Substance abuse and the current treatment options available 4 pages in length, not including title or reference page. APA formatting and citation style. SubstanceAbuseTreat
Substance abuse and the current treatment options available
4 pages in length, not including title or reference page.
APA formatting and citation style.
Substance Abuse Treatment
For this assignment, you will write a paper related to substance abuse and the current treatment options available.
Your writing assignment should:
· follow the conventions of Standard English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.);
· be well ordered, logical, and unified, as well as original and insightful;
· be a minimum of 4 pages in length, not including title or reference page;
· display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics; and
· use APA formatting and citation style.
Include the following information in your paper:
Introduction
Current substance abuse prevalence in the U.S. (trends, stats, etc.)
Treatment options
Compare and contrast methadone and buprenorphine for substance abuse treatment. Include mechanism of action, contraindications, and the pros or cons of each option.
Naltrexone is often used in psychiatric mental health care for many reasons related to addiction and/or impulse control. It is also occasionally used to help patients with self-injurious behaviors or needed weight loss as well. Considering the mechanism of action of naltrexone; how does it aid in substance use treatment?
Conclusion
Writing Assignment Grading Rubric (50 points)
|
Assignment Criteria |
Level III |
Level II |
Level I |
Not Present |
|
Criteria 1 |
Level III Max Points: 15 |
Level II Max Points: 13 |
Level I Max Points: 9 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Content of Paper |
1. Demonstrates a well-articulated understanding of the subject matter in a clear, complex, and informative manner 1. Develops content and theories are well 1. Links content to the paper requirements and practical experience 1. Includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper 1. Uses scholarly resources that were not provided in the course materials 1. Completes all instruction requirements |
1. Demonstrates an understanding of the subject matter 1. Explains and applies knowledge of evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role 1. Uses a variety of scholarly resources from the course material and some that were not provided in the course materials 1. Includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper. 1. Completes all instruction requirements |
1. Demonstrates a moderate understanding of the subject matter 1. Summarizes content with minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role-development 1. Presents content but is missing depth and or development 1. Uses only scholarly resources that were provided in the course materials Completes most instruction requirements |
1. Does not meet the criteria |
|
Criteria 2 |
Level III Max Points: 15 |
Level II Max Points: 13 |
Level I Max Points: 9 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Analysis and Synthesis of Paper Content and Meaning |
1. Provides critical analysis in an accurate, clear, concise, and complete presentation of the required content 1. Synthesizes information from scholarly resources 1. Provides new information or insight related to the context of the assignment with both supportive and alternative information or viewpoints 1. Completes all instruction requirements |
1. Provides evidence of further synthesis of course content via scholarly resources 1. Synthesizes information to help fulfill paper requirements 1. Supports content with at least one viewpoint. 1. Completes all instruction requirements |
1. Lacks clarification or new information 1. Supports content with scholarly reference without adding any new information or insight 1. Provides content that may be confusing or unclear, and the summary may be incomplete 1. Completes most instruction requirements |
1. Does not meet the criteria |
|
Criteria 3 |
Level III Max Points: 10 |
Level II Max Points: 8 |
Level I Max Points: 6 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Application of Knowledge |
1. Offers a multidisciplinary approach via scholarly resources 1. Applies practice that is accurate and plausible 1. Supports practice with additional scholarly resources 1. Answers all questions posed within the assignment in a well-developed manner with citations for validation 1. Completes all instruction requirements |
1. Presents a summary of the paper’s content, findings, and knowledge gained 1. Indicates how the information will be used within their professional practice 1. Completes all instruction requirements |
1. Lacks objective criteria 1. Applies superficial bridge between the assignment and the broader course content 1. Indicates how they will apply this new knowledge to their clinical practice in a vague manner 1. Completes most instruction requirements |
1. Does not meet the criteria |
|
Criteria 4 |
Level III Max Points: 5 |
Level II Max Points: 4 |
Level I Max Points: 3 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Organization |
1. Provides well-organized content with a clear and complex purpose statement and content argument 1. Provides concise writing with a logical flow of ideas |
1. Provides organized content with an informative purpose statement and supportive content and summary statement 1. Provides argument content with minimal issues in content flow |
1. Provides poor organization, and flow of ideas distract from content 1. Provides a purpose statement 1. Provides narrative that is difficult to follow and frequently causes reader to reread work |
1. Does not meet the criteria |
|
Criteria 5 |
Level III Max Points: 5 |
Level II Max Points: 4 |
Level I Max Points: 3 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
College-level academic writing |
1. Includes no more than three grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability 1. Meets the assignment length requirements |
1. Includes no more than four grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability 1. Meets the length requirements |
1. Includes five or more grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors makes understanding parts of assignment difficult, but does not interfere with readability 1. Meets the length requirements |
1. Does not meet the criteria |
|
Maximum Total Points |
50 |
42 |
30 |
0 |
|
Minimum Total Points |
43 points minimum |
31 points minimum |
1 point minimum |
0 |
Rubric Title: PMHNP Writing Assignment Grading Rubric (80 points)
|
Assignment Criteria |
Level III |
Level II |
Level I |
Not Present |
|
Criteria 1 |
Level III Max Points: 20 |
Level II Max Points: 16 |
Level I Max Points: 12 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Content of Paper |
1. Demonstrates a well-articulated understanding of the subject matter in a clear, complex, and informative manner 1. Develops content and theories are well 1. Links content to the paper requirements and practical experience 1. Includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper 1. Uses scholarly resources that were not provided in the course materials 1. Completes all instruction requirements |
1. Demonstrates an understanding of the subject matter 1. Explains and applies knowledge of evidence-based practice, ethics, theory, and/or role 1. Uses a variety of scholarly resources from the course material and some that were not provided in the course materials 1. Includes relevant material that fulfills all objectives of the paper. 1. Completes all instruction requirements |
1. Demonstrates a moderate understanding of the subject matter 1. Summarizes content with minimal application to evidence-based practice, theory, or role-development 1. Presents content but is missing depth and or development 1. Uses only scholarly resources that were provided in the course materials Completes most instruction requirements |
1. Does not meet the criteria |
|
Criteria 2 |
Level III Max Points: 20 |
Level II Max Points: 16 |
Level I Max Points: 12 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Analysis and Synthesis of Paper Content and Meaning |
1. Provides critical analysis in an accurate, clear, concise, and complete presentation of the required content 1. Synthesizes information from scholarly resources 1. Provides new information or insight related to the context of the assignment with both supportive and alternative information or viewpoints 1. Completes all instruction requirements |
1. Provides evidence of further synthesis of course content via scholarly resources 1. Synthesizes information to help fulfill paper requirements 1. Supports content with at least one viewpoint. 1. Completes all instruction requirements |
1. Lacks clarification or new information 1. Supports content with scholarly reference without adding any new information or insight 1. Provides content that may be confusing or unclear, and the summary may be incomplete 1. Completes most instruction requirements |
1. Does not meet the criteria |
|
Criteria 3 |
Level III Max Points: 20 |
Level II Max Points: 16 |
Level I Max Points: 12 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Application of Knowledge |
1. Offers a multidisciplinary approach via scholarly resources 1. Applies practice that is accurate and plausible 1. Supports practice with additional scholarly resources 1. Answers all questions posed within the assignment in a well-developed manner with citations for validation 1. Completes all instruction requirements |
1. Presents a summary of the paper’s content, findings, and knowledge gained 1. Indicates how the information will be used within their professional practice 1. Completes all instruction requirements |
1. Lacks objective criteria 1. Applies superficial bridge between the assignment and the broader course content 1. Indicates how they will apply this new knowledge to their clinical practice in a vague manner 1. Completes most instruction requirements |
1. Does not meet the criteria |
|
Criteria 4 |
Level III Max Points: 10 |
Level II Max Points: 8 |
Level I Max Points: 6 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
Organization |
1. Provides well-organized content with a clear and complex purpose statement and content argument 1. Provides concise writing with a logical flow of ideas |
1. Provides organized content with an informative purpose statement and supportive content and summary statement 1. Provides argument content with minimal issues in content flow |
1. Provides poor organization, and flow of ideas distract from content 1. Provides a purpose statement 1. Provides narrative that is difficult to follow and frequently causes reader to reread work |
1. Does not meet the criteria |
|
Criteria 5 |
Level III Max Points: 10 |
Level II Max Points: 8 |
Level I Max Points: 6 |
Not Present 0 Points |
|
College-level academic writing |
1. Includes no more than three grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability 1. Meets the assignment length requirements |
1. Includes no more than four grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors that do not interfere with the readability 1. Meets the length requirements |
1. Includes five or more grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors makes understanding parts of assignment difficult, but does not interfere with readability 1. Meets the length requirements |
1. Does not meet the criteria |
|
Maximum Total Points |
80 |
64 |
48 |
0 |
|
Minimum Total Points |
65 points minimum Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers. Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper? Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials. We write plagiarism Free Content Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties. Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.  All Rights Reserved Terms and Conditions |