense in the country is
extremely underfunded.
– Funding public defenders adequately would cost
money initially, but might reduce mass incarceration.
• The “Criminalization of Poverty”
– Municipalities have begun to utilize the criminal justice
system as a revenue stream by turning court
personnel into debt collectors.
– When fees from offenders are necessary to fun city
services, there is no incentive to reduce crime.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Law and the Legal Professional (2 of 2)
A “Confidence Game”:
• Advocacy a pretense
• Individualized justice a pretense
Bureaucratic Justice:
• Bureaucratic efficiency supplants goal of justice
• Presumption of guilt (plea bargaining)
The Wedding Cake Model:
• The few "serious" cases are the top layer
• Bottom of the cake represents the majority of cases
• Bottom receive mere token of justice process
13
14
15
3/23/2021
6
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Legal Agent or Moral Agent?
• The Legal Agent model defines the lawyer as neither
moral nor immoral, but merely a tool.
• Under the Special Relationship model, the lawyer places
loyalty to the client above all other considerations.
• Under the Moral Agent model, the lawyer must adhere to
his or her own moral code.
© 2019 Cengage. All rights reserved.
Legal Agent vs. Moral Agent (1 of 3)
• “Hired gun”
• Promotes client’s interests and performs client’s will
• Argument that this is the role of the attorney and ethical
standards and rules keep attorneys from doing illegal or
unethical acts
• Maintains own values of t
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.