COMPETENCIES981.1.1 : CapstoneThe graduate integrates and sy
COMPETENCIES981.1.1 : CapstoneThe graduate integrates and synthesizes competencies from across the degree program and thereby demonstrates the ability to participate in and contribute value to the chosen professional field.INTRODUCTIONFor this assessment, you will provide a detailed report of the result of executing your project. This task covers all aspects of the project plan from analysis (systems and process audit) to post-implementation support. The report has thirteen sections that receive formal grading according to the rubric provided.Before starting this task, ensure that the “Capstone Timeline and Release Form” from Task 1 and “Capstone Prospectus” from Task 2 have passing scores. If Task 1 and Task 2 have not yet passed, your “Written Report” submission for this task will be returned without evaluation.REQUIREMENTSYour submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. An originality report is provided when you submit your task that can be used as a guide. You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.Develop a capstone project that includes the following sections:A. Abstract (suggested length of 200 words)1. Summarize the most important points of the project. Include the following in your summary:• Business/IT problem under investigation• Plan• Research methodology• Implementation proposal• Proposed and actual outcomes B. Introduction1. Summarize the capstone’s highlights. Include the following in your summary:• Project scope, including problem definition• Defense of the solution• Methodology justification• Explanation of the organization of the capstone report C. Systems and Process Audit1. Explain the audit that occurred prior to the project design and development phase. Include the following information in your explanation:• Audit details• Clear problem statement• Problem causes• Business impact of the problem on various organizational units• Cost analysis• Risk analysis D. Detailed and Functional Requirements1. Explain what is required to execute the project. Include the following in your explanation:• Functional (end-user) requirements• Detailed requirements• Existing gaps that a successful project would fill E. Project Design1. Create a project plan to design, develop, test, and implement a solution that addresses the problem statement. Include the following information in your plan:• Scope• Assumptions• Project phases• Timelines• Dependencies• Resource requirements• Risk factors• Important milestones• Deliverables F. Methodology1. Explain your approach to resolving the problem. Include the following in your explanation:• Different potential approaches for project phases• Shortcomings (if any) in your approach2. Defend your approach. Include the following points in your defense:• Justification of the scalability of the chosen approach• Justification of the long-term success of the chosen approach G. Project Development1. Explain the process for developing your project. Include the following in your explanation:• Hardware• Software• Tech stack• Architecture details2. Justify the resources used.3. Discuss the final output. H. Quality Assurance1. Discuss your approach to quality assurance. Include the following in your discussion:• Specify the quality assurance criteria.2. Explain how you tested your solution. Include the following in your explanation:• Justification for test cases and scenarios• Acceptance criteriaI. Implementation Plan1. Discuss the plan for implementing the project. Include the following in your discussion:• Strategy for the implementation• Phases of the rollout• Details of the go-live• Dependencies (if any)• Deliverables• Training plan for users J. Risk Assessment1. Discuss quantitative and qualitative risks associated with your solution.2. Develop a cost/benefit analysis for each risk by addressing the following:• The risk of a benefit shortfall and what a shortfall will cost (e.g., If you predict a 50% decrease in malicious attacks on a particular system, what is the cost of not meeting that benefit level?)• The risk of a cost overrun and its consequences (e.g., Would a cost overrun result in forced reduced staffing?)3. Explain how you would mitigate these risks. Include the following in your explanation:• Rollback plan• Alternatives to the original implementation plan, with pros and cons of each K. Postimplementation Support and Issues1. Discuss postimplementation support for the solution.2. Discuss the resources needed for postimplementation support.3. Develop a plan for short- and long-term maintenance. L. Conclusion, Outcomes, and Reflection1. Summarize the project.a. Discuss the deliverables that you are submitting (e.g., program listings, flow diagrams, site plans).b. Discuss the outcomes (e.g., How did those affected react? Was your project actually implemented? How do you feel about your work?).2. Reflect on what you learned from the process. M. When you use sources, include all in-text citations and references in APA format.N. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.File RestrictionsFile name may contain only letters, numbers, spaces, and these symbols: ! – _ . * ‘ ( )File size limit: 200 MBFile types allowed: doc, docx, rtf, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, odt, pdf, txt, qt, mov, mpg, avi, mp3, wav, mp4, wma, flv, asf, mpeg, wmv, m4v, svg, tif, tiff, jpeg, jpg, gif, png, zip, rar, tar, 7zRUBRICA1:IMPORTANT ASPECTSNOT EVIDENTThe candidate does not provide a logical summary of the most important points of the project.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe candidate provides a logical summary, with limited detail, of the most important points of the project.COMPETENTThe candidate provides a logical summary, with adequate detail, of the most important points of the project.B1:CAPSTONE SUMMARYNOT EVIDENTThe candidate does not provide a logical explanation of the audit that occurred prior to the project design and development phase.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe candidate provides a logical summary, with limited detail, of the capstone’s highlights.COMPETENTThe candidate provides a logical summary, with adequate detail, of the capstone’s highlights.C1:AUDITNOT EVIDENTThe candidate does not provide a logical explanation of the audit that occurred prior to the project design and development phase.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited detail, of the audit that occurred prior to the project design and development phase.COMPETENTThe candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate detail, of the audit that occurred prior to the project design and development phase.D1:PROJECT REQUIREMENTSNOT EVIDENTThe candidate does not provide a logical explanation of what is required to execute the project.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited detail, of what is required to execute the project.COMPETENTThe candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate detail, of what is required to execute the project.E1:PROJECT PLANNOT EVIDENTThe candidate does not create a project plan to design, develop, test, and implement a solution that addresses the problem statement.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe candidate creates a project plan, with limited detail, to design, develop, test, and implement a solution that addresses the problem statement.COMPETENTThe candidate creates a project plan, with adequate detail, to design, develop, test, and implement a solution that addresses the problem statement.F1:APPROACH EXPLANATIONNOT EVIDENTThe candidate does not provide a logical explanation of the chosen approach to resolving the problem.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited detail, of the chosen approach to resolving the problem.COMPETENTThe candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate detail, of the chosen approach to resolving the problem.F2:APPROACH DEFENSENOT EVIDENTThe candidate does not provide a plausible defense of the chosen approach.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe candidate provides a plausible defense of the chosen approach, with limited support.COMPETENTThe candidate provides a plausible defense of the chosen approach, with adequate support.G1:PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PROCESSNOT EVIDENTThe candidate does not provide a logical explanation of the process for developing the project.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited detail, of the process for developing the project.COMPETENTThe candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate detail, of the process for developing the project.G2:RESOURCES USEDNOT EVIDENTThe candidate does not provide a logical justification of the resources used.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe candidate provides a logical justification, with limited support, of the resources used.COMPETENTThe candidate provides a logical justification, with adequate support, of the resources used.G3:FINAL OUTPUTNOT EVIDENTThe candidate does not provide a logical discussion of the final output.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of the final output.COMPETENTThe candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of the final output.H1:QUALITY ASSURANCE APPROACHNOT EVIDENTThe candidate does not provide a logical discussion of the chosen approach to quality assurance.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of the chosen approach to quality assurance.COMPETENTThe candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of the chosen approach to quality assurance.H2:SOLUTION TESTINGNOT EVIDENTThe candidate does not provide a logical explanation of how the solution was tested.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited detail, of how the solution was tested.COMPETENTThe candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate detail, of how the solution was tested.I1:IMPLEMENTATION PLANNOT EVIDENTThe candidate does not provide a logical discussion of the plan for implementing the project.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of the plan for implementing the project.COMPETENTThe candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of the plan for implementing the project.J1:RISK ASSESSMENTNOT EVIDENTThe candidate does not provide a logical discussion of the quantitative and qualitative risks associated with the solution.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited support, of the quantitative and qualitative risks associated with the solution.COMPETENTThe candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate support, of the quantitative and qualitative risks associated with the solution.J2:COST/BENEFIT ANALYSISNOT EVIDENTThe candidate does not develop a cost/benefit analysis for each risk by addressing the given points.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe candidate develops a cost/benefit analysis, with limited detail, for each risk by addressing the given points.COMPETENTThe candidate develops a cost/benefit analysis, with adequate detail, for each risk by addressing the given points.J3:RISK MITIGATIONNOT EVIDENTThe candidate does not provide a logical explanation of how these risks would be mitigated.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited detail, of how these risks would be mitigated.COMPETENTThe candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate detail, of how these risks would be mitigated.K1:POSTIMPLEMENTATION SUPPORTNOT EVIDENTThe candidate does not provide a logical discussion of postimplementation support for the solution.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of postimplementation support for the solution.COMPETENTThe candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of postimplementation support for the solution.K2:POSTIMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT RESOURCESNOT EVIDENTThe candidate does not provide a logical discussion of the resources needed for postimplementation support.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of the resources needed for postimplementation support.COMPETENTThe candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of the resources needed for postimplementation support.K3:MAINTENANCE PLANNOT EVIDENTThe candidate does not develop a plan for short- and long-term maintenance.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe candidate develops a plan, with limited detail, for short- and long-term maintenance.COMPETENTThe candidate develops a plan, with adequate detail, for short- and long-term maintenance.L1:PROJECT SUMMARYNOT EVIDENTThe candidate does not provide a logical summary of the project.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe candidate provides a logical summary, with limited detail, of the project.COMPETENTThe candidate provides a logical summary, with adequate detail, of the project.L1A:DELIVERABLESNOT EVIDENTThe candidate does not provide a logical discussion of the submitted deliverables.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of the submitted deliverables.COMPETENTThe candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of the submitted deliverables.L1B:OUTCOMESNOT EVIDENTThe candidate does not provide a logical discussion of the outcomes.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of the outcomes.COMPETENTThe candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of the outcomes.L2:REFLECTIONNOT EVIDENTThe candidate does not provide relevant reflection on what was learned from the process.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe candidate provides relevant reflection, with limited detail, on what was learned from the process.COMPETENTThe candidate provides relevant reflection, with adequate detail, on what was learned from the process.M:SOURCESNOT EVIDENTWhen the candidate uses sources, the candidate does not provide in-text citations and references.APPROACHING COMPETENCEWhen the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and references with major deviations from APA style.COMPETENTWhen the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and references with no readily detectable deviations from APA style, OR the candidate does not use sources.N:PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATIONNOT EVIDENTContent is unstructured, is disjointed, or contains pervasive errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar. Vocabulary or tone is unprofessional or distracts from the topic.APPROACHING COMPETENCEContent is poorly organized, is difficult to follow, or contains errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar that cause confusion. Terminology is misused or ineffective.COMPETENTContent reflects attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively conveys the intended meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation and understanding.
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
